Hello, I was wondering if you could please provide me with the specific timeline for reviewing the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | verna gu

There were four reviewers for the paper, two of whom recommended minor revisions, one of whom rejected it without carefully reviewing it. The editor-in-chief, Professor Jan K Sykulski, was very professional and responsible. He personally reviewed the paper and had a colleague review it as well. After giving the authors a chance to make significant revisions, the paper was accepted for publication. Professor Jan K Sykulski is extremely professional and responsible.

(0) 讚！ | dreamint

I’ve submitted two papers to this journal. Although the journal’s IF is not high, the reviewers are often quite critical and the journal requirements are particularly strict.

(0) 讚！ | daoq_b@sjtu.edu.cn

2015-8-7 awaiting referee assignment2015-10-19 awaiting referee scores2015-11-30 awaiting editor-in-chief decision2015-12-1 major revision2016-5-11 minor revision2016-7-1 acceptedSee the beginning of 2017The double-blind review process is rigorous. There are four reviewers in the first instance. Each revision will be returned to the reviewer. The time is long.

(0) 讚！ | Anonumous

Reviewing the publication is a bit slow, because there are many special issues.Among the six issues of the year, there are 1-2 papers that are accepted for general submissions, and others are special issues.The journal papers will be written, the editors are very responsible, and there will generally be review opinions in March-April, but it may be a bit slow after the publication.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名