Submission on 8/26
Still waiting for WE to find reviewers by 9/10.

(0) 讚！ | Good luck-l

8.27 STJ
8.27 WE
Until now, it is still "we", not sure when a decision will be made, hoping for the editor to be lenient.

(0) 讚！ | 小白JJJ

Submitted on August 22nd, waiting for feedback on the 23rd, and still waiting as of September 3rd.

(0) 讚！ | guangwang

8.24 STJ
8.24 WE
8.27 WE
8.29 WE
9.2 UR
Editing efficiency is really powerful, receiving favorable reviews from reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 哭泣小萝卜888

Please record that the submission was made on August 31st, and sent directly to WE.

(0) 讚！ | LIU5566

Did you send it? I submitted on 8.24, the date has changed twice, 8.31 is still We.

(0) 讚！ | 哭泣小萝卜888

The boss asked, how do we know which editor has taken it without submitting it for review?

(0) 讚！ | se1f

It is normal to change editors. The editor initially assigned may not be familiar with your research direction and may find it difficult to make decisions.

(0) 讚！ | se1f

Submission Record
8/21 stj
8/21 we
8/25 ur

(0) 讚！ | langlee

After about 6 months of waiting, I finally got the job. I wish the journal will continue to improve.

(1) 讚！ | 绿老头想发top

Finally hired, returned to the editor after modification, and was hired directly.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小匠

It was also this editor who hired me a few days ago.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小匠

The same editor also hired today.

(0) 讚！ | 学术小匠

Did you submit the second submission for review?

(0) 讚！ | its my pleasure

I need to clarify that I was rejected before.

(0) 讚！ | Mep

Hey Mep, have you indicated the revisions in the cover letter? Or should we submit it as a completely new piece?

(0) 讚！ | its my pleasure

Submitting articles is like a mysterious art, hahaha.

(0) 讚！ | zzzcsupm006

Without being asked to resubmit, I felt that the reviewer's comments were unreasonable, but I was able to make the changes. I then resubmitted the revised manuscript as a new submission.

(0) 讚！ | Mep

Isn't it usually the editor-in-chief or associate editor who decides whether to submit for review? If the submission is rejected, does the editor-in-chief say it can be resubmitted?

(0) 讚！ | its my pleasure

During the first review, the edits were made by him, and he even acknowledged the work himself in the comments. However, when it came to revisions, he immediately rejected them. It's a bit confusing as to what kind of operation this is - he either wants it or doesn't, and rejects it casually.

(0) 讚！ | zzzcsupm006

I still feel it depends on whether the editor is interested in the work I have done, after my previous submission was rejected. I revised it according to the reviewer's comments and resubmitted, and it was him who selected it for review again. I submitted it a total of 3 times before it was finally accepted on the third attempt.

(0) 讚！ | Mep

8.4 with editor

(0) 讚！ | acceptedddddddddd

Editor-in-chief Uday, submitted in June, received a few minor revisions, and the editor also suggested major revisions. After resubmitting, it was rejected by Editor-in-chief Uday directly for being out of the scope of the journal, with no response to the appeal, and the resubmission was also rejected instantly...

(0) 讚！ | zzzcsupm006

You must have submitted this after the supervisor reviewed it and found no major issues. If you are not the corresponding author, the system will naturally enter the waiting for author approval stage after submission, generating a preview PDF. If the corresponding author does not approve, the article will not enter the "With Editor" status.

(0) 讚！ | Tbi Papy

Invited four, actually two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | Stellavis