I have also wasted almost a year of time. I submitted in November 23rd and received reviewer comments in August of the following year (from 3 reviewers). I resubmitted around September and got rejected by the end of the month. All 3 reviewers recommended acceptance, so I emailed the editor-in-chief for another chance to revise. They agreed, so I resubmitted in late October. However, I was ultimately rejected by the EIC, as they receive too many articles of this kind.

(0) 讚！ | 凉风so

May I ask how long does RRC usually last?

(0) 讚！ | 咸鱼一条

Just like you, the reviewers didn't say anything, the editors rejected it, wasting nearly a year, it serves us right to be warned.

(0) 讚！ | zhy1109

Moreover, we will probably be in touch next year, so there should be no problem.

(0) 讚！ | zylerc

This journal will be indexed by EI. Does your school allow graduation journals indexed by EI? If so, can you use EI as a graduation requirement directly?

(0) 讚！ | zylerc

The second trial cannot be overturned either, so if it has already been accepted, it cannot be revoked even more.

(0) 讚！ | BDlqy

Originally planned to graduate based on this paper, but suddenly received a warning that it does not meet the academic standards of the school. Currently, it is also impossible to withdraw the paper during the second review. I really don't know what to do.

(0) 讚！ | 阿木木123

Submitted on January 26th, rejected after more than a month, not even sent for review, rejected based on template without any useful feedback. At least 4 others in the same situation during this time period, with the same editor, and the same rejection reasons. Maybe being warned is not enough, but personally I think you deserve it, just pitying the majority of students.

(1) 讚！ | gzy666

There are partitions.

(0) 讚！ | 发必中666666

Is it true or not?

(0) 讚！ | 搞学术真难

I told my supervisor about it, and he said it's okay for me to include it in the paper. But I'm worried that the reviewers might have some thoughts on it. It seems that our school classifies papers based on the Chinese Academy of Sciences' ranking for the year you submitted your thesis.

(0) 讚！ | sdns

I don't know, you should ask the supervisor. I am planning to graduate based on this paper, but there are early warnings now. Oh, I don't know what to do.

(1) 讚！ | 阿木木123

I don't know, you should ask your supervisor. I originally planned to graduate with this paper, but now I can only look for journals.

(0) 讚！ | 阿木木123

Last April, I submitted my paper. In the first round, there were many comments from reviewers and two editors. I replied with over 10,000 words, and after all reviewers agreed to accept it, the editors only raised two formatting issues. I thought it was basically accepted, but after fixing the formatting issues, the editors sent it back for review again. Why didn't they send it for review earlier instead of just mentioning the formatting issues? It was frustrating. Then, after receiving feedback and making revisions, the reviewers agreed to accept it again, and the editors invited new reviewers once more. This cycle repeated four times, and I went through five rounds of revisions. Each time the reviewers were satisfied, new reviewers were invited. I don't understand what the editors were thinking. In the end, I had no choice but to withdraw my submission after wasting a year. The journal was pure frustration, and it serves them right to be warned.

(0) 讚！ | wwwjjj

Can this be included in the research results of the master's thesis now that it has become an early warning periodical? Last year's.

(1) 讚！ | sdns

Good deeds will be rewarded with good results, and evil deeds will be punished accordingly. It's not that there will be no consequences, but the time has not come yet.

(0) 讚！ | Brucelei

The Chinese Academy of Sciences has returned from the partition, but has been marked with a warning sign.

(0) 讚！ | BDlqy

I also thought I could move up to Zone Two, but ended up being warned and left all the major charts.

(0) 讚！ | shaoshao0633

We have reached the final step, and there is no more district left.

(0) 讚！ | 搞学术真难

Before the new year, I reviewed a paper for this journal and I directly rejected it. To my surprise, it was actually resubmitted. I am speechless. Therefore, I believe this journal is just a paper mill.

(0) 讚！ | 飞翔的猫咪

This journal is like this, the experts they find are all very unprofessional.

(0) 讚！ | 飞翔的猫咪

I reviewed the papers of this journal before the New Year. The papers were written terribly, so I directly rejected them. Who would have thought that the editor-in-chief would actually ask for a resubmission, I am speechless. Therefore, I think this journal is just a paper factory, there is nothing wrong with my assessment.

(0) 讚！ | 飞翔的猫咪

It's ridiculous that they won't give points for withdrawing alerts in the future.

(0) 讚！ | BDlqy

Starting from 2025, the Chinese Academy of Sciences will no longer provide rankings for warning journals! Other warning journals are either not open access or have extremely low impact factors. It's hard to imagine that even caee could be warned, what a wide spectrum!

(0) 讚！ | 子期LZJT

I also sent a withdrawal letter. I won't follow up on this anymore.

(0) 讚！ | AI_BOT