The workshop operation schedule editing seems to be in charge of Zheng Da Zhao. Anyway, it was him who was responsible for it during that time.

(0) 讚！ | fjcyue007

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

I have invited 9 people to be reviewers for my submission, but it has been a month and none of them have agreed to review it. How long does the editor usually wait before inviting them again?

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

This journal is really toxic. The submission I made in March last year is still under review. It was 8-2-0 in June last year, and now it has become 13-3-0 in April this year. They don't even reject submissions, they just keep dragging it out. I have sent them emails three or four times already.

(0) 讚！ | 无望9988

It's really too slow. I filed the lawsuit on March 16th last year, and it's still in the first instance now. Moreover, the status has changed from 8-2-0 to 13-3-0, and there has been no progress at all.

(0) 讚！ | 无望9988

Five months have passed and the first trial has not yet concluded.

(0) 讚！ | ximo1002

It took me eight months to complete my first CAIE, and I submitted the second one on November 18, 2025. However, the review process is still ongoing, and one reviewer has not yet provided feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 康帅

You reviewed it so quickly? What direction are you heading in?

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

Optimization of workshop scheduling.

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

What field is the original poster in?

(0) 讚！ | wxz666

The review submission time is so long. I've been waiting for a week and there's still no progress...

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

Submission on June 19, 2025;
Sent for review on July 24, 2025;
Received major revision comments on October 2, 2025 (two reviewers, revise model, add experiments);
Submitted revised manuscript on October 31, 2025;
Sent for review on November 3, 2025;
Received minor revision comments on December 3, 2025 (same two reviewers);
Submitted revised manuscript on December 23, 2025;
Sent for review on January 25, 2026;
All reviewers returned their comments on February 26, 2026;
Urged for response in the morning of March 8, 2026, and received acceptance in the afternoon;
The review process was relatively lengthy.

(0) 讚！ | X.D.S

Have you received your "we" yet? It's been 3 days for me and I still haven't received mine.

(0) 讚！ | 为往圣继绝学

Has your present been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 烟寒若雨

Do all authors need to confirm by email in order to be approved?

(0) 讚！ | juaneraaa

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 2026.03.12 WE

(0) 讚！ | horizon123

Submission on March 10, 2026.

(0) 讚！ | horizon123

May I ask what will happen next?

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸡boshi

26.1.7 Submission
26.1.11 under review 7 copies
It is now February 4th, and we have received 0 reviews. The editor has also not re-invited the reviewers. Should we follow up?

(0) 讚！ | HIT-凌飞

I submitted it at 1:30 in the evening, and it is still under review by the journal, but it hasn't been sent to WE yet. Is this normal? Have any of you had this experience before?

(0) 讚！ | woshuol1

How did you discover the problem with the PDF? The submission system has been updated now, it's chaotic, and the account association is also constantly incorrect!

(0) 讚！ | little_r

I have been submitting for 23 years. I submitted on November 16th last year, and since then it has been "with editor". The status has not changed so far. What should I do? I have written a follow-up email but have not received a response.

(0) 讚！ | 康帅

Computers & Industrial Engineering, when submitting to the journal, I was unable to preview the PDF and submitted it directly. I couldn't find the option to build the PDF or similar, and then I discovered that the PDF was not compiled correctly in the EM system. How can I solve this? It happened twice, help me, I have no other way.

(0) 讚！ | mlpy

Submitted on January 5, 2026.
Rejected by the editor on January 16, 2026. The reason is that the topic does not match. The paper is about the prediction of a certain time-varying variable in the field of physics information neural networks + metallurgy, and also includes some interpretability analysis of the mechanism.
In previous years, I have seen several similar papers that should have passed the editor's review, with no issues regarding double-blind review or formatting. I have been waiting anxiously for over ten days, only to be rejected in the last half day.

(0) 讚！ | alice_lcw

What's the follow-up like?

(0) 讚！ | 康帅