The submission was made in October 2025, one reviewer accepted and completed the review quickly, but there was no second reviewer. In February 2026, two new reviewers accepted the submission, provided major revisions in April, and sent it back for further revisions on May 4th. After resubmission, one reviewer accepted and completed the review, while the other did not accept until July and has not returned the review by the end of August. An email was sent to the editor to inquire about the status, the number of accepted reviewers changed from 2 to 1 that day, and then back to 2. Four days later, the submission went into the RRC process and has been stuck in the process since then without any changes.

(0) 讚！ | 高光谱学徒

The journal rejected the submission on the grounds that co-authors did not use institutional email addresses, which is an extremely unreasonable rule and blacklisting.

(0) 讚！ | N1

It is very possible to forget, as many reviewers may receive review requests from dozens of journals, making it easy to overlook or forget. In addition, being busy with other commitments is also very common.

(0) 讚！ | GXJ0218

Hiring

(0) 讚！ | 流溪河钓鱼佬

Rejected on August 15, 2026. The first trial ended, and it was rejected without any feedback directly. In battle.

(0) 讚！ | 小狗小猫

The top journal in the field of agricultural engineering, although the review process is a bit slow, took a year from start to finish.

(1) 讚！ | dongwenxue

I reviewed a traditional multimodal article, which was done in a very traditional way. Another reviewer said it lacked innovation and recommended rejection. The editor provided major revisions, but I still think it depends on whether the associate editor will give me a chance.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

The reviewers of the garbage intentionally disgust people, and you don't even check the drafts reviewed by AI? Are you pretending or not, it's all-"", and even AI vocabulary and latex format formulas are coming out. Some opinions don't match the paper at all. AI is really harmful, and the main editor even believes these ghostly opinions. Do editors not carefully read opinions before deciding on a paper? Or are editors too busy to carefully read them, I suspect that the vast majority of editors may not read them carefully. It is very likely that these reviewers whose own papers have not been submitted or have been rejected, and then retaliate against others. The two most terrifying types of people are the ones mentioned above and the ones who receive the drafts for review but refuse to review them. What does that mean? You can't possibly forget, this is also a disgusting way. In short, both of these are disgusting bad things. I hope everyone will be good people and encounter good people.

(0) 讚！ | haha

May 22, stj
Jul 13, ur
Aug 11, rrc

(1) 讚！ | jimidi

It has been half a month for me, also with editor.

(1) 讚！ | 接好运啊啊啊啊啊！

What are we going to do after more than a month without submission for review? And I even chose the OA, it would have been slower if I hadn't chosen the OA.

(0) 讚！ | 好运小鱼儿

It's really too slow, we have to wait for more than a month. I highly doubt that the classmates who claim it will be fast are fake. Both me and my classmates around me are very slow. Everyone, be careful!

(1) 讚！ | 好运小鱼儿

Update: 2026.8.15 accepted
AE Super Invincible Universe Number One Nice!!

(0) 讚！ | Braw

July 28, 2026 stj
August 5, 2026 we

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸟一枚1

8.1 UR 2-3-20

(0) 讚！ | Caelus

In this situation, when you dip, hurry up and urge, don't waste time.

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

Oh, this is so absurd. Isn't 2_2_8 just two people accepting, returning two opinions, isn't that enough? Why did it change to 1_2_12 afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | 小狗小猫

I submitted my article a month and a half ago and haven't heard anything. I followed up with the DIP and still no response over a month later. When I followed up with the desk, they rejected it. I don't understand what this editor is doing. This journal's editor is trash.

(0) 讚！ |

Okay, it has been a month and a half since I submitted it, but there's been no news. Should I follow up on it?

(0) 讚！ | 就这!

Now three additional copies have been added, but there are still two people reviewing the manuscript. One has completed the review, while the other has not made any progress.

(0) 讚！ | 小狗小猫

Wow, which editor is this? It's so efficient.

(0) 讚！ | Jacky

7.16 UR 1-3-20 translates to July 16th, UR 1-3-20 in English.

(0) 讚！ | Caelus

How are you doing? Are you feeling down?

(0) 讚！ | 就这!

Alright, it's already great that it's been submitted for review at least. I'm afraid it might be rejected outright.

(0) 讚！ | 就这!

2025-11-18 WE
2025-12-22 under review UR
2026-01-04 Required Reviews Completed RRC (13 days)
2026-01-08 Required Reviews Completed RRC (18 days)
2026-1-14 Major revision --> Feb 13, 2026
2026-2-2 WE
2026-3-12 under review UR
2026-4-21 under review UR
5-1-2026 Major revision
5-13-2026 submit
Jun 26, 2026 under review UR
July 6, 2026 Accept

(1) 讚！ | yulong