2025.7.28, dip, probably have to say goodbye...

(0) 讚！ | 抹了油的猪

I started submitting articles in mid-January and up to now, July 28th, I have not received any feedback. I have followed up twice in between and invited 21 reviewers, of which 2 accepted but have not provided any feedback so far.

(0) 讚！ | 攀登

Please translate the following paragraph into English:。。。

(0) 讚！ | skaoch

7.8 SJ
7.9 WE

请问这两个短语是否有特定的背景或上下文？因为这两个短语本身并没有明确的含义或内容，无法准确翻译。

(0) 讚！ | 秦梦婷

Really busy! It has been a month.

(0) 讚！ | accpact

I hope to accelerate faster~~

(0) 讚！ | 抹了油的猪

Record the submission process
July 14, 2025  SJ
July 16, 2025  WE

(1) 讚！ | 抹了油的猪

7.22 dipped GG SMD~

(0) 讚！ | 聪明的咚咚锵

Can I request an expedited review for this journal? It has been two and a half months since submission, with UR approaching 50 days. Two manuscripts are under review, but only one has been completed without inviting additional reviewers. Will requesting an expedited review result in rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 一条咸鱼

May I ask what is the current status of the paper?

(0) 讚！ | syh211

Too fast, isn't it?

(0) 讚！ | 岁月静好

July 19, 2025 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 聪明的咚咚锵

6.26 rc
7.10 major revision
7.19 we

(1) 讚！ | Louis

Excuse me, did you experience a dip after your RRC? I had an RC after my RRC, and then a dip, does that mean it's going to cool down?

(0) 讚！ | zseason

Fast is fast, but the topic is not within the scope of the journal. It is suggested to transfer to another top journal in the same field (Field Crops Research) or to their new journal (Smart Agricultural Technology, not yet indexed in SCI). The editor suggests submitting to their special issue on remote sensing technology, as the paper falls under remote sensing applications.

(0) 讚！ | 小马不说话

Record the second impact compag
7.18 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 聪明的咚咚锵

4.22 Reviewer feedback, WE
4.23 UR
5.12 RRC
5.13 Major Revision
5.27 Reviewer feedback, we
5.29 UR
7.15 RRC
7.18 Minor Revision

After two major revisions, it finally became a minor revision. The reviewer who took over in the middle did not provide feedback for a month, which was really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 虔诚之歌

For over a month, the same reviewer has been reviewing the manuscript, but still no decision has been made. The editor also hasn't invited new reviewers. It's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | Pei·Chen

If the name of the editor is not included in the email from the corresponding author, remind them to submit the manuscript so we know who it is.

(0) 讚！ | Pei·Chen

How can I find out which editor an article belongs to?

(0) 讚！ | 攀登

Tossing and turning, the second article of the year, with the same friendly foreign editor, very slowly, and with very strict quality requirements for the article.

(0) 讚！ | 1wlh

Excuse me, which editor is it? It's not Marinello, is it?

(0) 讚！ | HL

Review experience:
After dragging on for a month, one of the reviewers disappeared. A few days later, three new reviewers were invited, two accepted the review but took a month to provide feedback. Yesterday, there was a request for revision and today there was a rejection. It seems like the paper has been rejected...

(0) 讚！ | zseason

After a month of delay, one of the reviewers who accepted the review ran away. A few days later, three reviewers were invited again, two of whom accepted the review. It took a month for them to provide feedback. Yesterday was the revision request deadline (rrc), and today is the deadline for the final acceptance of the paper (dip).

(0) 讚！ | zseason

A bit slow, but can only say, difficult to please

(0) 讚！ | zly