There are three reviewers in total, two of whom have already reviewed and their comments are in RRC status. Do we need to wait for the third reviewer's comments before processing the edits?

(0) 讚！ | Inspiration0925

Do we need to send an email to explain why the rework is overdue? Thank you for your response.

(0) 讚！ | MASAMI

Is there still hope? It feels like it's about to break.

(0) 讚！ | LCLLCL

The additional reviewer should be the third one because the first two opinions were very inconsistent, so the editor asked the third one to act as a referee.

(1) 讚！ | 无人在意

The progress is quite fast, but feeling anxious.
March 16, 2026 Submitted
March 19, 2026 Under review
April 13, 2026 Additional reviewer requested

(0) 讚！ | LCLLCL

Reviewer 1-2-7 has not provided any feedback for over a month and a half. Have they disappeared?

(0) 讚！ | Huang、jiang

Just finished external review, and found out it was sent to 10 reviewers. Feeling overwhelmed...Excuse me, may I ask which editor handled this? Have the following reviewers accepted the review?

(0) 讚！ | 无人在意

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 666

(0) 讚！ | Chen Kehao

May I ask if your submission has been reviewed? I have been waiting with the editor for two days.

(0) 讚！ | 一二三

My with editor has been silent for two days, has the efficiency of CG recently decreased significantly?

(0) 讚！ | 一二三

It is generally decided within two days.

(0) 讚！ | yang_k

The decision is usually made within 2 days.

(0) 讚！ | yang_k

Is it normal to still be "With Editor" after more than half a month?

(0) 讚！ | steven andy

I sent it to Professor Stavroula Kontoe in Greece, who is also part of our team.

(0) 讚！ | 白开水abc

Typo. It should be:
2025-10-06 Submission
2025-10-14 First review feedback (Major revision)
2025-11-04 Revised manuscript uploaded
2025-11-24 Acceptance
2025-11-29 Online publication

(0) 讚！ | 波波大

Super fast speed!

2025-10-06 Submission
2025-10-04 First review feedback (Major revision)
2025-11-04 Revised manuscript uploaded
2025-11-24 Accepted
2025-11-29 Online publication

(0) 讚！ | 波波大

Submitted on December 13, 2025, sent for review the next day;
Revised on January 2, 2026 (major revision), two reviewers, 13 comments, much more professional than the comments from the two so-called top journals I submitted to before;
Revised again on January 19, 2026, wrote over 30 pages of reviewer comments, sent for review the next day;
Both reviewers agreed to accept on February 3, 2026, and even wished me a happy new year;
Accepted on February 4, 2026;
Proofreading on February 5, 2026.
In conclusion, from submission to acceptance in less than two months, the review process was fast, and the editorial efficiency was high. Wishing CG a brighter future ahead!!!

(0) 讚！ | jing123

Submission in the evening of December 1, 2025.
Checked in the morning of December 2, 2025 and sent for review.
Two reviewers completed the review on December 21, 2025, Required Reviews Complete, but it happened to be Christmas holiday, so the editorial department should be on vacation.
Major revisions on the evening of January 2, 2026, with nearly 30 comments, all of which were very professional. Editor-in-chief Jidong Zhao gave 3 weeks to make revisions.
Revised on Saturday evening, January 17, 2026, with over 50 pages of responses to comments.
Submitted for review on Monday morning, January 19, 2026, to the two reviewers for the first round of review.
Both reviewers had no additional comments on February 4, 2026. Checking the peer review system, after the second reviewer submitted the suggestion for acceptance, Editor Jidong Zhao accepted it within a few hours.
Over the years, senior brothers and sisters in the research group have had a very positive evaluation of this journal, with fast speed and high quality, indeed living up to its reputation. Editor-in-chief Jidong Zhao and the teachers in the editorial department are very dedicated, wishing the journal continued success and development!

(0) 讚！ | Zanene

I have also encountered this situation before. At first, the editor may have invited someone who did not accept. Later, they will resend the invitation, but in the end, they will make a decision based on the feedback from the reviewers who have already responded.

(0) 讚！ | ForsakenMe

I submitted a total of 5 times. The first and third submissions were both handled by Professor John S. McCartney, and both were sent for external review. The second and fourth submissions were both handled by Professor Ha H. Bui, who rejected them due to poor quality. The final fifth submission was an enhanced version of the first submission, and it was once again sent to Professor Ha H. Bui, who said it did not fit the scope of the journal, even though it clearly pertained to discrete elements. Have any other experts had similar experiences?

(1) 讚！ | River_heang

You can send a message to the editor and ask if we could change the reviewer or what to do.

(0) 讚！ | ForsakenMe

Is the number of submissions real?

(0) 讚！ | Connor1122

The manuscript submitted on September 25th was sent to two reviewers for external review. One reviewer completed the review on October 31st, but the other reviewer has been delaying it until now. It's really frustrating. Should I remind the reviewer about it?

(0) 讚！ | 孤独的蓝鲸

I submitted three articles to this journal, and finally one of them was accepted. I submitted on October 20, 2025, received a major revision on December 10, 2025, and was accepted on January 2, 2026.

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦

2025.10.12 Submission
2025.11.1 Major repair
2025.11.26 Minor repair
2025.12.18 Acceptance
The progress is very fast.

(0) 讚！ | otto8