26.9.4 ST
26.9.7 WE
CBM, please love me again, begging for the soft-hearted editors and reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | Alano~

8.18 first round of rework, 9.4 second round of rework, 9.13 hired, a total of 2.5 months.

(0) 讚！ | 能发Top吗

September 13, 26 UR

(0) 讚！ | 李

From August 31 until now, WE.

(0) 讚！ | 球球 菩萨保佑我

It is becoming increasingly difficult to invest in CBM now, and the scope has also been adjusted.

(0) 讚！ | 勤奋的狗蛋

September 6, 26 ST
September 8, 26 WE
Before graduation, one more CBM, praying for good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 李

On the day of submission on August 9th, we received a rejection on August 18th, a revision and resubmission request on September 1st, and another rejection on September 8th (from a domestic reviewer, who was very critical and did not fully read the statement and explanation). Sigh, domestic reviewers don't need to be so harsh...

(0) 讚！ | 内含子

You've got the wrong channel, bro.

(0) 讚！ | YClC

First submission to CCC, note down 2026.9.5 submission as With Editor.

(1) 讚！ | 發發發

I am also waiting for the final reviewer of the second round to give feedback, but it has been 12 days and still no comments.

(0) 讚！ | 浪迹花都

There are too many manuscripts.

(0) 讚！ | Jaxon_

The third reviewer has yet to provide feedback, we are waiting on him.

(0) 讚！ | 浪迹花都

The subsequent editing gave a rejection and resubmission with the comment: "This paper appears very interesting, I suggest to the authors to present the results in two parts publication I and publication II and resubmit in this journal." Perhaps they found the workload too large, sigh.

(0) 讚！ | xttsab

Encountering editors who do not read papers and just dismiss them is not acceptable. I have filed a complaint and now it's in the hands of the editor. Many manuscripts are rejected at the STJ stage due to superficial reviews without actually reading the paper. It's a mess.

(0) 讚！ | xttsab

F**k, it's been 5 days and still no response. Hurry up and reject it, don't waste other people's time, it's disgusting.

(0) 讚！ | 内含子

Yes, there are too many submissions, it's excessive.

(0) 讚！ | 檀梦

Is CBM so disgusting now? I don't know if it has reached the hands of the editor. It was rejected the same day it was submitted, and the academic comments in the rejection letter are completely inconsistent with the content of the article. It is obvious that they only read the title and then wrote the rejection letter, without even looking at the abstract.

(0) 讚！ | xttsab

Just one hour after submission, the reviewer provided feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 檀梦

Change it back, the reviewer is so slow, why hasn't he submitted any comments yet?

(0) 讚！ | 檀梦

Is this situation also happening? It's really strange!

(0) 讚！ | 浪迹花都

I haven't submitted it yet. It's still in the process of being reviewed.

(0) 讚！ | 味大无需多盐

Now five reviewers will review the third revision, I don't know if the editor made a mistake. The second revision only had one reviewer and he pointed out minor issues, I thought it could be accepted after replying, sigh.

(0) 讚！ | YClC

I got the review pretty quickly. I submitted it on June 17th and it was sent for review on June 23rd, it seems.

(0) 讚！ | YClC

Too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 味大无需多盐

I will submit it on the 28th of last month, but it hasn't been reviewed yet.

(0) 讚！ | 味大无需多盐