| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE LetPub Score 7.3
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.9 Influence 6.4 Speed 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | CONTROL ENG PRACT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0967-0661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 16.70%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/control-engineering-practice | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/CONENGPRAC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1993 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 395每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 23.55% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0967-0661%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Sort of slow, 4-8 Week(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 13.4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 6.8 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: kyriewhy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-06 22:26:14 評論於 Really, it's so frustrating, being rejected in the second review is really annoying. The comments in the first review were all very good, some for major revisions and some for minor revisions. The one for major revisions required me to make a bunch of simulations, and I ended up writing a twenty-page response to about a dozen comments. But this guy from the second review disappeared. The one for minor revisions, on the other hand, was accepted by the original reviewer, but the total number of reviewers was not enough, so the editor invited a bunch of new reviewers. One of them accepted the review, claiming to be an expert in my field, criticized my article harshly, and then jokingly questioned why I did things the way I did. Ultimately, he rejected me, and the editor followed his opinion and rejected me as well. Everyone, go away with your bad luck. |
| 作者: LEO2480 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-29 17:25:22 評論於 Could you please advise, will the status date be updated every day when we are in the "we" state? Or will it only be updated when it has been processed and viewed? The date was updating every day for me in the first three days... |
| 作者: ZheCrystal 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-29 15:43:34 評論於 There are still reviewers who have not finished reviewing, and the editor is waiting for that reviewer. The public account cannot find the articles of this journal. |
| 作者: 王小桃 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-29 11:15:20 評論於 At that time, WE's status was under review for about a week, while UR's was for a month. Currently, RRC's status has been ongoing for a week. Is this normal? Also, I wanted to ask why I can't find the tracked articles on the public account. |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-28 09:57:47 評論於 Hello, teacher. When I returned for revisions, the chief editor asked me to add this: "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Can I just provide a brief summary of this? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-28 09:57:27 評論於 Hello teacher, during the revision, the chief editor asked to add this: "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Can you please clarify if a brief summary will suffice? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-28 09:56:56 評論於 Hello teacher, during the revision, the editor asked to add this, "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Can I just provide a brief summary of this? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-28 09:56:45 評論於 Hello teacher, during the revision process, the editor asked to add this, "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Can I just summarize it briefly? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-28 09:56:01 評論於 Hello teacher, during the rework, the editor-in-chief asked to add this: "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Could you please clarify if a brief summary is sufficient for this? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-27 17:28:07 評論於 Hello teacher, during the revision, the editor asked to add this: "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Could you please confirm if a brief summary is sufficient for this? |
| 作者: 周查 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-27 17:25:09 評論於 Hello teacher, during the rework, the chief editor asked to add this, "Provide a list of changes or a rebuttal." Can I just provide a brief summary of this? |
| 作者: Zetton1 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-24 09:21:21 評論於 Two rounds of AI review, feeling disgusted, the editor rejected it. |
| 作者: 小边skx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-20 17:11:29 評論於 I asked customer service at noon today, and yes. |
| 作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-17 20:17:43 評論於 It should be. |
| 作者: 小边skx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-16 22:09:32 評論於 Does anyone know why the review time of this journal Under Review has changed but the status has not changed? Now we can't see the specific external review status on the public account either, I don't know if the editor has invited new reviewers. |
| 作者: 小边skx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-16 16:36:09 評論於 Have any results come out now? |
| 作者: Zetton1 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-15 08:45:25 評論於 Submitted on January 24, 2026; Rejected on February 12, 2026, resubmit; Resubmitted on April 23, 2026; Re-reviewed and confirmed on April 27, 2026; Duly in print on May 14, 2026. |
| 作者: CallMeSuiyi 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-14 15:40:01 評論於 5.15 under review. |
| 作者: pq不会飞 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-13 10:25:43 評論於 Why can't my article be found on the Aiswell public account anymore? |
| 作者: kyriewhy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-10 09:09:18 評論於 The stupid bird magazine has been two weeks late and I still haven't received it. I contacted customer service once, but it was no use. |
| 作者: kyriewhy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-10 09:09:18 評論於 The silly bird journal has been delayed for two weeks and is still not here. I contacted customer service once, but it was of no use. |
| 作者: CallMeSuiyi 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-09 11:29:13 評論於 First submission to CEP, documenting: 5.5 submission, currently with editor. |
| 作者: ZheCrystal 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-08 22:16:28 評論於 Excuse me, can anyone tell me about the reputation of this journal? Is it good or just average? |
| 作者: HaozheWang 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-08 19:49:22 評論於 Hey guys, is this journal highly recognized? |
| 作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-06 14:15:27 評論於 It will be reviewed in a day or two, it mainly depends on the editor. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us