Just submitted, the editor Wei Yan rejected it, and then pointed out: "your paper does not clearly present its incremental contribution against related literature by clarifying (1), (2), (3)." The email mentioned three aspects in which the paper did not meet the requirements. Is this a standard response? Did I miss any chance?

(0) 讚！ | 陈先生

How can I see how many times an editor has invited a reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | Let_paper

Perhaps I expressed myself incorrectly. Not accepting the invitation refers to consistently not responding. I have invited that reviewer in this direction three times.

(0) 讚！ | 圆卷卷19

What should we do if the editor didn't see the previous reviewers before the first invitation and then invited new ones after the deadline had passed?

(0) 讚！ | bestAccelerator

20241010 submit
20250501 rcc
20250504 major
20250610 submit
20250611 - now ur(6,1,1)

90% of the time was spent looking for reviewers, with two of them running away after the first review. The editor is very responsible and is now looking for the last one.

(0) 讚！ | leo99

2025.04.27 submitted to journal
2025.04.29 with editor
2025.05.16 under review
2025.06.06 required reviews completed
2025.06.07 decision in process
2025.06.09 minor revision
2025.06.13 submitted revised manuscript
2025.06.14 under review
2025.07.27 required reviews completed
2025.07.28 decision in process
2025.07.29 accepted
The second review took longer than expected, mainly because one of the reviewers consistently declined review invitations. The editor was diligent and sent multiple invitations every 10 days, and eventually, on the third attempt, the reviewer agreed.
Overall, the submission experience was good, with responsible Associate Editor and high efficiency.

(1) 讚！ | 圆卷卷19

Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | bestAccelerator

Please prioritize inviting previous reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 吾日三省吾身

Thank you! Will new reviewers be invited for the revision?

(0) 讚！ | bestAccelerator

Are all three of them approved in the first trial, or is it two approvals and one rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 古神仁修

Does "reject and resubmit" mean having one reviewer recommend revisions while another recommends rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 古神仁修

This is a major renovation.

(0) 讚！ | 古神仁修

July 25 Submitted to Singapore editor
July 26 Under Review, 5 submissions accepted out of 2
P.S: After being rejected by aiaa for seven months, this speed is really impressive!

(1) 讚！ | 彬彬

Taylor Brothers, I submitted on the 15th, German editor, currently under review, 5 accepted 2.

(0) 讚！ | 吾日三省吾身

In April, I received the same result, which was a rejection on the system, but the email suggested resubmitting. I resubmitted after major revisions in June and was accepted directly in July. Feel free to make bold changes to your submission, it feels like there is no time limit for major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | dongzh

I'm dying of laughter, we were rejected two weeks later for saying that the journal didn't match.

(0) 讚！ | wenwu1

Which day did the three brothers invest in?

(0) 讚！ | 泰勒555

Northeastern Big Tooth Brother, I am an editor at Tsinghua University. There was a time when things changed, but we are still "we" after 21 days. Has your time ever changed?

(0) 讚！ | 泰勒555

The status has not changed, bro.

(0) 讚！ | 吾日三省吾身

I reflect on myself three times a day, my old brother. Has there been any change in your schedule edited by the German?

(0) 讚！ | 东北大呲花上海分花

Okay, thank you bro, I feel like the processing speed of holiday papers has been slowing down recently.

(0) 讚！ | 吾日三省吾身

Brother, I have chosen Tsinghua University. It has been 20 days, but I am still "we".

(0) 讚！ | 泰勒555

Having submitted to this journal, the editor rejected the suggestion for resubmission, but requested additional scientific contributions to the knowledge base.

(0) 讚！ | DingJun Ke

Yes, that's my response, a clear knowledge contribution.

(0) 讚！ | DingJun Ke

Classmate, is it the German editor who contributes to the knowledge system and the generalization of scientific knowledge?

(0) 讚！ | CJ111