Submitted on 9.24, UR has been pending since the next day. Can anyone please confirm whether it has been reviewed or not?

(0) 讚！ | 还行吧.

The supervisor sent an email, and the editor replied saying that it has been submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐可不乐

How do I know if it has been submitted for approval, the current system does not show whether it has been submitted for approval or not.

(1) 讚！ | iamlienze

In the field of electrocatalysis,
9.10 In Screening
9.11 Under Review
9.17 reject

(0) 讚！ | 小文

I submitted my article on 9.27, but I am also unable to generate a PDF.

(0) 讚！ | Beginner0015

There has been no change in the past two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

Submitted to Angew at the end of July, rejected two weeks later, then resubmitted to AFM. Three weeks later, received a rejection with the same template as Angew's. Had to spend a lot of time making revisions and resubmitted to AFM on 9/16. The next day, it was under review. Just before the end of the National Day holiday, found out it was being sent for review. I have never submitted to such a high-level journal before. Hopefully, this will be my lucky first time.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐可不乐

Submitted on September 22nd, UR the next day, today is October 8th, still UR, has it been sent for review or not, looking forward...

(0) 讚！ | zhuxisdust

On the 26th, UR, the new system is not sure if it has been submitted for review, and it is also unknown whether it is in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

Do friends who have recently submitted contributions know how long it generally takes from production to proof?

(1) 讚！ | 果粒多

Submitted on 9/24.
Then found that PDF cannot be generated, it has been a day already.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

AFM:
9.10 In Screening
9.11 Under Review
9.17 reject

(1) 讚！ | 小文

Submitted on April 23rd
Received the first round of review comments on June 12th, two reviewers agreed on revisions and accepted, one reviewer rejected, editor provided major revision, returned on July 1st
Received the second round of review comments on July 22nd, all three reviewers had no objections, editor raised several questions regarding whether there was AI drawing in the article, returned on July 24th
Received the third round of review comments on July 29th, editor provided suggestions on drawing and formatting, revised and returned on July 30th
Received acceptance notification email on September 3rd

(1) 讚！ | 宇宙大包子

About the work on the cross fusion of metallurgy and lithium-ion battery cathodes. Submitted on December 1, 2026. After more than a month in the hands of the editor, requested to reformat and resubmit. After the New Year, WILEY changed their system, so it could only be submitted through the official website. Then the long wait for the review began, until the end of February when the feedback was received. Four reviewers provided feedback, two positive, one neutral, and one negative. The editor provided an opportunity for revisions, emphasizing that if the reviewers were not convinced, the manuscript would be rejected. This led to students working day and night to conduct additional experiments (XPS sputtering, NMR) and resubmit the manuscript. The revised manuscript was returned the day before the deadline. Another long wait ensued, until June 2, 2026, when the feedback from the second review still required major revisions. The final reviewer raised doubts about the calibration of certain peaks in the surface chemistry characterization, so the students had to provide retested data and evidence from other sources to prove the validity of their arguments. After resubmission, another long wait ensued, until July 20, 2026, when the feedback from the third review was finally positive, with one reviewer acknowledging that "The manuscript is in good shape." They requested additional details on the washing process of comparative samples. After another round of waiting, the good news of acceptance finally arrived on September 3, 2026. The entire process took 9 months, but it was worth it in the end. It's not easy to publish in a good journal, so we must continue to work hard. Best wishes to everyone striving for top journals.

(0) 讚！ | 不二周助大哥