| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY LetPub Score 7.5
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.7 Influence 6.7 Speed 6.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | CRIT REV ONCOL HEMAT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1040-8428 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1879-0461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 1.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/critical-reviews-in-oncology-hematology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/CROH | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier Ireland Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 医学 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1983 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 264每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 30.10% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1040-8428%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: Sort of slow, 4-8 Week(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 27.3 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Ordinary 來自Elsevier的數據: 83% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 8.8 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: d1njsyg 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-28 16:43:28 評論於 6.21 Transfer submission 6.25 Received confirmation of transfer, formally submitted 6.26 with editor 8.24 Under Review 30**-3➡️4-0 8.25 Under Review 30**-5➡️6-0 8.27 Under Review 30**-6-0➡️1 8.31 Under Review 30**-6-1➡️2 8.31 Required reviews complete 30**-6-2 9.2 Review complete 30**-6-2 9.2 Decision in Process 30**-6-2 9.12 Minor revision 30**-6-2, deadline for revision 10.3 9.18 Revision With Editor 9.19 Returned due to formatting errors, revised again 9.20 Morning Under Review 9.20 Evening Required reviews complete 9.21 Morning accept |
| 作者: 头脑 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-09 10:12:08 評論於 There must be a problem with this magazine internally, based on our previous submission experiences: The first article was sent for external review and revisions were quickly made, and it was accepted in about a month, leaving a good impression. The second article was sent for external review quickly, and came back with three opinions. One was completely off base, clearly indicating that the editor had attached the wrong feedback to the article. The second opinion was nonsensical, claiming things that were clearly stated in the article were not. The third opinion was even more bizarre, clearly indicating it was AI reviewing the article, and not a very advanced AI at that, as the feedback provided was nonsensical. We patiently replied and advised the editor to be cautious of this AI feedback. Unfortunately, the editor promptly rejected the submission based on that AI reviewer's feedback, claiming it was not revised according to the feedback given. This incident reflects poorly on the irresponsibility of the editors of this magazine. Complaints were made to the editor-in-chief and the publishing house, but received no response. The third article was submitted by a graduate student in a rush to graduate, and with a sense of luck, submitted to this magazine, which had already been blacklisted by their research group. It turned out to be an even deeper trap. The submission was pending with the editor for 3 months, despite reminders sent twice. The responses were quick but the status remained unchanged, and no rejection was received. Finally, we could not bear it any longer and withdrew the submission ourselves. This magazine receives many submissions and assigns dozens of reviewers at once, which may lead to quick reviews but may also result in low quality reviews. Especially when dealing with nonsensical feedback, it can be very time-consuming, so it is strongly recommended to avoid falling into this trap! |
| 作者: 小王 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-28 11:09:39 評論於 Are you looking for commissioned articles, OP? If not, is the likelihood higher for non-commissioned articles? |
| 作者: 小王 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-28 11:08:21 評論於 Can I submit an article if a general review is not invited? Is the original poster looking for commissioned articles? |
| 作者: drunkard 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-28 00:39:00 評論於 Submit on April 7th, receive first review comments one week later, complete second review within five days after submission, and accept on April 27th, all within less than a month. |
| 作者: 依然一笑作春温 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-16 21:40:02 評論於 25.10.10 submit 25.10.27 UR (should be earlier than this) 25.11.10 major revise 25.12.10 sent back for revision (delayed due to some issues, originally only given 2 weeks, asked editor for extension) 25.12.19 accept 25.12.25 Online Overall, the efficiency was very high. More than 30 reviewers were contacted for external review, with feedback from 3 reviewers. After revisions, only one more round of feedback was needed before acceptance of the manuscript. |
| 作者: 谭泽 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-22 21:16:45 評論於 The first trial was reviewed by two reviewers and required major revisions, which were completed within 15 days. However, after one week, both reviewers disappeared. The editor took over and accepted the manuscript on the same day. It is a very reputable journal with strong credentials, outstanding speed, and a smooth submission process. |
| 作者: 枕边人 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-01 18:24:09 評論於 It only took 19 days from submission to acceptance, this journal is very fast, thumbs up! |
| 作者: 刘昕澜 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-31 09:22:31 評論於 May I ask about the follow-up results? Has the status changed? I have been waiting for nearly a month now, and I have emailed both the chief editor and the editors, but there has been no response. |
| 作者: 11jj 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-23 09:54:15 評論於 I submitted on July 26th, and the whole process was very fast. If it takes two months, you can follow up to push for the manuscript. I previously submitted to an Elsevier journal and the external review took a long time. I contacted Elsevier's customer service to help me push the editor, and a few days later it was decided. |
| 作者: recept 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-23 09:47:03 評論於 Hello, how is everything going? |
| 作者: recept 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-23 09:45:33 評論於 Just saw the submission time on another post. In this case, can we ask the editor to hurry up the submission? |
| 作者: recept 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-23 09:37:49 評論於 Hello, I would like to know when you submitted your application? It has been two months and I have not received any updates, my messages are not being replied to. |
| 作者: 11jj 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-22 21:57:53 評論於 Six people reviewed the manuscript in the first round, but when two of them came back with their opinions, the editors decided to make major revisions, causing a delay that lasted for a day. |
| 作者: 施景龙 SHI 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-20 23:41:39 評論於 May I ask how many people are reviewing the first round, and have you experienced a dip before? |
| 作者: 11jj 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-19 14:13:01 評論於 Immunotherapy for tumors. |
| 作者: 刘昕澜 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-15 23:50:01 評論於 Hello! May I ask which sector's overview did you invest in? |
| 作者: 施景龙 SHI 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-15 19:19:36 評論於 What direction are you writing in? Is it a summary? |
| 作者: 施景龙 SHI 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-15 19:18:15 評論於 What direction are you writing in? Can I ask? |
| 作者: 11jj 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-14 15:03:18 評論於 A very pleasant submission experience. The first time encountering such a fast process (unbelievable) 7.26 Submit to the journal 7.29 With editor 7.29 Under Review 8.1 RRC 8.1 Major revision 8.5 Revision submit 8.7 RRC 8.7 Accept 8.8 Online |
| 作者: recept 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-11 08:45:29 評論於 The speed is too slow, it has been over a month and I have sent three letters but received no response. |
| 作者: 吡啡尼酮 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-02 13:45:41 評論於 With editor for 2 months, under review for 6 months, still unable to find reviewers. Major revisions at 9 months. Accepted after minor revisions at 11 months. Please consider carefully if urgent. |
| 作者: 鑫钰baby 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-15 15:21:18 評論於 Research focus: tumors; sharing experiences with solid tumors: Where did the magazine editor go? No news for two months with the editor. |
| 作者: 碧水傲文 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-04-28 10:41:04 評論於 How did you find the email address of the editor-in-chief? |
| 作者: 无妄迎真 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-02-25 13:17:22 評論於 Is there any news now? |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us