How long does the second trial take?

(0) 讚！ | lacyhhh

I sent my article to 5 reviewers, 4 of whom accepted the review. The review process was completed in about 20 days.

(0) 讚！ | COCO87

How long does it generally take for the reviewers of this journal to provide feedback after accepting a review?

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的辣椒酱

Submission: Feb 14, 2025
UR: Feb 26, 2025
RRC: Mar 11, 2025
Major Rev: Apr 3, 2025
Revised Submission: Apr 13, 2025
UR: Apr 17, 2025
RRC: Apr 24, 2025
DIP: Apr 25, 2025

(1) 讚！ | COCO87

That update on Apr 07 was an update of WE.

(0) 讚！ | WineCool

Mar 27, 2025
Apr 07, 2025
No news so far, withdrew the submission yesterday, still pending at WE.

(0) 讚！ | WineCool

It has been almost a week since "Under review" status and no reviewers have accepted the review request. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的辣椒酱

4.9 With editor
4.18 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的辣椒酱

Could you please tell me how many reviewers are usually needed for this publication?

(0) 讚！ | chole

Reply to yyyyj: My first-instance RRC was given a major revision the day after, for reference.

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

How long does it take for RRC to give feedback after the first review? It feels like RRC has been ongoing for 2 days with no response. I have invited 9 reviewers through the plugin, 4 have accepted and completed their reviews. How many more days will RRC last?

(0) 讚！ | yyyyj

Reply reading while feeding pigs: single-blind

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

My major revision was returned, one of the reviewers disappeared, the editor invited another reviewer, and the third reviewer provided several comments. Best wishes.

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

The processing speed of DSP is very unpredictable, sometimes very slow and other times extremely fast.

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

Reply to cv-master: I am not sure about your state. The two revisions I made were labeled as "temporary decisions" in the email, but the submission system clearly distinguishes between major revisions and minor revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

The submission was made at 11pm on the evening of April 25, 2016, and the status changed to "with editor" immediately after submission. By 9am on April 17, 2016, it was already "under review". Is this timeframe too fast?

(0) 讚！ | chole

2024.9.1 STJ
2024.9.2 WE
2024.9.5 UR
2025.3.5 Major revision
2025.3.18 Rework
2025.4.4 UR
It is still UR until now. One of the reviewers has completed the review, but the other one has been delaying. If the second reviewer runs away, will the editor-in-chief invite new reviewers again? I'm really afraid of another reviewer coming, this journal is really slow.

(0) 讚！ | Accept

Hello, may I ask if this submission is double-blind?

(0) 讚！ | 一边读书一边喂猪

May I ask how long does it usually take for WE?

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的辣椒酱

Open a pit to record: Mar 27, 2025
WE: Mar 28, 2025 (one or two days, it seems)
WE: 11 Apr 2025

(0) 讚！ | WineCool

24.9.12 we
25.1.10 ur
25.2.10 rrc
25.3.15 Major Repair
25.4.7 Accept
Lasted for 7 months, grateful.

(1) 讚！ | LiVANA

Why is my revision categorized as revise-general, 20 days? Is this a minor revision or a major revision? I don't understand.

(0) 讚！ | cv-master

Update
4.04 Minor revisions
4.09 Resubmit revised manuscript
4.09 Acceptance (received 1 hour after resubmission)
Summary: Except for the initial first round of reviews, which took over 2 months, the subsequent process was relatively fast. The entire submission process took a little over 5 months. This information is provided for reference.

(1) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

Reply to LiVANA: I don't think it's a problem. I have never submitted a highlight, and I also had a compressed file when I first submitted the latex. The two revisions after that were also done by unpacking my compressed file, and there was no directory structure. Don't worry, best wishes.

(0) 讚！ | 你爱池鱼嘛

The staff of the partition seems to always rank the journals with a high proportion of Chinese people and more investments. "DSP" has always been recognized as an international top journal in the field of signal processing, the absolute king of journals in the field of signal processing, and has a solid second-tier TOP level in the same field. Look at the units, individuals, and article quality published in this journal. If this continues to be divided so chaotically, it is purely deceiving outsiders and will only accelerate the loss of credibility of the partition, eventually turning it into a joke. It's speechless!

(1) 讚！ | 88886666