Dear future academicians, two days after submission, the status changed to "Decision in Process." Looks like it's going to be a rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 不想读了

Two reviewers, one with almost no comments, and the other saying it is not innovative enough (listed 8 comments, clearly a Chinese reviewer), let's fight again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | Manjusri

How did the appeal turn out? I have had similar experiences before.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白369

I was rejected in 30 seconds, I received a rejection email while still in the process of submitting. It doesn't affect me at all, I will just move on to the next submission.

(0) 讚！ | zhangjiazhen

Appealed. Not sure what the next steps will be.

(0) 讚！ | 22002

Too frustrating. I have been submitting for 11 months, rejected after revisions based on reviewer comments, with no reasons or feedback provided by the editorial board. The editor handling my submission has been unresponsive and each stage has been very slow. It is disappointing to wait 11 months for a journal submission only to be rejected without explanation.

(1) 讚！ | 22002

I submitted to this journal for the second time, and this time it went much more smoothly than the last time. I am grateful to the editor, the efficiency is really high. The process I went through is as follows:
2025.01.29 submitted
2025.02.20 revision
2025.03.15 revision submitted
2025.03.19 revision
2025.03.21 revision submitted
2025.03.22 accepted

(0) 讚！ | kirito@

The high proportion of Chinese people should not be used as a warning standard, unless it is assumed that Chinese papers are all fraudulent. Moreover, the majority of Chinese-owned SCI journals also have a high proportion of Chinese people, so how can we support them if we issue warnings?

(0) 讚！ | Cavatina

Who would have thought that the Chinese Academy of Sciences directly excluded the high proportion of Chinese people, and all the warnings turned into paper factories. It was really a decision made on a whim. Although the quality of ECOIND may not be high, it is unlikely to cause any trouble in the future. It is worth investing in.

(0) 讚！ | Rainmoon

Who would have thought that the Chinese Academy of Sciences directly excluded the item of too high a proportion of Chinese people, and all the warnings turned into paper factories. It was really decided on a whim. In this way, although the quality of ECOIND is not high, there will be no problems in the future. It is still worth investing.

(0) 讚！ | Rainmoon

How do you say it now? Reverse warning?

(0) 讚！ | 是时候放弃科研了

Went through several rounds of revisions.

(0) 讚！ | NS-snail

24 years is not without partition.

(0) 讚！ | kapibala123

Based on the zoning of that year.

(0) 讚！ | dangdang1

So, how is the scoring calculated? I submitted it last year, accepted at the end of January this year, and published at the beginning of February. Should it still be classified as a second-tier publication?

(0) 讚！ | Z

How to determine the journal ranking for a paper published 24 years ago?

(0) 讚！ | kapibala123

At the beginning of last year, the total environment allowed me to switch to Indicators, it seems I have to thank the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 看云卷云舒

The ecological indicators have all increased by one level, hurry up and invest in time!!! Envious of those who have boarded the train.

(1) 讚！ | SLDX

2024-11-20 Revise (Round 1) 1 expert opinion
2025-01-03 Revise (Round 2) 2 expert opinions, the one from Round 1 disappeared
2025-02-25 Revise (Round 3) 2 expert opinions
2025-03-06 Accept Almost 150 days have passed

(0) 讚！ | 啃论文小白

I don't even know what to say! It's the first time I've encountered something so speechless! After waiting for eight months without an expert, it was rejected for revision within an hour of submission! It's so frustrating!

(0) 讚！ | 智慧女孩不秃头

Similarly, no one is reviewing the manuscript, the editors have sent it multiple times, and now they have submitted it 20 times, but only one reviewer has accepted it. It seems that it is difficult to find reviewers now.

(0) 讚！ | NS-snail

2024.10.27 submitted
2024.12.02 revision
2024.12.31 revision submitted
2025.01.21 revision
2025.02.09 revision submitted
2025.02.27 accepted

It took four months to finally be accepted. Overall, the process was relatively fast and the impact factor is also quite high. Everything was good except for the expensive APC.

(0) 讚！ | Cavatina

Brother, have you heard any news? I submitted my article for the New Year, but there has been no one to review it yet.

(0) 讚！ | 小赵

How about this journal? I plan to submit, but I heard the difficulty has increased.

(0) 讚！ | Manjusri

How are you, bro? It's been 3 weeks and no one has reviewed my work.

(0) 讚！ | 小赵