July 25, 2025 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | Fortnight

Last year, my first submission was rejected after 1 hour. The second submission was delayed for 2 weeks and was still "with editor". After sending a reminder email, it was rejected again, with the reason being the editor's health issues and failure to handle it in a timely manner. Currently, the third submission has been "with editor" for a week.

(0) 讚！ | 三浪

The manuscript that was submitted four weeks ago is still with the editor after being revised.

(0) 讚！ | 阿宽吖

I want to ask if there is any news. I have been waiting for 2 weeks for a response.

(0) 讚！ | hypochron

Normal submission, not a special issue submission, why does the submission ID include S(ECOLIND-S-25-XXXXX)?

(0) 讚！ | huoh

Can you please send an email to remind them to review the manuscript if it has been more than two months since the external audit?

(0) 讚！ | WGX1005

After reading through this series of comments, do you think water resources are relatively better?

(0) 讚！ | DrXing

I haven't received a successful submission email yet, did they reject me directly?

(0) 讚！ | 臭屁懒猪猪

It seems like it, I am the same, not yet submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | zhuduiyou

When I submitted to JH, I also encountered a reviewer who used AI all the time. I really want to know how the AI reviewer eventually got you through?

(0) 讚！ | 看云卷云舒

Good pitches, love to pitch, will continue to pitch. Applied on March 21, 2025 for the district exam, accepted on June 6th. Three rounds of review, some reviewers used AI continuously, which was very disgusting.

(0) 讚！ | 多发论文哦

I haven't encountered this kind of situation before either.

(0) 讚！ | Er_white

Bro, I am exactly like you.

(0) 讚！ | Z1Hui

Is there a step to recommend reviewers during the submission stage?

(0) 讚！ | zjmm

Do you have any friends who have recently applied? I wanted to ask how long does it usually take for the status to be updated? I saw on the official website that it only takes 1 day...

(0) 讚！ | hypochron

I submitted my application on April 28th, and it is still under review. Can you please explain what this means?

(0) 讚！ | zy

Dear future academicians, two days after submission, the status changed to "Decision in Process." Looks like it's going to be a rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 不想读了

Two reviewers, one with almost no comments, and the other saying it is not innovative enough (listed 8 comments, clearly a Chinese reviewer), let's fight again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | Manjusri

How did the appeal turn out? I have had similar experiences before.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白369

I was rejected in 30 seconds, I received a rejection email while still in the process of submitting. It doesn't affect me at all, I will just move on to the next submission.

(0) 讚！ | zhangjiazhen

Appealed. Not sure what the next steps will be.

(0) 讚！ | 22002

Too frustrating. I have been submitting for 11 months, rejected after revisions based on reviewer comments, with no reasons or feedback provided by the editorial board. The editor handling my submission has been unresponsive and each stage has been very slow. It is disappointing to wait 11 months for a journal submission only to be rejected without explanation.

(1) 讚！ | 22002

I submitted to this journal for the second time, and this time it went much more smoothly than the last time. I am grateful to the editor, the efficiency is really high. The process I went through is as follows:
2025.01.29 submitted
2025.02.20 revision
2025.03.15 revision submitted
2025.03.19 revision
2025.03.21 revision submitted
2025.03.22 accepted

(0) 讚！ | kirito@

The high proportion of Chinese people should not be used as a warning standard, unless it is assumed that Chinese papers are all fraudulent. Moreover, the majority of Chinese-owned SCI journals also have a high proportion of Chinese people, so how can we support them if we issue warnings?

(0) 讚！ | Cavatina

Who would have thought that the Chinese Academy of Sciences directly excluded the high proportion of Chinese people, and all the warnings turned into paper factories. It was really a decision made on a whim. Although the quality of ECOIND may not be high, it is unlikely to cause any trouble in the future. It is worth investing in.

(0) 讚！ | Rainmoon