I want to ask you, with the editor, how long does it take for you to be under review?

(0) 讚！ | SDAU-ZZW

Can I ask how long it takes to receive the first decision?

(0) 讚！ | wanwan

I would like to ask how long it took for the first decision to be made afterwards.

(0) 讚！ | wanwan

It's too slow. I submitted it at the end of May, made the format changes at the beginning of June, and it still hasn't been submitted for review. I've been pushing for it but there's been no response.

(0) 讚！ | zxt1111

Just wanted to ask if you are studying toxicology? And how intensive is the workload for your studies?

(0) 讚！ | P.yang

The editing speed is okay, but it's really frustrating when the reviewers don't accept it.

(0) 讚！ | 尼可莱

The editor has sent it to 10 reviewers, but it's been 10 days and none of them have accepted the review.

(0) 讚！ | 尼可莱

Yes, the editing process used to be very quick, but this time I submitted on April 20th and it is still being edited now.

(0) 讚！ | yanqi

Submitted on April 18, 2026 - currently with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 安溪铅酸

The submission period is three months. Thank you, Chief Editor Shi. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 西西

The process of submitting this paper was not easy, but we finally met a good editor.
January 29, 2026 with editor
February 3, 2026 under review
March 8, 2026 major revisions from three reviewers
March 28, 2026 resubmission
March 31, 2026 under review
April 16, 2026 acceptance
Thanks to the editor and reviewers, the process was fast and the revised version was accepted directly. I hope we will all encounter such good editors and experts again.

(0) 讚！ | 西西

Submit 2025.3.25
Under review 4.1
Major revision 8.18
Resubmit 8.28
With editor 8.31
Under review 9.6
Major Revision 12.10
Resubmit 12.25
Under Review 12.27
Major Revision 2026.4.1 Thanks to the editor Yan's decision
Resubmit/With editor 4.14
Accept 4.15
Edited by Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman

This article has been through a bumpy road, experiencing 3 rounds of major revisions. After the first major revision, both reviewers disappeared; after the second major revision, 3 new reviewers returned with 2 of them providing feedback, while the third reviewer never responded. On 2026.3.17, the editor surprisingly sent the article to new reviewers for external review, causing frustration as the article had already been through almost a year of review. In desperation, an email was sent to the editorial department requesting a decision based on the feedback from the 2 reviewers. Finally, Editor Yan intervened, providing a final round of revision without sending it for external review, and ultimately accepting the article.

(1) 讚！ | Yu

My friend, what's going on? The submission process is different than usual.

(0) 讚！ | yanqi

Has anyone encountered this status?

(0) 讚！ | 星辰

After submission, it shows "Submission Received via Ingest" for a week, what is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 楚天舒001

The review results will be notified in two months, but in reality, it actually took 4-5 months in total.

(0) 讚！ | Dr.ZMom

Thank you Editor Yan. Very efficient and extremely responsible: the processing speed was very fast, and despite the difficulty in finding capable reviewers, three rounds of review invitations were sent out. The feedback from the reviewers who accepted the invitations was also very valuable, and we added 2 large figures and a table, ultimately leading to acceptance. Deeply grateful.

(1) 讚！ | Dr.ZMom

On the 12th, we are still we, it doesn't feel as fast as everyone says.

(0) 讚！ | Dr.契切林

Hmm, I got it.

(0) 讚！ | casufa

After a minor revision, it was changed according to the editor's suggestions, and then it was accepted directly. Thank you very much, Editor Chen.

(1) 讚！ | DClin

Have you submitted your application? Mine has been in editing for over a week and hasn't moved.

(0) 讚！ | shuidaoerhao

I gave it another look to the reviewer. But I read it quickly and accepted it quickly.

(0) 讚！ | suleyman

25-12-26 submit to journal;
25-12-26 with editor
Hope to be sent for external review soon, please be lenient, Editor.

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦elf

12.19 minor revision was given 20 days.

(0) 讚！ | DClin

The journal editorial team is efficient, and the reviewers are insightful and able to provide constructive review comments. The key is the short review period, and the editors will actively offer you help. Thank you very much to the editors and reviewers, and I wish EES to become better and better.

(0) 讚！ | gongtongde1