| 期刊簡介 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE LetPub Score 7.2
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.2 Influence 6.6 Speed 7.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | ADV ENG SOFTW | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0965-9978 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1873-5339 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.50%自引率趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/advances-in-engineering-software | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/ADES | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier Ltd | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 142每年文章數趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 18.39% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0965-9978%5BISSN%5D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 6.2 Week(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy 來自Elsevier的數據: 17% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 8.3 Week(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 咋搞捏? 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-24 11:17:38 評論於 Have you got any results yet? I submitted on 7.16 and it is still with the editor. |
| 作者: Jeenching 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-29 17:24:36 評論於 Indeed, this journal is a bit strange, as no one besides the author can see the review process progress. |
| 作者: lgdzjy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-23 16:06:56 評論於 The first round involves three reviewers and major revisions. The second round involves two reviewers, with one major revision and one acceptance. The third round involves one reviewer and major revisions. The fourth round involves one reviewer. |
| 作者: lgdzjy 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-23 16:04:59 評論於 The fourth round of review was rejected. Three days ago, I even sent it for external review, but the reviewers had not even received my response, and Jung-Wuk Hong, the editor, rejected it directly. The reason given was lack of novelty and they have received too many articles. Speechless. It was submitted before the Chinese New Year, and now half a year has passed like this. |
| 作者: z乐意 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-21 09:42:30 評論於 April 20, 2026 Submitted to WE April 22, 2026 Under review by editor May 17, 2026 Major revision requested by RRC on the same day May 26, 2026 Revised and resubmitted to WE May 28, 2026 Under review by editor June 18, 2026 Under review by RRC June 20, 2026 Accepted This is the second time submitting to this journal, with the last submission being in 2023. The entire submission process took exactly two months, and I appreciate the quick handling of the manuscript by Professor Jung-Wuk Hong, the editor from South Korea. The feedback from the three reviewers was mostly positive, all of whom are peers in the relevant field. There were a total of 13 comments, which were addressed in a few days before resubmission. The journal's Impact Factor has now risen to 6.3, and the CiteScore is also in the top 10%. I wish the journal continued success and increasing influence. |
| 作者: sajiasheng 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-09 11:09:49 評論於 The first revision was completed, and after the rework, all three reviewers agreed to accept the submission. However, there are still some formatting issues that need to be fixed before resubmission. It has been over 20 days now, and the status is still "With Editor". Sending reminder emails has not been successful. Beware of the chief editor P** I**. |
| 作者: 嘤嘤嘤小喇叭 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-22 23:59:49 評論於 I remember rejecting pretty quickly, and I switched to. |
| 作者: 一口华子定乾坤 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-22 15:41:37 評論於 Hello, may I ask if this journal is reviewed quickly this year? |
| 作者: 麦当劳肯德基哪个好吃 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-22 15:32:33 評論於 Hello, I would like to ask if there is any progress. |
| 作者: 落尘尘 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-08 16:04:51 評論於 I have already been rejected twice by other journals, each time taking a month. I hope this journal can be faster. |
| 作者: XIANGYU LI 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-07 14:00:46 評論於 Excuse me, what is your number? I'm currently debating whether to apply for this, as it seems like the acceptance rate is very low. Are you still at STJ? |
| 作者: zgchxj 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-07 10:42:46 評論於 How many days has it been with the editor? Has it been submitted for review? |
| 作者: zgchxj 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-07 10:39:21 評論於 I have been submitting for several days, but the Status Date has not changed. The editor has not reviewed it yet. The editorial team of this small journal is understaffed, so once the submission volume increases slightly, it becomes backlogged. Now we can only wait and hope that the editor will review it quickly. |
| 作者: Yousayyds 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-27 17:25:05 評論於 I can't see the status, and I can't see my work either. Submitted WE on 4.22. Currently no results. |
| 作者: 嘤嘤嘤小喇叭 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-26 11:12:22 評論於 Only the corresponding author can view it. |
| 作者: 比耶2 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-26 10:41:18 評論於 Could I ask the submission experts, is the first author unable to view the status of the manuscript in the system, and only the corresponding author can view it? I closed the webpage before the PDF was generated when submitting the manuscript, and then the corresponding author approved it. However, I do not have online information about the manuscript on my end. Is this normal? |
| 作者: 比耶2 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-23 21:17:59 評論於 Hello, may I ask if the first author is unable to view the status of the manuscript in the system, and only the corresponding author can check it? |
| 作者: wyx2333 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-30 10:22:13 評論於 Korean editing is going viral. Submitted on January 28th, reviewed on January 31st, and consistently contacted potential contributors twice a week. Regardless of whether the review comments are completed or need revisions, they are dealt with on the same day. Accepted on March 28th. Wishing your publication greater success in the future. |
| 作者: 冬马kaze 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-06 16:06:28 評論於 A few days after submission, it was sent for review, during which 13 reviewers were contacted but none reviewed the manuscript. It was rejected directly one month later. However, we are still grateful to the editor from Korea for their high efficiency in handling the submission. Hope to meet again in the future. |
| 作者: king_tiger 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-22 09:23:27 評論於 We are very slow, taking 13 days, and the result returned does not meet the journal's scope. |
| 作者: 骑着狼放羊 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-07 15:28:59 評論於 I submitted quite a lot. I submitted my manuscript on the 19th of last month, and the manuscript number is already over 1950. 10.19 submitted 10.23 under review, reviewed by 2 people 10.28 added another reviewer 11.06 reviewed by 2 people completed |
| 作者: Ddavinci 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-09 14:11:33 評論於 Brother, are there many reviewers? Which reviewer should I choose to get a quicker review? I see some posters below have been waiting for 24 years for their submissions to be reviewed, it's really slow. |
| 作者: 张馍馍 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-09 08:48:26 評論於 How come you're so fast~ I submitted 10 days ago and it's still with editor. |
| 作者: zgh0220 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-06 19:51:42 評論於 Record of submission process: 2025.06.28 with editor 2025.06.28 under review 2025.07.23 required review completed 2025.07.25 major revision 2025.08.19 with editor 2025.08.20 under review 2025.09.04 required review completed 2025.09.06 accept The journal's processing speed is very fast. You can choose the editor Hong Zhengxu from South Korea, who is very efficient. There were a total of four reviewers, one directly rejected the submission, while three provided revision suggestions. There were a total of 23 suggestions, and one month was given for revisions. The questions raised by the experts were very good, and the revisions were completed in about half a month. However, due to personal vacation, the revisions were only sent back on the 19th. It took 70 days from submission to acceptance, and I was quite happy to submit to SCI for the first time. Thanks to the editor and reviewers. |
| 作者: yiyiww 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-15 09:46:38 評論於 Do you need a double-blind mode? |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us