Korean editing is going viral. Submitted on January 28th, reviewed on January 31st, and consistently contacted potential contributors twice a week. Regardless of whether the review comments are completed or need revisions, they are dealt with on the same day. Accepted on March 28th. Wishing your publication greater success in the future.

(0) 讚！ | wyx2333

A few days after submission, it was sent for review, during which 13 reviewers were contacted but none reviewed the manuscript. It was rejected directly one month later. However, we are still grateful to the editor from Korea for their high efficiency in handling the submission. Hope to meet again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 冬马kaze

We are very slow, taking 13 days, and the result returned does not meet the journal's scope.

(0) 讚！ | king_tiger

I submitted quite a lot. I submitted my manuscript on the 19th of last month, and the manuscript number is already over 1950. 
10.19 submitted
10.23 under review, reviewed by 2 people
10.28 added another reviewer
11.06 reviewed by 2 people completed

(0) 讚！ | 骑着狼放羊

Brother, are there many reviewers? Which reviewer should I choose to get a quicker review? I see some posters below have been waiting for 24 years for their submissions to be reviewed, it's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | Ddavinci

How come you're so fast~ I submitted 10 days ago and it's still with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 张馍馍

Record of submission process:
2025.06.28 with editor
2025.06.28 under review
2025.07.23 required review completed
2025.07.25 major revision
2025.08.19 with editor
2025.08.20 under review
2025.09.04 required review completed
2025.09.06 accept

The journal's processing speed is very fast. You can choose the editor Hong Zhengxu from South Korea, who is very efficient. There were a total of four reviewers, one directly rejected the submission, while three provided revision suggestions. There were a total of 23 suggestions, and one month was given for revisions. The questions raised by the experts were very good, and the revisions were completed in about half a month. However, due to personal vacation, the revisions were only sent back on the 19th. It took 70 days from submission to acceptance, and I was quite happy to submit to SCI for the first time. Thanks to the editor and reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | zgh0220

Do you need a double-blind mode?

(0) 讚！ | yiyiww

Submitted on October 5th, 24
Major revision on January 16th, 25
Revised on February 17th, 25
Major revision on March 10th, 25
Revised on March 17th, 25
Accepted on April 12th, 25

(0) 讚！ | gogogo91

For the first submission, this journal does not require a template. Just include line numbers, single-column layout, fund information, and author contribution statements as the basic requirements.

(0) 讚！ | 二狗闯世界

Could you please provide me with the guidelines from the author instructions section? Do you have a template available?

(0) 讚！ | qqiuuu

Brother, is this not your first time investing? It's happening so quickly.

(0) 讚！ | tyy6142

Sorry, but I need the original text in order to provide an accurate translation.

(0) 讚！ | tanking666

For so many years, District 2 has been stable, but now it has changed to District 3. Just published the paper... sigh.

(0) 讚！ | junfhappy

Submission timeline is as follows:
January 1, 2025: Submission
January 20, 2025: Minor revision
January 28, 2025: Major revision
February 13, 2025: Minor revision requested by editor due to reference issues, manuscript can be accepted after revision
February 13, 2025: Major revision
March 3, 2025: Accepted
March 4, 2025: Proof.

(1) 讚！ | 二狗闯世界

The editor said it was out of scope and rejected it directly.

(0) 讚！ | undefined

December 19th with editor

(0) 讚！ | undefined

Submit by December 18th.

(0) 讚！ | undefined

On October 26th, two people accepted the invitation for review. One person completed the review quickly, and it is speculated that they were a reviewer with almost no modifications in the first round of review. The second person did not provide feedback on the review even after a month had passed.

On November 20th, a third person was sent for review, and on November 22nd, a fourth person was sent for review.

The fourth person accepted the invitation.

On December 6th, the review was completed, and revisions were made based on the feedback from two reviewers.

On December 8th, the paper was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | junfhappy

10.19 Revised
10.21 Under review, sent to 2 reviewers (presumably the original reviewers)
10.22 Accepted review invitation from 1 person (review completed on the same day)
10.26 Accepted review invitations from 2 people

(0) 讚！ | junfhappy

Under review on October 11, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | 决一逍遥

2024.10.05 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 决一逍遥

2024.09.30 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 十年旧梦寻心

Can be invested.

(0) 讚！ | tanking666

The review speed is still fast.

(0) 讚！ | tanking666