31st May 2025 submitted
7th June 2025 initial assessment
8th June 2025 in peer review
25th June 2025 major revision (2 reviewers)
6th July 2025 submitted
There was a delay due to an error in the editing of one reviewer's comments
22nd July 2025 accepted

(0) 讚！ | 米兰的小铁匠

3.13 submitted
3.19 with editor and in peer review
4.22 major revision
6.1 submitted
6.10 accept

(0) 讚！ | Right

It has not reached the editor's hands in ten days!!!

(0) 讚！ | haheihei

5.29 with editor

(0) 讚！ | zjf1993

5.19 SUBMITTED
5.28 Still in Initial assessment
Not sure what's going on

(0) 讚！ | zjf1993

The submission email will receive a "Track the progress of your Energy & Environmental Science submission" email, which contains a link to track the status of your manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | Shaw Fang

May I ask where can I find information on where to see the reviewers accepting the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | 情定

2.5 submitted
2.10 with editor
2.11 in peer review
2.23 1 reviewer agreed
3.1 1 reviewer agreed; 1 review received
3.8 in peer review; 2 reviewers agreed; 1 review received
3.15 in peer review; 2 reviewers agreed; 2 reviews received
3.31 in peer review; 3 reviewers agreed; 2 reviews received
4.2 in peer review; 3 reviewers agreed; 3 reviews received
4.3 major revision (2 Minor Revision, 1 Reject)
4.18 reminder
4.22 submitted
4.22 with editor
4.22 in peer review
5.6 accept

(0) 讚！ | Shaw Fang

After arbitration, the editor will find an arbitration reviewer, but will the submission status change from "in peer review" to "with editor"?

(0) 讚！ | 飘来飘去的蒲公英

Not quite suitable for the journal, transfer to another journal. 
2025.4.23 Checking submission and files
2025.4.23 Initial assessment
2025.5.1 With editor
2025.5.6 transfer

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

Do we need to show the revised draft to the previous reviewers after submission?

(0) 讚！ | Shaw Fang

Data availability statements for Energy & Environmental Science are not available on the homepage.

(0) 讚！ | 秋秋无语了

What are the Data availability statements for Energy & Environmental Science? There is no information on the homepage.

(0) 讚！ | 秋秋无语了

Does the longer our time, the greater the probability of rejection?

(0) 讚！ | A_Ac

The first review took a long time, and it seemed to be due to the editor's reasons. After each reviewer completed their review, the editor would then invite the next reviewer, causing a significant delay.

(0) 讚！ | HPPsz

Please translate the following passage into English: 04.01 Accept

(0) 讚！ | HPPsz

2025.02.22 EES-minor revision
2025.03.12 EES-resubmitted to revision
2025.03.13 EES-Accepted
Thank you for the editors and reviewers' kindness. 
The second revision of EES during my master's degree has arrived~

(0) 讚！ | 离子迁移火花

Inviting two people at once

(0) 讚！ | 离子迁移火花

Unable to see.

(0) 讚！ | 离子迁移火花

Why is this journal classified as materials?

(0) 讚！ | hw

Is the reason it took so long to review because there was no reviewer willing to review it?

(0) 讚！ | Shaw Fang

02.17 Major Revision. 3 reviewers, 2 revisions, 1 transfer. No specific deadline given by the editor for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | HPPsz

May I ask if, after the submission system shows "with editor", can we see which editor has been assigned by following the tracking link?

(0) 讚！ | 飘来飘去的蒲公英

2.25已提交
Please, editor, be more lenient.

(0) 讚！ | maddog

May I ask if two reviewers were invited simultaneously or if one reviewer completes the review before inviting another?

(0) 讚！ | Shaw Fang