May I ask how to check the progress?

(0) 讚！ | chic

Bro, I saw your comment under JPSE before, looks like we are in the same industry.

(0) 讚！ | 挖油小队突击手

After being under review, it has been over a month and we still have not received comments on the revised manuscript. When we checked with the plugin, we found that out of the four reviewers, only one has completed the review, while the others have all expired.

(0) 讚！ | Fuguydfd

After submitting for a month, I have received feedback from four reviewers, three of whom have already passed their deadlines. Only one reviewer has completed the review. What should I do next?

(0) 讚！ | Fuguydfd

Hello, how are things going? Has it changed to "in peer review" after submission? How long does it usually take for review?

(0) 讚！ | 林泽宇

Have you received it?

(0) 讚！ | hhxxv

2025.03.23 Submitted
2025.05.13 Major Revision Four reviewers, three minor revisions and one major revision, given one month
2025.06.12 Revised resubmitted
2025.06.20 Accept
Overall, the process was quite fast, with a delay on my part during the revision process. The time from submission to acceptance was 3 months, which is in line with the average acceptance speed of this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 房山季鸟猴

Did this editor only send it to two reviewers in total?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Did this editor send the manuscript to two reviewers in total?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Hello, moderator, you don't send emails for review, right?

(0) 讚！ | 逢投必中01

So many invitations? Which editor?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Which editor is this? It's so terrifying.

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

May I ask how many reviewers this editor has sent to? Is it a lot?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

How many reviewers did this editor send it to?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Excuse me, how many reviewers does this editor have?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Hello, may I ask if an email will be sent to notify about the review meeting now?

(0) 讚！ | 逢投必中01

Does Fateme Rezaei only handle manuscripts on Wednesdays? My minor revision feedback hasn't been addressed yet.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

Hello, may I ask how the status of your submission to Energy & Fuels is after receiving it? How can I tell if it has been sent for review or not? Will I receive an email if it is sent for review? I haven't even received an email assigning me a handling editor.

(0) 讚！ | 云一生

The new system is now in place, and I have no idea where to find the submission for review. It's really annoying.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

I was very quick at that time, and I accepted the return in two days.

May I ask, what is the current status of assignment editing and submission review?

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

I want to ask how long it will take for a major repair, a minor repair, and a second review. I'm a bit in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

May I ask if the manuscript is currently under review or in peer review with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

Excuse me, have you encountered the issue of "File will not display in proof" when resubmitting for rework? I have uploaded my document multiple times and keep getting this error message. I also cannot generate a PDF when checking before submission. I am hesitant to submit directly as the due date is approaching. If you have time, could you please provide some guidance?

(0) 讚！ | AAA快乐小狗

The article I wrote, "Correlation between Natural Seepage and Ionic Diffusion in Shales," is my sixth publication in SCI, and it is also the first time I have submitted to a higher-quality journal in Zone 3. The structure of my paper involves conducting data correlation analysis through three different categories of small experiments. Finally, after studying some thin section photos of core samples, I drew a cartoon-style conception of the internal structure of shale, discussed the source of external fluid ions, and wrote a simple mechanistic analysis. My three experiments used the data from the first two experiments for correlation analysis, and the last experiment demonstrated my mechanistic hypothesis. In fact, my first two experiments are very common, and previous researchers have also done data correlation analysis. I simply supplemented the third experiment for verification, refined the process of correlation analysis, and thus arrived at the mechanism of external fluid ion sources, which I illustrated with a cartoon. I share this method of finding highlights in mechanisms through extension experiments with everyone. For more details, you can refer to my paper. 

Regarding the review process, there were a total of five reviewer comments, two from foreigners and three from Chinese reviewers. The foreigners requested a more detailed explanation of the cartoon illustration, while the Chinese reviewers asked for simplification of the background explanation and specific analysis of the fluctuations in several steps and data columns in the experimental data graphs.

(0) 讚！ | 油条

The distribution editor will send an email.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt