So many invitations? Which editor?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Which editor is this? It's so terrifying.

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

May I ask how many reviewers this editor has sent to? Is it a lot?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

How many reviewers did this editor send it to?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Excuse me, how many reviewers does this editor have?

(0) 讚！ | waaaaa98

Hello, may I ask if an email will be sent to notify about the review meeting now?

(0) 讚！ | 逢投必中01

Does Fateme Rezaei only handle manuscripts on Wednesdays? My minor revision feedback hasn't been addressed yet.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

Hello, may I ask how the status of your submission to Energy & Fuels is after receiving it? How can I tell if it has been sent for review or not? Will I receive an email if it is sent for review? I haven't even received an email assigning me a handling editor.

(0) 讚！ | 云一生

The new system is now in place, and I have no idea where to find the submission for review. It's really annoying.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

I was very quick at that time, and I accepted the return in two days.

May I ask, what is the current status of assignment editing and submission review?

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

I want to ask how long it will take for a major repair, a minor repair, and a second review. I'm a bit in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | 白吞吞

May I ask if the manuscript is currently under review or in peer review with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

Excuse me, have you encountered the issue of "File will not display in proof" when resubmitting for rework? I have uploaded my document multiple times and keep getting this error message. I also cannot generate a PDF when checking before submission. I am hesitant to submit directly as the due date is approaching. If you have time, could you please provide some guidance?

(0) 讚！ | AAA快乐小狗

The article I wrote, "Correlation between Natural Seepage and Ionic Diffusion in Shales," is my sixth publication in SCI, and it is also the first time I have submitted to a higher-quality journal in Zone 3. The structure of my paper involves conducting data correlation analysis through three different categories of small experiments. Finally, after studying some thin section photos of core samples, I drew a cartoon-style conception of the internal structure of shale, discussed the source of external fluid ions, and wrote a simple mechanistic analysis. My three experiments used the data from the first two experiments for correlation analysis, and the last experiment demonstrated my mechanistic hypothesis. In fact, my first two experiments are very common, and previous researchers have also done data correlation analysis. I simply supplemented the third experiment for verification, refined the process of correlation analysis, and thus arrived at the mechanism of external fluid ion sources, which I illustrated with a cartoon. I share this method of finding highlights in mechanisms through extension experiments with everyone. For more details, you can refer to my paper. 

Regarding the review process, there were a total of five reviewer comments, two from foreigners and three from Chinese reviewers. The foreigners requested a more detailed explanation of the cartoon illustration, while the Chinese reviewers asked for simplification of the background explanation and specific analysis of the fluctuations in several steps and data columns in the experimental data graphs.

(0) 讚！ | 油条

The distribution editor will send an email.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

I submitted on the afternoon of April 9th, and the next day it turned into "Under Review" and there has been no movement since. But I chose OA, and at the time I didn't understand what OA meant (first time submitting to SCI in the first year of graduate school), I don't know if I can change it later...

(0) 讚！ | A.Yyyy

I also submitted on April 8th, and it is still under consideration. Submission received.

(0) 讚！ | bkdbkd

Excuse me, how is it going now? How long until it is submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | bkdbkd

Hello, it has been four days since I submitted my work, and it still shows "submission received". What is the situation? Has an editor taken over my submission?

(0) 讚！ | bkdbkd

3.19 Two reviewers minor revisions
3.27 Resubmission
4.1 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

4.1 Receiving

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

Yes, it is true. The feedback was received on 3.19, but previously it was showing as "Submission Received" in the ACS Publishing Center.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

3.18 submit
3.19 Incorrect numbering of icons, returned for revision --- resubmit

(0) 讚！ | Dannie爱喝绿豆泥

Please send an email inquiry, as it appears that the submission will still show as "Submission Received" rather than "in peer review" as before.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt

I give up, 3.17 is still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | tyytytyt