Me too, you remind me.

(0) 讚！ | hhhhttttt

Western Easter holiday, normal.

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

Submitted to journal since April 15th, it has been over a week and I don't know the current status.

(0) 讚！ | chenchentx

The editor is Professor Paolo Frattini, PhD.

(0) 讚！ | kk5678

May I ask which editor is it?

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

Good brother is very powerful.

(0) 讚！ | River_heang

I have already seen your debut article on the public account.

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

At godlike speed.

(0) 讚！ | 萝卜丝2021

Basking in good luck, I really can't believe how fast this is.

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

2.13 Submitted to Journal
2.16 With editor
2.25 Under review
2.26 The system shows that one reviewer has provided feedback.
3.17 RRC
3.19 Dip
3.23 Major revision! Given one month to revise
4.7 With editor
4.11 Under review
4.11 RRC reviewed on the same day, knew there was a chance
4.13 Dip
4.20 Accept

(1) 讚！ | kk5678

EG has offended many people by rejecting manuscripts left and right, only to turn around and invite others to review them... who will feel comfortable?

(0) 讚！ | 萝卜丝2021

4.16 invited three reviewers, one accepted. At first, only two were invited, but two days later, one more was added. It feels like reviewers are in short supply now.

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

Hurry up.

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

2024.8.12 submitted
2024.8.22 under review
2024.9.4 under review
2024.9.23 under review
2024.12.18 under review
The status has been stuck here, showing that 2 reviewers have received the submission, with one reviewer having completed the review early, while the other has definitely disappeared.

(0) 讚！ | XNwang77

4.11 UR editing speed is really good.

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

The number of submissions in early April has reached over nine hundred. We accept around three hundred articles in a year, you can do the math.

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

Just submitted, not sure about the difficulty of submitting to this journal. Can anyone share their experience?

(0) 讚！ | 泡泡有只猫

Please contact them via live chat in the exclamation mark on the manuscript status interface to ask for assistance in expediting the process.

(0) 讚！ | kkc226

The Word format is fine, the standard format of Elsevier, with line numbers added to the manuscript file and separate from the image tables.

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

Could you please clarify if the manuscript submitted by the original poster was delivered in Word or LaTeX format? I received feedback requesting the addition of line numbers. Could we discuss this further?

(0) 讚！ | fly fish

4.05 with editor. This time it wasn't rejected immediately, hopefully it can go through the review process. Anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

The two papers I submitted for review have both been accepted by the reviewers, but they have not provided any feedback yet. I'm wondering if this is the default setting of the system?

(0) 讚！ | 求本斋

25.03.26 submit
25.03.27 Removed by editor
I have to say the speed is really fast, the reason is the institutional email, the relevance and innovation of engineering geology, and it also improves English. Basically, the entire structure has been changed to enhance the connection with engineering geology.
25.04.02 resubmit

(0) 讚！ | 布布大王

Then these two reviewers should have indeed accepted the review. In my case, one of the reviewers accepted the review and then disappeared without giving any feedback, so I had to invite another reviewer and waited for a long time.

(0) 讚！ | ZWY-

Congratulations, brother. Based on your experience, I would like to ask for advice. On the day my manuscript was sent for external review, the Elsevier manuscript tracking system showed that it was sent to 6 reviewers, but 2 reviewers have already accepted the review. Are these 2 reviewers really accepted the review, or is it just a default display by the system?

(0) 讚！ | kfc52