Thank you very much for the recognition of our manuscript by the journal "Thermal Science and Engineering Progress". The manuscript went through a two and a half month process from submission to acceptance. The editorial handling was very fast, with reviews usually being processed the same day or the next day. The suggestions provided by the reviewers were very helpful in improving the manuscript. The timeline of the manuscript processing is as follows:
- 25-02-13, submitted to journal
- 25-02-14, with editor
- 25-02-15, under review
- 25-02-15, 4-0-0
- 25-02-17, 4-1-0
- 25-02-22, 5-2-0
- 25-03-02, 5-2-1
- 25-03-17, 5-2-2, required reviews complete
- 25-03-17, major revision
- 25-04-14, revision submitted to journal
- 25-04-15, with editor
- 25-04-16, under review
- 25-04-17, 2-2-1
- 25-04-26, 2-2-2, required reviews complete
- 25-04-26, accept

(0) 讚！ | Maple666

Although the first review process took a long time, fortunately the result was good. After looking at the reviewer's comments, no additional experiments were required, just some language revisions and addressing eight or nine theoretical questions. It was relatively easy to respond to them. Keep up the good work with the revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

It has been three months...and the result of the first review has not come back yet. The last reviewer is so slow.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

On March 3, 2025, the editor of 2-1-1 once again urged a reviewer who had not accepted the manuscript for review.

On March 16, 2025, the review for 2-1-1 was completed, but the reviewer never responded, so the editor stopped waiting.

On March 16, 2025, the manuscript was accepted.

It took nearly 50 reviewers to gather two review comments for the entire process, and thanks were given to the editor Bellos.

(0) 讚！ | SCI越多越好

Accepted on March 2, 2025, this paper went through a three-month first review and a four-month second review. I am very grateful for the valuable comments and opportunities provided by the reviewers and editors. There were 40 comments from the first review, and I wrote a reply of 19,000 words. Finally, I obtained the approval of two reviewers. I learned a lot during this process and I am thankful. I also wish all fellow students good luck with the acceptance of their papers!

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

Just like me, it's okay, the editor is just waiting for a third person.

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

Send 9, receive 3, return 2, previously RRC, now back to UR.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

2.26 send 3 pick up 2 return 2 RRC

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

2.17 send 9, pick up 3, return 1.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

2.16 send 3 and return 3 for 1

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

2.15 send 3 get 2 return 1

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

1.07 we
1.18 under review, hoping for a positive outcome.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

1.11 send 2 get 2 back 1

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

After rework, the "with editor" status has lasted for a month. Have you encountered this situation before, buddy?

(3) 讚！ | 革新

I submitted my work on July 10th and still haven't heard back in December. Why is it taking so long?!

(0) 讚！ | xukai996

Under review after 37-1-1, no one is accepting the manuscript for review. What should I do? The status has been stuck there for almost 2 months.

(0) 讚！ | SCI越多越好

May I ask what does it mean when the status changes back to "under review" after the review process for rcc is completed? Does it mean it has been resubmitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 苦哈哈的博士

11:30, send 2 and pick up 2, return 1

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

Still under external review, waiting quietly.

(0) 讚！ | 革新

Are you still in the external audit?

(0) 讚！ | 没没没

I haven't received any information about the job I applied for last month. No one is replying to my messages. Who should I contact if I want to follow up?

(0) 讚！ | oasddjsa

It has been 7 months since the external audit, and there is still no result. Have any of you encountered this situation before? Should I follow up on it?

(0) 讚！ | 革新

11.07 UR sends 2, picks up 1, and returns 1.

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

11.05 UR send 2 pick up 1

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

11.03 UR delivers 2

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj