Okay, thank you. Has it been submitted for review now?

(0) 讚！ | Augu*tumn

Currently it has not been submitted for review, the manuscript number is probably 3050.

(0) 讚！ | 又双叒叕Accept

Hello, I would like to inquire about the announcement on the official website stating that starting from September 1, 2025, an Article Processing Charge (APC) will apply to all articles submitted and accepted after peer review. If an article is submitted before September 1st but accepted after that date, will the APC fee still apply?

(0) 讚！ | Augu*tumn

Hello, I wanted to ask if your submission has been reviewed? How is the progress going? Also, what is the paper number when you submitted it? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Augu*tumn

Looking at everyone's speed being so fast, why is mine so slow?
7.08, submit
7.08, with editor
Still with editor

(0) 讚！ | 又双叒叕Accept

6.18, submit
6.27, under review

(1) 讚！ | 潜水员戴夫

Where can I see the information about the reviewers? Is it the numbers like 6-0-0, 9-0-1?

(0) 讚！ | double双1

2025.06.23 Submitted to Journal, Wishing for a quick and stable review
06.24 With Editor
0624 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | DamonXu

2.18 With Editor
2.19 Under Review
3.07   2-2-1
4.08   4-2-1
5.29   6-2-1
The speed is a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | xyf.

Has it been submitted for review now? Is it so slow? Transferred over, WE on the 17th, four days already, hopefully it can be submitted.

(0) 讚！ | mozhisha0063

Submitted on February 26, 2025
Still at UW on June 11, 2025

(0) 讚！ | monologue

Submitted in December 2024; first review completed on April 2, 2025; major revisions completed on May 1, 2025, for resubmission; accepted on June 3, 2025. This journal is really not fast-paced.

(0) 讚！ | 华氏911

5.19 submit
5.23 we
5.28 UR sends two and receives one (praying for everything to go smoothly)

(0) 讚！ | 逍遥散人

5.9 online

(0) 讚！ | jun0226

In the direction of cooling the photovoltaic panels, the first reviewer cannot find a reviewer. In the previous month and a half, 51 invitations were sent and only 3 were accepted. Then it took another half month for the review committee to not provide any results. What's wrong with the editor, it's maddening.

(2) 讚！ | CC-Coach

Recently accepted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone II, the journal has a very fast processing speed, taking only one and a half months from submission to acceptance.
3.23 submit
3.26 with editor
3.28 under review, 6-0-0
4.12 9-1-1
4.22 9-2-1
4.24 9-2-2
4.24 rrc
4.24 major revision
5.4 r1 submit
5.6 with editor
5.6 under review
5.6 accept

(0) 讚！ | jun0226

Finally got accepted, the first paper in my new research field
2025.1.7 submitted to journal
2025.3.1 RRC
2025.3.10 Major revise (three reviewers, 30 questions)
2025.4.1 R1 submitted
2025.4.3 WE
2025.4.20 UR
2025.4.28 RRC (one reviewer's comments returned)
2025.5.2 RRC+1 (another reviewer's comments returned)
2025.5.5 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 蓝蓝蓝洛

Thank you very much for the recognition of our manuscript by the journal "Thermal Science and Engineering Progress". The manuscript went through a two and a half month process from submission to acceptance. The editorial handling was very fast, with reviews usually being processed the same day or the next day. The suggestions provided by the reviewers were very helpful in improving the manuscript. The timeline of the manuscript processing is as follows:
- 25-02-13, submitted to journal
- 25-02-14, with editor
- 25-02-15, under review
- 25-02-15, 4-0-0
- 25-02-17, 4-1-0
- 25-02-22, 5-2-0
- 25-03-02, 5-2-1
- 25-03-17, 5-2-2, required reviews complete
- 25-03-17, major revision
- 25-04-14, revision submitted to journal
- 25-04-15, with editor
- 25-04-16, under review
- 25-04-17, 2-2-1
- 25-04-26, 2-2-2, required reviews complete
- 25-04-26, accept

(0) 讚！ | Maple666

Although the first review process took a long time, fortunately the result was good. After looking at the reviewer's comments, no additional experiments were required, just some language revisions and addressing eight or nine theoretical questions. It was relatively easy to respond to them. Keep up the good work with the revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

It has been three months...and the result of the first review has not come back yet. The last reviewer is so slow.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

On March 3, 2025, the editor of 2-1-1 once again urged a reviewer who had not accepted the manuscript for review.

On March 16, 2025, the review for 2-1-1 was completed, but the reviewer never responded, so the editor stopped waiting.

On March 16, 2025, the manuscript was accepted.

It took nearly 50 reviewers to gather two review comments for the entire process, and thanks were given to the editor Bellos.

(0) 讚！ | SCI越多越好

Accepted on March 2, 2025, this paper went through a three-month first review and a four-month second review. I am very grateful for the valuable comments and opportunities provided by the reviewers and editors. There were 40 comments from the first review, and I wrote a reply of 19,000 words. Finally, I obtained the approval of two reviewers. I learned a lot during this process and I am thankful. I also wish all fellow students good luck with the acceptance of their papers!

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

Just like me, it's okay, the editor is just waiting for a third person.

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj

Send 9, receive 3, return 2, previously RRC, now back to UR.

(0) 讚！ | 以津真天

2.26 send 3 pick up 2 return 2 RRC

(0) 讚！ | yuanahsjsj