6 days bro, but according to the official website, the estimated review time is around 13 days.

(0) 讚！ | 橘子的地方

How many days did your brother spend reviewing?

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

3.26UR, now it still doesn't feel very fast ?

(0) 讚！ | 橘子的地方

Yesterday was rejected, saying it did not meet the journal's standards. I'm ready to switch to another journal in the third or fourth tier, as long as I can graduate. It's very difficult to publish papers in our field.

(0) 讚！ | luwu

Have you been audited, brother?

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

Has the brother submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

Update: Contacted the author support service of Elsevier, the withdrawal of the paper was successful on April 21st.

(0) 讚！ | 万古同归尘

It is indeed not SCI, but ESCI. ESCI is not part of SCI. The full name is Emerging Sources Citation Index, and it is in parallel relationship with Science Citation Index, both of which can be retrieved by WOS. However, it is not SCI or SCIE. Therefore, some schools do not recognize it. So what you said is not correct.

(0) 讚！ | luwu

Alas, it is your duty.

(0) 讚！ | MadaoBu

Please translate the following passage into English: 是sci

(0) 讚！ | 凡大大

Don't listen to those people talking nonsense below. Being classified as Zone 2 by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and showing Q1 on Web of Science, it must be SCI. Please do not mislead others.

(0) 讚！ | 凡大大

Brother, isn't this journal SCI?

(0) 讚！ | 齐方海

Last year, I submitted my application in one day. I suggest you not to apply. I was misled by this district. It seems that our EI is not considered a graduation requirement. I suggest you have a clear understanding before deciding whether to apply or not.

(0) 讚！ | Rex

Brother, how many days have you been in review? I have been in review for 5 days and still am, while the others have been in review for 3 to 4 days.

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

It has been 5 days and it is still with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

Submitted on December 17, 2024
Received revision comments on February 18, 2025, which may be due to the Chinese New Year, feeling a bit slow. Because the direction may be more biased, it was sent to more than twenty reviewers, with 4 accepting and 2 providing feedback, overall the feedback was quite professional.
Revised and resubmitted on March 16, 2025, likely to be re-reviewed by the two reviewers who reviewed it previously.
Only one reviewer replied with feedback on April 16, 2025, and it was accepted directly.
The journal's pre-proof version is now searchable as of April 17, 2025.
Overall, it was quite fast. It was recommended to transfer here and I submitted it because of the high impact factor (mainly for the sake of opening an account). Now it has the reputation of being in the second quartile, hoping it can be included in SCI.

(0) 讚！ | Rex

Exactly the same.

(0) 讚！ | luwu

April 18 with editor.

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

Why is my submission still showing "manuscript submitted" after three days, brother? It hasn't changed to "with editor" yet. Is yours the same? How many days has it been since you submitted yours for review?

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

Sent an email, waiting for a reply.

(0) 讚！ | jiuyao99

I asked Aiswell if the system email from this journal does not reply, with no recipient, I could not find a contact email. In the end, I withdrew with the help of the author, waiting for the results. Another buddy's question, sent in three days, has already found two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 万古同归尘

Is there no with editor for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

The manuscript was just submitted on April 15th.

(0) 讚！ | accept2002

I sent an email to withdraw the submission on the second day of external review, but the editor did not reply. The external review continued, and even the status of the review time on the official website has changed. The editor did not take any action and ignored many emails.

(0) 讚！ | 和光同尘12

Brother, how long have you been waiting for the review? Why does it keep showing "manuscript submitted" for me?

(1) 讚！ | accept2002