The quality is worrying.

(0) 讚！ | chenshiguang

It is estimated to be difficult to be included in SCI.

(0) 讚！ | chenshiguang

This is clearly false advertising on their public account.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

Because this year the Chinese Academy of Sciences also divided ESCI into different zones, but ESCI is just ESCI, it doesn't matter how many zones there are.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

Although it is indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection with an impact factor of 7.9, it is also included in the Chinese Academy of Sciences and is still classified as a second-tier journal. The upgraded version of the journal partition table shows ESCI, which is why.

(0) 讚！ | 航海小选手

9.10 Major revision

(0) 讚！ | 东北大汉001

9.9 DIP

(0) 讚！ | 东北大汉001

What's the point of being in the top tier? The main thing is whether it can be included in SCI. Many schools don't recognize this journal now.

(1) 讚！ | 好好发论文2024

It's almost impossible, now it's not about looking at the promotion area, it's about when can we enter SCIE.

(0) 讚！ | 111111ya

9.6 3 4 9 RRC

(0) 讚！ | 东北大汉001

9.6 is still 1 2 2+, and the second reviewer insisted on not reviewing the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | woshilizikang

Excuse me, do you think there is a chance for this journal to be upgraded to a first-tier journal?

(1) 讚！ | 基尼太美

Does anyone know why, after the major revision, the comments from the reviewers asked me to make revisions again, and the opinions of three reviewers were "See comments and this aspect has already been discussed in the previous revision, please refer to the comments on the author below", but there is nothing afterwards, empty, no comments at all. What does this mean, does anyone know? Can anyone help me with this?

(1) 讚！ | BigmowangQAQ

Translation: Applications of machine learning in the field of engineering

(0) 讚！ | 路北

Brother, which direction are you heading in?

(0) 讚！ | 无人之地

Encountering an editor with no academic judgment ability, I underwent major revisions once and minor revisions twice. After inviting more than 50 reviewers, the last minor revision was just a matter of bolding and underlining certain indicator data in the table. After completing the 10-minute modification and submitting it, they continued to invite reviewers!!! Even my supervisor couldn't help but laugh.

(0) 讚！ | 路北

Isn't it just USD1210? Why do you need 2120USD?

(0) 讚！ | liushiyi

Rejected, one agreed, one refused, directly rejected.

(2) 讚！ | 汉堡包111

This journal is indexed in ESCI and EI, not SCI.

(0) 讚！ | 今日呼叫孙大圣

Made me burst into laughter.

(0) 讚！ | chenjie321

Why can't I find it on Web of Science?

(0) 讚！ | chenjie321

Does the school recognize this journal? Can they issue a retrieval certificate?

(0) 讚！ | chenjie321

Submitted on May 5th, received major revisions feedback on June 30th, received second round of minor revisions feedback on July 15th, accepted on July 30th, and underwent final editing.

(0) 讚！ | longhun

The review process is acceptable, but some reviewers seem to not carefully read the paper.

(0) 讚！ | Provi

Submitted for approval again. It has been submitted for approval three times.

(0) 讚！ | 路北