We are in the state of not being submitted for review, still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | accept

Could you please confirm if it has been submitted for review? I submitted it on the 6th of July and it is still in the waiting for editor status. I am not sure if it has been sent for review yet.

(0) 讚！ | yiqiuyuan

Record: Table rejected on July 18th, Review: Research conclusion is mediocre with no innovation.

(0) 讚！ | accept

Bask in the joy

(0) 讚！ | accept

Nursing, submitted on June 29th, is still in the WE status on July 13th. How long does this phase typically last?

(0) 讚！ | accept

How's it going? I also submitted, but it hasn't been reviewed yet.

(0) 讚！ | hhhh

Hello, I also submitted to this journal, but they only invited one reviewer. What's going on? How long will it take for the journal to invite another round of reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 咕咕咕

It's still relatively fast, submitted on July 22nd, accepted on September 8th, with "under review" in between.

(0) 讚！ | chenyingtong

How long does it take to receive feedback after a minor repair?

(0) 讚！ | 觅枫小公主

Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 觅枫小公主

Why has it been one month with my editor? I don't dare to rush

(0) 讚！ | 觅枫小公主

Very efficient within one week online

(0) 讚！ | 小新真吖

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 75.0
Emphasized research direction: Nutrition
Nursing experience sharing: 5.26 submission, 5.29 with editor, 6.4 under review, 7.22 major revision, 8.16 revised submission, 8.17 with editor, 9.8 accepted. Reviewers are very friendly, raised detailed questions, requiring language polishing, overall feeling is okay. Medium speed

(0) 讚！ | 小新真吖

Research focus: Cancer; Nursing experience sharing: This journal does not exclude cross-sectional studies

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇恬美

You can select the needs of ESTEE LAUDER, it is very good, more than 2,000 RMB

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇恬美

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0
Research focus: Cancer
Nursing experience sharing: 22nd November 2022 Submit
23rd November 2022 Under review
23rd January 2023 Major revision
1st February 2023 Revision submitted
10th March 2023 Accepted
The whole process took a little over three months and went smoothly. Language polishing is needed, and page charges are optional. I choose not to pay for open access

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇恬美

Hello, may I ask how long does it take with the editor? Approximately how long does it take under review?

(0) 讚！ | 为贪玩还债

Research Focus: Cancer Experience Sharing: Submitted on November 22, 2022, Major Revision due on January 22, 2023

(0) 讚！ | 金蛇恬美

Is this magazine free?

(0) 讚！ | 削月芮欢

Brother, is it normal for this magazine to still be in the initial review after nearly a month?

(0) 讚！ | 北风幻雪

What type of article did you submit?

(0) 讚！ | 中原春柳

The overall speed is quite fast. Two reviewers gave their opinions. After making the modifications, it was accepted in less than two months. Within 11 days of acceptance, there was already an online version. The overall feeling is quite good.

(2) 讚！ | 阿糖

Highlight the innovation of your research, showing distinctive features different from others. The difference in size is another issue, but the important thing is to have a difference. As long as there is a difference, it is innovation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Given the diversity and complexity of biology, it is perfectly acceptable for different outcomes to emerge and be published because scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, and improving on previous knowledge, or even overturning it. When writing a paper, two main strategies should be emphasized: accurately describing materials and methods, especially any discrepancies from others, in detail; in the discussion section, do not avoid contradictions, compare similarities and differences with previous researchers, and attempt to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to highlight the innovation of an article in a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 破戒阳平