Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 朝如青丝暮成雪丶

The second review on November 27th was changed back to "Reviewer Assigned" and lasted for many days. On December 7th, it directly changed to "Reviews Completed" (without the "Under review" status in between). The whole process lasted for 4 months, with a high efficiency. There were 4 experts in the first review, with a total of 40-50 review comments. Receiving major revisions made me both happy and anxious, and I didn't take any action for a whole week because there were too many comments to know where to start. The issues raised by reviewers 1 and 2 were relatively difficult to address, reviewer 3's comments were more specific, focusing on many detailed issues (such as spelling errors and additional references), and reviewer 4's comments were more positive. I wrote a reply of 13,000 words, over 30 pages, addressing the reviewers' comments. I couldn't address several issues raised by reviewer 2, so I had to acknowledge the limitations and integrate them with the limitations in the original manuscript. During the second review, I was nervous every day, but unexpectedly, the manuscript was accepted after major revisions. Good luck to everyone!

(0) 讚！ | 穿靴子的猫

Submitted in early August, accepted directly after major revision.
2025.08.02 New submission
8.25 Editor Assigned
8.26 Reviewer Assigned
8.28 Under review
8.31 Reviewer Assigned
9.2 Under review
9.10 Reviews Completed
9.16 Major Revision
The editor requested a major revision with a deadline of October 31. An extension of 0.5 months was requested 10 days in advance, and the editor agreed and extended the deadline to November 30.
Revision submitted on November 10
11.20 Editor Assigned
11.23 Under review
11.27 Reviewer Assigned
12.07 Reviews Completed
12.11 Accept
12.15 Final Decision Accept.

(0) 讚！ | 穿靴子的猫

Finally made it to the major renovation, please please reply and let me know everything is going smoothly! Accept accept accept!!!

(0) 讚！ | Ann19981011

Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | Ann19981011

Wish the original poster good luck!!!

(0) 讚！ | Ann19981011

The submission was rejected after three days because it did not meet the criteria.

(0) 讚！ | wu0159

Submitted on August 23, 2024, assigned to editors on September 14, and reviewers on September 15. There were three reviewers, and the initial review was completed in early October, but the paper was rejected on October 15. It was my first time submitting a paper, and it was rejected after almost two months. Reviewer 1 seemed biased and raised questions that made me feel like he hadn't even read my article properly, claiming I hadn't addressed certain points that I had clearly written about. I think it may have been because my corresponding author wasn't influential enough. The other two reviewers were more reasonable and provided valuable feedback. The editor eventually rejected my paper, which was fine as it didn't prolong the process. My paper wasn't checked for plagiarism (due to a miscommunication with the editing company, I mistakenly thought there was only one round of editing before submission). I'm not sure if this also had an impact. Overall, the review process was relatively fast, and the reviewers' feedback was decent - it was probably just my own shortcomings. I am now doubting myself and looking for another journal to submit to while making revisions. Also, a reminder to everyone: although the official website allows JPG image formats, it's best to use TIFF for easier readability by reviewers. Avoid listing too many authors, as second authors and beyond often hold little significance. There's no need to include junior colleagues, as it may give the impression of an unprofessional team consisting mostly of students.

(0) 讚！ | 唉痛苦

Sorry, but the text "接接接" does not have a clear meaning in Chinese. Can you provide more context or clarify the text so I can help you with the translation?

(0) 讚！ | 俊瑶小公主

From external audit to results in just two days?

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

Same question

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

This magazine is very normal.

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

And then what happened?

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

It's quite fast to complete the review in just four days.

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

Two months is too much of an exaggeration~

(0) 讚！ | 极乐子骞

Hello soft-hearted editor, hello soft-hearted reviewer, accept it!

(0) 讚！ | 截手逸思

Accept

(0) 讚！ | 截手逸思

Not necessary.

(0) 讚！ | 戈登梅斯菲尔德

Same question, how long does it take for the editor to start processing?

(0) 讚！ | 截手逸思

Connect, connect, connect.

(0) 讚！ | 截手逸思

Receive good luck, receive accept.

(0) 讚！ | 英勋小仙女

Embrace good luck, embrace reception.

(0) 讚！ | 英勋小仙女

Pick up good luck, pick up minor revisions, pick up soft-hearted reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | Dennis Sheridan

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission success rate: 50.0 Focus research direction: Image experience sharing: reviews completed After one week, it becomes under review again. What's the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 之桃大叔

Good luck

(0) 讚！ | 玄虚水秋