Is there any progress?

(0) 讚！ | hhxxv

Could you please let me know if this journal does not send emails after submission? Also, how fast is the process?

(0) 讚！ | 枫眠

Hello, may I ask if this journal does not send emails after submission?

(0) 讚！ | 枫眠

Three weeks after submitting the manuscript, I received feedback. Due to multiple revisions on Energy and TEGR in the past, the reviewers' comments were not very sharp. However, the editorial team provided sharp feedback after the revisions, mainly focusing on the logic, language, figures, and formatting of the article. After intensive and multiple rounds of careful revisions with the chief editor and the coordinating editor, the article was accepted after two months.

The editorial team has very high standards for the quality of articles. It must be said that after the repeated polishing by the editorial team, the quality has improved significantly. Now, I require all students in the team to write academic papers according to the standards of AGER.

It is fair to say that the editorial team of AGER is efficient and professional, and I look forward to entering the SCIE list soon.

(0) 讚！ | 测井之星

Submission for a week, the status has been Awaiting assignment.

(0) 讚！ | 鹤鸣九天

Not SCI, don't be deceived.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Hello, is this SCI? Can it be used for graduation? I see it says ESCI on top.

(0) 讚！ | n210

The feeling of this region cannot be explained by conventional means. It is suggested to directly apply for recognition as a world intangible cultural heritage, so that foreigners can also have a better understanding and learn from it.

(1) 讚！ | 执恋星君

"The comment about your relationship with the editor is spot on."

(0) 讚！ | Thrill

I dare not agree with the level of journals and the quality of papers, sincerely not as good as the top three areas. When a certain unit is divided into areas, maybe they didn't pay attention to the articles in the journals. Do we need to use connections? Should we boost the impact factor or not?

(0) 讚！ | Thrill

Circle culture, the quality of papers is not as good as those in top-tier journals.

(0) 讚！ | Thrill

This is their exclusive journal for their circle, of course, others are not allowed to interfere. Their young editorial board members are all recruited internally and not open to outsiders. This journal may be influential in the short term, but it will not be recognized internationally. However, they are not aiming to make a name for themselves internationally, they just want a piece of the domestic cake.

(1) 讚！ | abaflu1

Feeling very rubbish, submitted an article to Fuel which was already in minor revisions, then resubmitted to this journal AGER, only to be told by someone that it was not suitable for their journal without mentioning any issues with the content of the article, even though their journal already has articles on this topic. Moreover, the published papers are very average with no significant innovations, and many of them are short, yet they are still accepted. I feel like even the quality of a decent tier 3 journal is not up to par. It seems like a game played by the big shots, I won't comment without evidence, but at least I feel it's not legitimate. Even xxxx's articles can get accepted, I don't know what's going on, I will never submit to this journal again. I don't know how they manage to reach tier 1, with such a high impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | Thrill

Excuse me, is this journal not indexed in SCI, and can it not be retrieved in SCI? Will it be useful for graduation then?

(0) 讚！ | 吃不胖的小安

The revised submission has been accepted for publication. The journal has a very high efficiency, and the editors and reviewers are also very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 微恒

Why are there a large number of references to articles from this journal in the one I wrote, even though I have not actually cited them?

(0) 讚！ | NUNY

$990 US dollars plus tax

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Completely agree!

(0) 讚！ | COKE

"Your relationship with the editor is very appropriate, this critique is spot on."

(1) 讚！ | A passenger

A master at IF! Whether it is authoritative or not depends on whether international peers recognize it, IF is not important!

(0) 讚！ | A passenger

Has the quality of the paper you read with that one eye improved? The proportion of domestic experts has increased, hasn't it?

(0) 讚！ | abaflu1

Even if it's not indexed in SCI, how did it go from being in the fourth quartile last year to the first quartile this year? Are we just fooling ourselves? How many respected experts in the field actually recognize journals that manipulate data? How many foreigners (excluding Iranians and Saudis) are involved? It's mostly Chinese so-called experts and their followers publishing in it, and it's clearly a tool for editors and editorial board members to network. I suggest that an international retraction organization thoroughly investigate this journal.

(1) 讚！ | abaflu1

Since November 1st, 2023, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge of $990 US dollars plus tax per processed paper for production costs and Open Access fees, which applies to all accepted articles (excluding editorials) after peer review; Rejected articles are exempt from this charge.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Unlike ESCI, SCIE refers to the latter.

(0) 讚！ | COKE

Since November 1st, 2023, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge of $990 US dollars plus tax per processed paper for production costs and Open Access fees. This fee is applicable to all accepted articles (excluding editorials) after peer review. Rejected articles are not subject to any charges.

(0) 讚！ | COKE