Submission process: Submitted on June 19th, the manuscript passed the technical review on the same day. Requested to make changes to the format on June 22nd, mainly involving ethical content and WB's raw data. Asked to resubmit the untrimmed WB bands on July 4th (Note: The research group had to resubmit three times before it was finally accepted because all bands were trimmed), and it has been in the "with editor" stage since then. On August 19th, it showed that the manuscript was in the peer review stage, and the overall efficiency was quite fast. The reason for the delay of two months before submission was mainly due to the bands not being fully trimmed, which delayed the data processing. Therefore, it is recommended for everyone to prepare the raw, untrimmed bands in advance, and the results will continue to be updated in the future...

(1) 讚！ | 相见库里

I am also someone who didn't reply and didn't dare to push, but eventually received it.

(0) 讚！ | 统子

Two months for review, two months for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 统子

May I ask if your status is "with editor"?

(0) 讚！ | 祝先生

I may be lucky. It took 76 days from submission to acceptance, during which I had to make revisions due to some issues and submitted them right before the deadline (about two weeks later).

(0) 讚！ | 总之就是非常阔耐

I am in the same situation, it has been two weeks already. May I ask how you are doing now? How long did it take for your condition to start improving?

(0) 讚！ | lmy

After waiting for half a year, they directly said they couldn't find a reviewer and had to withdraw the submission. I am truly speechless.

(0) 讚！ | passenger+

The review process is extremely slow, and it is necessary to provide the full uncut film.

(0) 讚！ | 小旭vip

Translation: Need

(0) 讚！ | HH2025

请问你能帮我查一下这个单词的意思吗？

(0) 讚！ | 周彤

I would like to ask if your editorial suggestions are accepted immediately after being returned by the reviewer. My review comments have been returned but are still in the peer review stage. Have you encountered this situation before? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 李铁人儿

Every step is very slow, many rounds of review, it takes a long time to give feedback after each reviewer's comments come back. The last time, only one reviewer replied after a week and did not give feedback. I urged them, but was rejected instantly, and it was without any reason, and they didn't even reply to emails afterwards. After checking, all the editors are Indians, so it's better to be cautious about submitting to this kind of journal. After more than half a year of revisions, it all went down the drain.

(0) 讚！ | wwgggg

Does WB need full coverage film?

(0) 讚！ | haihuangboston

Articles are currently taking between 2-6 months to be accepted, with technical reviews typically taking around 10 days. If you are in a hurry, please proceed with caution.

(0) 讚！ | hasuhasu

I also saw in the system that the reviewers were invited on the same day, and received the reports from the reviewers in just one day, but I don't know the results. What happened next?

(0) 讚！ | passenger+

May I ask if there have been any updates? My manuscript has been in "with editor" status for 11 days, and it was just sent for peer review today. Could you please tell me how many reviewers are typically assigned to a manuscript? And how long does the review process usually take?

(0) 讚！ | HH2025

My situation is similar to yours. One reviewer accepted it directly, while another requested major revisions. After completing the revisions, the editor invited the reviewer again. I saw the reviewer's comments in September, but there has been no result so far. I am also hesitant to follow up.

(0) 讚！ | daria

Submission received
09 Sep 2024
Technical check
Submission is under technical check
09 Sep 2024
Amendment requested
16 Sep 2024
Amendment received
16 Sep 2024
Submission passed technical check
17 Sep 2024
Editorial assignment
Submission status Date
Ready for editorial assignment
17 Sep 2024
With editor
Editor assigned
19 Sep 2024
Peer review
Submission status Date
First reviewer(s) invited
26 Sep 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted
20 Oct 2024
Reviewer report(s) received
27 Oct 2024

Close to two months, hoping for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | wfegfg

Minor revisions accepted, reviewers' comments are constructive, and the efficiency is acceptable.

(0) 讚！ | wbwbwbwb

After one month of technical review and acceptance by two reviewers, with one set of comments already received, the submission was still withdrawn by the assistant editor due to the extended timeframe. What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | TangMY

In May, I submitted a review article, which was sent for review by the editor one month later. After one review, we received comments from four reviewers (one reviewer dropped out halfway, taking a total of 2 months). The article required major revisions and we were given 10 days to make the revisions. After the reviewers returned their comments, the editor accepted the article without further revisions. The entire process took approximately 3 months.

(1) 讚！ | 陈仕

The randomness is too strong.

(0) 讚！ | Ning

You are so lucky. Last September, you submitted an article, and it went through a long initial review and editing process. You had to send reminders in the middle, and it took several days to receive a reply. It took about a month to invite reviewers, and the first wave of invitations did not work out. After another month, the second wave of invitations was sent out, and then the article was left unattended. It wasn't until February of this year when the journal sent a message saying that the article had to be withdrawn because they couldn't find reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | fan@1225

Pretty fast, I didn't expect that the invited reviewers could provide revisions in just one day.

(0) 讚！ | Ning

Family members, who understands? The pace is too slow

(1) 讚！ | qqq132123