Everyone, don't submit to this slow journal, the review process is strict and annoying. It's better to submit to Scientific Reports, a well-established journal with fast publication speed and recommendations. Although the impact factor may be average, doing research is not easy and speed is key.

(0) 讚！ | 善良人

Objective evaluation, the quality of the paper is fairly reliable, but can the efficiency be improved a bit? Can you give me a straightforward answer, don't leave people hanging.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小菜兵

Objective evaluation, the quality of the paper is good, better than many low-quality journals. The journal is acceptable, but the editors are not. They have dragged on for so long, and in the end, only one of the experts gave ambiguous opinions. There should be another chance given, isn't this a waste of everyone's time?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小菜兵

Very slow, editor demands a lot, many expert opinions, everyone please do not invest.

(0) 讚！ | 善良人

Sorry, but I can't provide a translation without the text that needs to be translated. Can you please provide the text for me to translate into English?

(0) 讚！ | 善良人

I'm sorry, but there is no text provided for translation.

(0) 讚！ | 善良人

It has been three months since I submitted the manuscript, but there has been no response. It is still "awaiting reviewer assignment." I emailed them to ask about the situation, but they neither sent it for review nor rejected it. I have no idea what is going on with this journal. Encountering this kind of situation really makes me feel frustrated.

(0) 讚！ | Jing Qiao

I want to say that experts should not stand on a moral high ground to evaluate everyone. If I have your platform, maybe I can also do any experiment. Being a top journal requires strict requirements, but there should also be some warmth. I switched to IEEE transactions, and was directly accepted within a month.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小菜兵

After waiting for 6 months, consulting with 5 experts and receiving a pile of opinions, most of which could be addressed, some experiments using electron microscopy could not be conducted. I explained this to the experts one by one. After waiting for another 6 months, I received two acceptances, one minor revision, and two rejections. In the end, it was rejected, causing me to waste nearly a year's time.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小菜兵

Congratulations, my submission was rejected. I really want to curse, and also, by the way, the requirements of the journal are too high. Aren't they afraid of retaliation?

(0) 讚！ | 科研小菜兵

A few days ago, we were still included in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, but now only the new and cutting-edge journal ranking remains. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | jianzaiyou

EI and SCI have not been indexed, and the fees are still very expensive. I wonder what the point is of getting published in them.

(0) 讚！ | 正义勇士

搞笑泥尿

(0) 讚！ | 正义勇士

Can you take a look? It's difficult to get into the top section of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and many people may never make it in their lifetime.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

Good journal, strict review process. Although the submission was rejected, it is still valuable to receive such professional feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

Not bad, very reliable.

(0) 讚！ | 郝博宇

Why are you arguing with him? Just look at his profile, he only comments on this journal, got rejected once and now he's bragging and talking nonsense, clearly a drag.

(3) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

Doubt your intelligence, if you haven't entered WOS, where did the JCR Zone 1 come from???

(2) 讚！ | superceng

Originally thought you were just a bad actor, didn't expect you to be dumb too, not even able to figure out the Scopus citation score and JCR impact factor before trolling. What does the Chinese Academy of Sciences partition have to do with following WOS? Compared to the existing journal, the Scopus citation score is 12, and the impact factor is estimated to be around 6.

(1) 讚！ | superceng

Are you dragging?

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

The library has a large collection.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

After more than a year of revisions, JCR Zone 1, impact factor 12.6, but later the school wanted to see the Chinese Academy of Sciences zone, which was very depressing. I thought it was Zone 2 of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Although it is not easy to get into Zone 2, falling from Zone 1 to Zone 2 still feels very disheartening. I didn't expect the library feedback that the journal is now in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone 1, still TOP. I jumped up like Fan Jin getting the Jinshi title, thanking God for his favor and not letting my hard work go to waste.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

Reliable, congratulations. I didn't spend money before, I used to use a mix of OA.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

There have been no changes, it has been very stable, and the impact factor has consistently remained above 12.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔

I can easily access cutting-edge academic resources, or simply ask the school library to provide access, as they have access to the database of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

(0) 讚！ | 琳仔