Submitted on June 22, 2024
Returned for revisions on November 7, 2024
Revised and resubmitted on November 26, 2024
With editor on November 27, 2024
Under review on December 18, 2024
I can only say that it's really a waste of time, even eating shit is not as enjoyable.

(0) 讚！ | ccc1113

I am in a similar situation as you, I also submitted my application around mid-August and still haven't received any results. I check every day, but there are often long periods of silence.

(0) 讚！ | mei1111

My RRC has been pending for a month now, and there has been no progress. I submitted it on August 8th, but still haven't received any outcome. It's very frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗的春天

Really slow we twenty days; ur twenty days (normal); rrc more than twenty days and still not decided.

(0) 讚！ | jfun

Hello, may I ask how long did your first review process of rrc last? I have been in the review process for 13 days now, and it has been rrc the whole time. The public account shows that both reviews have been completed.

(0) 讚！ | mei1111

Hello, may I ask how long your RRC has lasted and what were the subsequent results?

(0) 讚！ | mei1111

8.29 接受

(0) 讚！ | BABAXU

How did the article turn out in the end, was it accepted?

(0) 讚！ | sunny1991

Did the OP submit it for review?

(0) 讚！ | caojiabo

Did the original poster submit the article for review later?

(0) 讚！ | Sicons

I have been with editor for 16 days

(0) 讚！ | Alen00

It has been 14 days with no news from the editor, and the date hasn't changed

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Still not submitted for review? It's been so long

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

5.28 submit
5.29 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Just follow the Aiswell official account

(0) 讚！ | 发发发！中中中！

Hello, I want to ask how did you know how many reviewers there were and even who the reviewers were? How did you get this information? I am very curious

(0) 讚！ | Accepted

4.26 submitted to journal
4.27 with editor
5.9 with editor

(0) 讚！ | BABAXU

Good luck, good luck

(1) 讚！ | 科研小小废柴

Generating PDF, please wait for a while

(0) 讚！ | xiaolianguai

Hello, I'd like to ask the teacher how to deal with the flashing of the "build pdf for approval" window?

(0) 讚！ | Sara

I would like to ask why the window flashes when submitting the manuscript, specifically at the "Build PDF for Approval" stage

(0) 讚！ | Sara

Was it sent for reevaluation after rework?

(0) 讚！ | GAO008

Share your submission experience this time, it was quite challenging. Two days after the decision was in process, the editor suggested resubmitting instead of direct rejection. The reason for the suggestion to resubmit was that it did not fit the scope of the journal. This reason certainly didn't convince me and my boss, as how could we submit to your journal if it didn't fit the scope. After my boss sent an appeal letter, the chief editor replied and sent it for review three days later. The long process of review then followed.

After 25 days, there was a major revision in the first review, with three reviewers, one rejecting it and two providing positive feedback.
After 10 days of revisions and resubmission, half a month later, the second review still required a major revision. The reviewer who initially rejected it provided specific comments in the second round, while the other two reviewers were not satisfied with some responses and requested further revisions.
Another 10 days for revisions, in the third review another major revision was required, with one reviewer suggesting acceptance and the other two raising additional questions.
After another 10 days of revisions, the fourth review finally accepted the submission. Not sure if the editor was worn out or if the reviewers had a change of heart, but it was really exhausting.

The review process completely depends on the speed of the reviewers. The editors of the journal were very efficient, as in each round of revisions, once feedback was received, they made a decision on the same day. Truly impressive speed

(0) 讚！ | 科研顺利-accept

The first review process is relatively fast, but it becomes very slow after major revisions are made. One of the original reviewers quickly completes the review, while the other one does not accept the manuscript and the editor does not push for progress. The status remains "under review" indefinitely. Is the second review process also going to be this slow now?

(0) 讚！ | gxddd19

The journal has a very fast processing speed, submitted on February 13, 2024, under review on February 15, and required reviews completed as of March 10

(0) 讚！ | 哆咪妈妈