What was the result later? Was it submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 1235646455652

Did your submission pass later?

(0) 讚！ | 1235646455652

May I ask if it has been submitted for review later?

(0) 讚！ | 1235646455652

Submission on 2025.04.01
Rejected without review on 2025.04.23, editor suggested revision and resubmission
Revised and resubmitted on 2025.06.01 (minor revisions, delayed due to other work)
Under review on 2025.06.18
RRC 2 on 2025.06.26
RRC 3 on 2025.06.28
Revision requested on 2025.07.01, reviewed by 4 reviewers
Revision sent back on 2025.08.10
Accepted on 2025.08.13

(0) 讚！ | bigrubby

Thank you, friend!!

(0) 讚！ | 田如梦

I am relatively fast in the first review, around two weeks. When I submit to WB, I always do grayscale analysis and create a histogram, so there are no issues raised.

(0) 讚！ | Cenyongjie

Could you please tell me how long it takes for a friend to review it? Is a quantitative value needed for WB? Thank you for your answer!

(0) 讚！ | 田如梦

The journal is a good one. It took less than 40 days from submission to acceptance, including the first round of minor revisions and additional experiments which took 14 days. After the first round of revisions, I was notified of acceptance the next day, which is really efficient. However, this journal moved from the medical first quartile to the biological second quartile. I hope it will be promoted to the first quartile, otherwise submitting to this journal will not be worth it.

(0) 讚！ | Cenyongjie

Submission on May 21, 2025. Assigned to editor 12 days later. Received feedback in less than a month for revisions. Made minor revisions and added a small experiment within 15 days. Revised feedback received on July 12, 2025. Sent for external review on July 21, 2025. Accepted on July 26, 2025. Following the speed specified by the journal.

(0) 讚！ | lxn-FF

Do you need to submit the original data for WB?

(0) 讚！ | mrazkickkkk

Do you need to submit the original data? For example, from WB.

(0) 讚！ | mrazkickkkk

A very good journal, with swift and efficient review process. Both the first and second reviews were done promptly.

(0) 讚！ | 无边

Bioinformatics analysis and some experiments were submitted for 14 days and rejected, possibly due to the extensive content, with the reason being that it did not align with the theme of the journal.

(0) 讚！ | duo啦a梦

Finally, all original data is needed, including WB whole membrane, qPCR, flow cytometry facs, confocal imaging Meta Data.

(0) 讚！ | 科研型搬砖党

I guess it's still biology major.

(0) 讚！ | 冷漠残血

Do you know about the internal news of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2025? Is there a chance for Free to return to the medical zone 1? I feel that if it is still in the biology zone, it is better to stay in zone 2.

(1) 讚！ | TBBh

Most of them probably do not need the original data, as specific requirements may vary for different articles.

(1) 讚！ | Cenyongjie

Submitted in mid-October, sent to editor for review 2 days later, received feedback from 3 reviewers at the end of October with about 20-30 suggestions for revisions within 10 days, invited another reviewer for a second review but they never accepted, and then was accepted for publication in early December.

(0) 讚！ | 橙橙橙

Hello, "under review" means it hasn't reached external review yet, it's still in the hands of the editors, correct? So, when a submission is rejected, is it also based on the editor's opinion?

(0) 讚！ | hansally

Hello, is his "under review" status for external review? Some journals have internal review, I'm a bit worried... What will be the next steps for you?

(0) 讚！ | hansally

Hello, I would like to ask, is this "under review" for external review rather than internal review of the journal? I have been under review for 2 days and I'm not sure if it is for internal review.

(0) 讚！ | hansally

I want to ask whether "under review" means it is still being internally edited or has already been sent for review. I also went under review just 2 days after submitting my article, so I am worried that there is a risk of rejection in the internal review process. If it has already been sent for external review, this seems unusually fast.

(0) 讚！ | hansally

It has been ten days since submission, and it is still with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | gx

Does it mean there is no hope to submit for review if it has been with the editor for more than 14 days?

(0) 讚！ | liruili

How is your paper going, classmate? Has it been submitted for review? Mine has been in review for half a month already and is still with the editor. It's so slow.

(0) 讚！ | liruili