期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | Aerospace Science and Technology LetPub Score 8.0
60 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.1 Influence 7.7 Speed 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | AEROSP SCI TECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1270-9638 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 64 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 24.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/aerospace-science-and-technology | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/AESCTE | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier Masson SAS | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | FRANCE | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 904每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 9.48% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1270-9638%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 16.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 16.5 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy 來自Elsevier的數據: 35% | ||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Aerospace Science and Technology] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: wen 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-31 20:18:59 評論於 Brother, how long does it take for Accept to be published on the internet? ![]() ![]() |
作者: wen 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-31 20:16:33 評論於 How long does it take for Accept to be published online? ![]() ![]() |
作者: wen 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-31 20:15:52 評論於 Hello, how long does it typically take for Accept to publish something online? ![]() ![]() |
作者: going 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-24 09:46:36 評論於 The second review for the amendment on June 25th was conducted by only one reviewer and was completed on June 30th. However, it is still under review until now. Do you know what the situation is? ![]() ![]() |
作者: ECHO-12 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-24 09:39:47 評論於 This journal has some articles that are processed quickly, while others are processed slowly. I submitted my article on February 9th, but I have not received the first review yet. I have followed up once during this period, and although I received a response, it seems to have had little effect. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭大大哟 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-23 14:02:52 評論於 I submitted on April 23rd, sent for review on May 24th, invited only five reviewers, and it has remained unchanged until now. ![]() ![]() |
作者: will 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-21 16:01:45 評論於 I submitted my article on March 27th and it was sent for review on April 22nd. Until now, I have not received any news. When I checked the official account, I found that three review invitations had been sent out, but no one responded. I also sent an email to the editor to remind them, but it seems to have no effect. Has anyone else experienced a similar situation, with no news for several months in a row? The process is very slow. How did you handle this situation when it happened to you? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 发个sci毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-16 09:26:03 評論於 The process took quite a long time, but we were fortunate. It took a year from submission to acceptance after three rounds of review, with the first round alone taking nearly ten months. We are grateful to the editors and reviewers, who were very professional and responsible, greatly improving the quality of the paper. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 且罢 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-05 15:57:12 評論於 Sure! It took two and a half months to complete. Here are the time points to share: 4.20 we 4.28 ur 6.10 rrc 6.23 we 7.3 we in the morning, ur in the afternoon, rrc in the evening 7.4 Accept ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-04 16:55:36 評論於 Double-blind. Author information and funding statement should be removed when submitting. ![]() ![]() |
作者: qqwqs 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-01 09:27:16 評論於 Someone said not to delete, but I deleted it anyways. I voted blindly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 张建程 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-01 09:11:59 評論於 Excuse me, is AST now double-blind? Do submissions need to delete author information? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 张建程 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-01 09:11:03 評論於 Excuse me, does the author information need to be deleted when submitting a manuscript? Is there a conclusion yet? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭大大哟 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-29 11:01:25 評論於 I waited for the editor for fifty days, and only five were invited for review. Only one accepted and it has been reviewed. After that, the editor did not respond and did not invite any new ones. Two months have passed, I am speechless. ![]() ![]() |
作者: qqwqs 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-28 09:11:42 評論於 Has the paper on spacecraft gone out of scope as well? Is the editor-in-chief so lazy? ![]() ![]() |
作者: qqwqs 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-27 00:07:51 評論於 Is AST double-blind now? Should author information be removed from submissions? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-24 12:54:12 評論於 The first reviewer's comments are expected to be returned in approximately two weeks. ![]() ![]() |
作者: going 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-24 12:21:22 評論於 Thank you, about how long before you accept it? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-24 09:21:00 評論於 After rework, only one reviewer accepted the review, and the other reviewer did not accept the review for a month. In the end, only the comments of the first reviewer were returned, but since the comments were very good, the editor accepted them directly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: going 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-20 15:56:47 評論於 What does "minor revision and modification" mean? ![]() ![]() |
作者: going 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-20 15:55:45 評論於 After my revision was submitted, only one reviewer has accepted the review, the second one has not reviewed yet. Is this also the case for you? Are you a reviewer who decides on acceptance after reviewing? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-19 10:44:29 評論於 Submission on December 10, 2024 Minor revisions suggested on February 23, 2025 Minor revisions made and submitted to journal on March 4, 2025 Inquired about status on May 13, 2025 Under review with Editor on May 21, 2025 Only one reviewer accepted the minor revision, but the feedback was very positive. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-19 10:42:57 評論於 Accept by June 18, 2025! ![]() ![]() |
作者: rsx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-18 10:32:32 評論於 0612: Under review It should be lucky, the editor-in-chief just happened to be handling the manuscript, and the reviewers also reviewed it relatively quickly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ECHO-12 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-13 23:03:41 評論於 Pneumatic is the same. The one I submitted in early February is still under review now, it has been four months in total. It has been in the hands of the editor for two months. It's all about luck whether it will be processed quickly or slowly. ? ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us