期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | Aerospace Science and Technology LetPub Score 8.0
60 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.1 Influence 7.7 Speed 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | AEROSP SCI TECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1270-9638 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 64 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 24.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/aerospace-science-and-technology | ||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/AESCTE | ||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier Masson SAS | ||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | FRANCE | ||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 652每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 6.37% | ||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1270-9638%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 16.0 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 16.5 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Easy 來自Elsevier的數據: 35% | ||||||||||||||||
在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 4 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[Aerospace Science and Technology] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: ECHO-12 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-13 23:03:41 評論於 Pneumatic is the same. The one I submitted in early February is still under review now, it has been four months in total. It has been in the hands of the editor for two months. It's all about luck whether it will be processed quickly or slowly. ? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 古冰 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-13 11:17:10 評論於 Is the author's submission related to control or aerodynamics? Is the review and editing process so fast? My submission on April 16th is still "With Editor". ![]() ![]() |
作者: 5篇TOP啊 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-13 10:35:17 評論於 What's the situation, boss? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Zerob 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 16:19:19 評論於 Minor revision and modification turned out to be just a set phrase, I really thought it was a small repair... ![]() ![]() |
作者: Zerob 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 16:14:27 評論於 Will new reviewers be added? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Zerob 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 16:12:50 評論於 My situation is the same, with reviewers only giving a simple "yes or no" without providing specific feedback. I don't know how to respond to them either. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Zerob 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 16:11:48 評論於 Is Xiao Xiu so fast? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 海之熙 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 12:15:06 評論於 I submitted my paper in November last year, went through one round of revisions, and it took a total of seven months to be accepted. Overall, the review process took about three months each time, which is average, but the editorial handling time was a bit slow, taking one month each time. I followed up twice, but it didn't have much effect. However, delays are inevitable in this field. Overall, the submission experience was good. Here is the timeline: Submitted 2024 11 19 With Editor 2024 11 30 Under Review 2024 12 8 3-3-1 2024 12 25 3-3-2 2025 01 10 Required Reviews Completed 2025 01 10 Revise 2025 02 06 Resubmitted 2025 03 04 With Editor 2025 03 19 Under Review 2025 3 31 2-2-1 2025 05 16 (44 days) 2-2-2 2025 05 17 (47 days) Required Reviews Completed 2025 05 17 Accepted 2025 06 11 ![]() ![]() |
作者: ECHO-12 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 10:23:03 評論於 Judging from the comments of other users, it seems that only a few are relatively fast, while most are on the slower side. Additionally, other users have mentioned that even if they are urged, it is ineffective. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小褚同学 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-11 15:54:26 評論於 Try sending an email to remind them, your deputy editor may not be very efficient. ![]() ![]() |
作者: rsx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-11 15:36:40 評論於 0502: Submission 0510: Under review 0603: Minor revision 0609: Resubmit 0610: With editor ![]() ![]() |
作者: ECHO-12 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-11 10:20:02 評論於 Why is your manuscript being processed so quickly? Mine has been under review for four months already. Is there any way to expedite the review process? ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept_more 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-10 21:01:52 評論於 2025.06.08 Submit 2025.06.09 Under Review ![]() ![]() |
作者: qqaccept 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-09 18:29:24 評論於 Bro, it's been 20 days and no one has accepted yet, will the follow-up editor handle this? How long is the first review cycle of this journal? I have been waiting for a day, the editor has also invited several waves of reviewers but no one has accepted. ![]() ![]() |
作者: NWPULX 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-07 19:51:00 評論於 The decision letter for this journal feels very strange. In the first round of review, we received opinions from five reviewers. The opinions consisted of nine questions, to which the reviewers answered yes or no. The second part of the opinions provided specific additional comments. Reviewer 1 gave four comments when answering the nine questions, while Reviewer 5 only gave one comment in response to the nine questions and did not provide any additional comments. I suspect that the editor may have missed sending out some of the reviewers' comments. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 发个sci毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-05 21:21:51 評論於 This is actually quite common. It can be difficult to find reviewers, so we just have to be patient and wait. ![]() ![]() |
作者: qqaccept 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-04 16:36:24 評論於 The manuscript has been under review for 15 days without any acceptance. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 机智的宝儿姐 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-04 08:39:18 評論於 Why am I still single after almost three months? It's really tragic. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 接accept!! 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-02 09:51:50 評論於 The efficiency of the deputy editor is quite high, constantly searching for reviewers. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 七星光芒剑 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 10.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-30 21:27:48 評論於 The submission was rejected within a few hours with the reason being: "The research results reported are too premature for publication. More work is needed to substantiate the conclusions in your manuscript." ![]() ![]() |
作者: Taco 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-28 09:27:09 評論於 Under Review on 2025-05-27. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ZeroFive 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-26 22:04:34 評論於 Senior brother, what's your current status? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 发个sci毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-26 21:32:13 評論於 X will be processed the next day after the deadline. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ZeroFive 領域: 物理与天体物理 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-26 20:59:25 評論於 Is it the same for senior brother? I made minor edits, but major revisions were needed. How is senior brother doing now? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 发个sci毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-26 10:31:28 評論於 The minor repairs of AST often require the workload of major repairs, and they will need to be re-inspected after the rework. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us