Provide a sample, found five reviewers, and received initial reviews in early four months.
Four minor revisions and one rejection (Reviewer Three), the editor gave the rejection.
The reviewer who rejected it was like a mad dog, with no constructive comments, saying nothing was good from start to finish. It was as if the existence of this article was a mistake, talking about endless irrelevant content, asking to add seven or eight topics for discussion and experiments. Is this Nature Geoscience? With all that added, this paper would be thirty to fifty thousand words long.
Subsequent consideration of this journal is no longer being pursued.

(0) 讚！ | 金饼饼

I invested 10 months, and you invested 1 month? No, didn't we save the Milky Way galaxy in our previous life?

(0) 讚！ | Hanson Li

No progress yet, keep waiting!

(0) 讚！ | cosmosspirit

Could you please let me know if there is any news about your article? I have been waiting for 50 days and it is still in the "waiting for editor" status. I am not sure how much longer it will take. Can it be sent for review soon?

(0) 讚！ | jiangqo

It's been a month with the editor, who knows what's going on?

(1) 讚！ | cosmosspirit

It has been a month since I submitted the manuscript to the editor.

(0) 讚！ | cosmosspirit

It's been over 20 days in the hands of the editor and there has been no progress, isn't it sad...

(0) 讚！ | DouHua

The review comments from the submission in May 2024 were received at the end of August. The first round of reviews had comments from 2 reviewers, which were relatively easy to respond to. The revised manuscript was sent back at the end of September. In November, the second round of reviews from 3 reviewers provided numerous comments, totaling 20,000 words just for addressing the questions. Surprisingly, there was a third round of reviews with another 20,000 words. It was exhausting, and even the teacher felt helpless. The revised manuscript was sent back in mid-February, and I had almost given up hope. Luckily, it was finally accepted in early March after a 10-month long process.

(0) 讚！ | 飘飘

Submitted on July 10, 2024;
Revised on October 6, 2024, with input from 3 reviewers, the managing editor, and the editor-in-chief, totaling 5 opinions;
Revised again on November 19, 2024;
Sent for review on November 22, 2024, with 2 reviewers;
One reviewer accepted the review on December 3, 2024, and returned the comments on December 6, 2024;
As of January 27, 2025, the other reviewer's comments are still pending, prompting the editor to invite another reviewer;
As of March 5, 2025, the status remains as "under review";
It is unknown how long the reviewers have been given to review the paper, and it is frustrating as they seem to be too busy to provide timely feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 毛毛虫爱吃的菜

2025.1.6 submitted
2025.1.17 under review, with 3 reviewers
2025.1.24 review completed by 1 reviewer
2025.2.21 review completed by 2 reviewers

(0) 讚！ | li-ethan

After four rounds of revisions, including rejection and resubmission, major revisions, moderate revisions, and minor revisions, the article was finally accepted. The quality of the article has greatly improved.

(0) 讚！ | 吃一大口白日梦

Who knows what is the minimum number of reviewers required by Geoderma, 2 or 3?

(0) 讚！ | 小野泽泽

I have submitted my paper now, but I didn't see the section for recommending reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | James2306

Hello, I recommended three domestic reviewers when submitting the manuscript, but the editor returned it and requested a maximum of two reviewers from the same country. When I tried to resubmit, I couldn't find the "recommended reviewers" section. Have you encountered this situation before?

(0) 讚！ | 大中小猪

The submission was made at the end of August and accepted in mid-December, taking a total of 3 and a half months. The majority of the time was spent on the first round of peer review, which lasted for 2 months.

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Can you please share a template for responding to feedback?

(0) 讚！ | LLL

Could you please share a template for responding to feedback?

(0) 讚！ | LLL

Do you have a template for responding to revision suggestions?

(0) 讚！ | LLL

Based on past experience, it is most likely a rejection, and I feel like giving this editor a hammer on the head.

(0) 讚！ | 要投多少次才行啊

How long does it usually take for review feedback to come back?

(0) 讚！ | 小野泽泽

Catena is good, especially the articles on biogeochemical processes, especially those in the wetland direction, most of which are rejected by GCB.

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

How about Catena?

(0) 讚！ | z_y1

Invited 6 reviewers, 4 reviewers accepted the review, 3 reviewers provided feedback, waited for 20 days, and the editor insisted on waiting for the opinion of the fourth reviewer. I highly recommend against submitting to this journal, it's better to focus on improving your content and submitting to SBB or GCB.

(1) 讚！ | 辣条哥

1. Submission in early September
2. Major revisions by the end of August
3. Revisions due in early September
4. Acceptance by mid-October
To be honest, this journal progresses slowly, so I do not recommend it for students in a hurry.

(0) 讚！ | Linda

Submit in mid-April
Review in early May
Complete the revised manuscript in mid-June
Return in early July
Submit again at the end of July
Minor revisions in early September
Please be patient and wait.

(0) 讚！ | 一天一个小目标