Is it handled by Academician Piao? I have also been waiting for more than a month.

(0) 讚！ | 旺仔君

6.20 has been reviewed, but there is still no feedback. It's too slow.

(0) 讚！ | HHHHt

5.01 submitted
5.05 under review
The second reviewer has been reviewing for over two months now, it's too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 同学123

Please wait patiently, I had to wait for a month after I finished reviewing before the editor sent me their feedback.

(0) 讚！ | CH_2001

20 days have passed, and 0 people have accepted the review. How long do we generally have to wait?

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

One month for initial review is too long. It's fine if it takes a month for review, but rejecting after a month is too time-consuming...

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

The timeline of this journal and its official website is seriously out of sync. Submitted on April 26th, external review on June 6th, still no response by June 24th. It is normal for the initial review to take over a month.

(0) 讚！ | EasternKing

The situation remains unchanged.

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

You've been working for such a long time, you should submit it for review. The research content and the journal don't match very well, and they didn't give a specific reason for rejection.

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

I have submitted my manuscript to JH for 15 days now, and the editorial decision was made quite quickly on your end. May I ask what was the reason for rejection from JH, was it due to lack of innovation or out of scope of research?

(0) 讚！ | 活在卷和关系的时代

Is there any progress now? My wither editor has been idle for ten days with no changes.

(1) 讚！ | cc_fei

Has there been any progress with your with editor? How long until the next step?

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

6.9 Submitted, with the editor for 10 days. Is this speed normal?

(0) 讚！ | cc_fei

It has been one month with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | webgis

It has been a month since contacting the editor, but still no response despite reminders.

(0) 讚！ | webgis

My editor chose Academician Park, I guess the editor has not been handling it all along, there has been no movement for so long, but I dare not rush, it is still "With Editor" until May 14th.

(0) 讚！ | EasternKing

Have there been any recent developments for me in the same time and same state?

(0) 讚！ | HHHHt

The website has been online since February of this year (2025), but it has not been indexed by Web of Science yet. I wonder how long it usually takes for articles to be indexed after publication.

(0) 讚！ | 地幔流体

I am also 4.26 with editor at the moment. I am still in this status and looking forward to submission. If there are any changes in status, we can discuss it.

(0) 讚！ | sure

4.26 WE 
5.06 WE may be the May Day holiday, looking forward to review.

(0) 讚！ | EasternKing

The editing requirements are still very high, with a total of 6 months spent on major revisions and minor corrections.

(0) 讚！ | 仓

The speed is quite fast, edited by Academician Park, invited 2 reviewers, 2 accepted the review, and the review was completed in one month. The opinions all indicate that it is interesting but there are some problems, and they were rejected. The reviewers are too professional, from the current manuscripts, half of them cannot be modified (unless a new article is rewritten as required). The problems are all about method selection, data accuracy, geographical division, etc., and they are very detailed. Ah, it's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | Hhmper

The review process of GPC is very strict, and the quality of papers has been significantly improved. Thanks to the editor-in-chief and reviewers of GPC! The time from initial submission to acceptance is five months, which is acceptable in terms of speed.

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸡啊啊啊啊

The review process of Global and Planetary Change is very strict. My work was sent to two experts for review. The first round of review indicated that there should be two major revisions, and the editor ultimately requested major revisions. However, the feedback in the email initially seemed to suggest rejection, indicating their high standards. After making revisions for 2 and a half months, the revised manuscript was returned to the system. One month later, I received the feedback from the second round of review. Reviewer #1 asked for modifications to a few words and sentences, while Reviewer #2 did not provide any new comments. The editor ultimately requested minor revisions, using cautious language such as "Your paper should become acceptable for publication pending a suitable minor revision and modification"

(4) 讚！ | 捯饬地球的小Z

It feels like an unpleasant submission. The review process took over two months, which is acceptable. One reviewer suggested minor revisions, while the other seemed to recommend major revisions based on the comments. However, there were no fatal issues identified. The paper was ultimately rejected by the editor. A frustrating submission experience

(0) 讚！ | kyxb