The editor gave a major revision.

(0) 讚！ | forlinger

It has been almost a month, is everything still checking out okay?

(0) 讚！ | 可口可乐1331

Oh, this is clearly an editorial issue. Not a single reviewer rejected it, yet the editor did. It could have been spared from review, wasting the resources of reviewers and the time of the contributors.

(0) 讚！ | Eldon_kh

The status of my application submitted on February 13th is still the same until now.

(0) 讚！ | 小白龙

I have been in this state for over a week now, how about you, OP?

(0) 讚！ | Tembin

It has been a week, is everything normal?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

May I ask about the outcome?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

May I ask how long does it usually take for the status of "Undergoing initial checking"?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

You are most likely being sent for review in your current state.

(0) 讚！ | SJNing

Three days after submission, "Under Review" means it has been sent for review or the editor is evaluating it?

(0) 讚！ | forlinger

The submission process has been bumpy, here is a record:
August 2, 2024: Submitted
September 26, 2024: Revised and resubmitted, with two reviewers requiring additional validation results and some text reorganization
November 20, 2024: Resubmitted, currently under review

I have previously submitted to GCB with a trial mindset, but the results were not very good. This manuscript was submitted to several sub-journals before, but ended without any progress. The journey with GCB has also been difficult, hoping for a smooth process for the manuscript in the future.
PS: GCB is still considered a "white moonlight" in my heart, being able to have one accepted can bring joy for a long time.

(0) 讚！ | 梦想成为更好的自己

Top journals in the field of environmental ecology, such as GCB and Ecology Letters, are focused on regional and global scale issues, emphasizing innovation and quality of work. The editors and reviewers are highly professional and provide constructive feedback. While there may be rejections and resubmissions, the handling of manuscripts is faster compared to other journals. Submitted on May 17, rejected and resubmitted on June 1, revised on August 13, major revisions on September 23, revised again on November 5, and finally accepted on November 7. The journal has a high reputation, and I hope to publish another article there in the future.

(0) 讚！ | sunny-

It needs to have global significance, be connected to major issues, have a large scale, but not be nitpicky about details, and be less rigorous than association journals.

(1) 讚！ | 林宇艾

The flagship journal in the global change field should be the top tier among both the main journal and its sub-journals, with many articles coming from the sub-journals. I was fortunate to have an article accepted, and the process was very fast. The first review took a month and a half for major revisions, and the second review took three weeks before acceptance. It took just over two months from submission to acceptance.

In my personal opinion, GCB places a strong emphasis on the novelty and interest of research. The research should have global significance, and they are not very picky about details. 

The best part is the speed - I have noticed that articles published online on their website are usually accepted within six months from submission, which is much better than journals like AFM. 

Overall, it is a very authoritative, high-level, and fast-paced journal. Articles with strong innovation and significant impact are worth a try.

(2) 讚！ | ysalc

Submit on 2024.7.7
Try it out, not sure how it will turn out.

(0) 讚！ | GUNDAM

Two major revisions and one minor revision were rejected by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | microeco

03-Jan-2024: Submission;
04-Mar-2024_16-Apr-2024: Resubmission;
28-May-2024: Minor revision;
05-June-2024: re-submission;
06-June-2024: Accepted

(3) 讚！ | XAZZ

5.7 Submitted
5.10 Under review
Is it under review or with the editor? Hoping for a positive outcome

(0) 讚！ | microeco

Submitted in November 23, received the result one month later. Got one major revision and one minor revision, then got rejected and asked to resubmit. Made revisions in March and got accepted in April. The editor's decision was one level below the reviewers' recommendations

(2) 讚！ | Dogontheleft

Hello, is there an online proofreading stage at the end?

(0) 讚！ | grammays

Thank you for your help with translating this paragraph

(1) 讚！ | grammays

Could you please let me know the title of the article on the impact of soil erosion on carbon? It is closely related to my research direction, and I would like to learn more about it

(0) 讚！ | 动物园大佬板

Just finished a global soil carbon meta-analysis. Emphasis was placed on the impact of soil erosion on global soil carbon. It took half a year from the initial submission to the rounds of major and minor revisions to acceptance, but the speed was not bad.

It wasn't as difficult as I had imagined. Actually, this article was rejected by AGE, Geoderma before. With a try-it attitude, I submitted it to GCB, and to my surprise, it was sent out for review and even given a chance for revisions.

And finally, it got accepted.

Now, the second GCB article has been submitted as well, hoping for good luck. Hehe, my junior brother always says my articles are probably too strong for AGE and Geoderma to accept. Hehe

(1) 讚！ | 天才少女

I hope to pass one exam soon

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Looking forward to it!

(0) 讚！ | XAZZ