Submitted on March 30
Decision to revise on April 28
Submitted revised file on June 10
Decision for minor revisions on July 1
Submitted revised file on July 21
Received on July 22

The review and acceptance process was fast, and the reviewers were professional. It is important to respond carefully to the reviewers' comments. The reviewers provided many valuable suggestions and made efforts to improve the quality of the article. I learned a lot during the revision process, and the quality of the article significantly improved after the revisions.

When submitting your manuscript, please consider the following points:
- GCB requires highlighting the global significance, novelty of scientific questions, and solid experimental local articles can also be accepted by the journal.
- Pay attention to reviewer recommendations, as the editors will carefully screen the reviewers you recommend.
- There are no specific requirements for the format of the text when submitting, but ensure that the formatting is neat.

(0) 讚！ | 徐悻悻

It may not be the editorial review, but I found an explanation of the submission status from the journal.

(0) 讚！ | IMZ

Review by editor.

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

I want to ask if co-first authorship and co-corresponding authorship are allowed in journals. I couldn't find any requirements on the number of corresponding authors, but in the new submission system, only one corresponding author can be selected. I would like to know what is the limit on the number of corresponding authors for journals.

(0) 讚！ | Lxc中中中

Does anyone understand the new submission system? Just submitted a few hours ago and it has already become "Under review". Does this mean it is under review (shouldn't be so fast) or does it mean something else?

(0) 讚！ | IMZ

There is no news yet, it has been 13 days, still Under Review.

(0) 讚！ | 大江

The new system "Under Review" should be subject to editorial review.

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Friends, did you invest in the new system or the old system?

(0) 讚！ | ywt0729

Dajiang, have you heard any news about your article?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

It will be under review in 20 days. The speed at which each editor processes varies, so your status should be under review.

(0) 讚！ | mammals_611

It is estimated that downstairs is still in the hands of the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

What happened to the original poster? It's not even July 19th yet, how can you predict the future?

(0) 讚！ | 辣条哥

Did you submit the manuscript in the new system?

(0) 讚！ | wzb666

Could you tell me about the status change? My submission turned into "under review" the next day. Does it mean it's under review or in the hands of the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 大江

The day after I submitted my manuscript, the status changed to "under review." Is it in the hands of the editor or has it been sent for peer review? It feels like it was sent for review quite quickly, in less than a day.

(0) 讚！ | 大江

Submitted on March 25th
Reviewed on April 15th
Major revisions on May 19th, 45 days
Revised on July 2nd

(0) 讚！ | mammals_611

Isn't it still not July 19th yet?

(0) 讚！ | ywt0729

Submitted on June 13, 2025; sent for review two days later.
Review comments returned on July 19, with both reviewers providing very positive feedback. Editor requested major revisions, with a two-month deadline for revisions.

(1) 讚！ | 王小军

I heard that if the status lasts for more than 2 weeks, it is usually under review.

(0) 讚！ | SJNing

5.05 Undergoing initial checking
Half a month has passed and it is still undergoing initial checking. 
Do any friends have the same situation? What happened next?

(0) 讚！ | 彦祖

Good publication, hope to be included.

(0) 讚！ | 科研战士

Hello, do you have the results now?

(0) 讚！ | 科研战士

The editor gave a major revision.

(0) 讚！ | forlinger

It has been almost a month, is everything still checking out okay?

(0) 讚！ | 可口可乐1331

Oh, this is clearly an editorial issue. Not a single reviewer rejected it, yet the editor did. It could have been spared from review, wasting the resources of reviewers and the time of the contributors.

(0) 讚！ | Eldon_kh