Is there any movement or news afterwards?

(0) 讚！ | 广东郭富城

Help, how come there is no manuscript number after submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | JoJo

What should I do if a reviewer does not accept the revision after reworking? Please advise.

(0) 讚！ | 广东郭富城

I am still editing it. How long did it take you to edit?

(0) 讚！ | 广东郭富城

I actually went back, and returned on May 14, 2025, with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸡啊啊啊啊

I reviewed it for over 40 days, and the deputy editor also provided some feedback.

(0) 讚！ | qyqyqy

Is he only revising, too? I am also revising. He told me to return within three months in the email, but the system only allows two months. Hahaha.

(0) 讚！ | qyqyqy

2025.04.15 First submission
2025.04.17 Under review
2025.05.02 Revised, two reviewers, one with moderate feedback, one with positive feedback, given one month for revisions
Updates to follow

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸡啊啊啊啊

The handling editor is the most responsible editor I have ever met.

Submitted on September 25, 2023
September 27, 2023 with editor
Under review on September 30, 2023
Comments returned on March 1st, 2024,  one moderate, two major
The first draft returned on April 25, 2024
The review comments returned on May 10, 2024, 
Submitted for the third time on May 20, 2024
May 20th, 2024 there are still some minor errors.
The fourth Submission May 22, 2024
Received on June 18th, 2024

(0) 讚！ | 刘院士

Hello Guo Fucheng from Guangxi, is it necessary to have three reviewers, or is it because the first two reviewers have conflicting opinions that a third reviewer is invited?

(0) 讚！ | cugcq

Hello, candidate for the construction site preparation. I would like to ask if it is necessary to have three reviewers, or is it because the opinions of the first two reviewers are divided that the third reviewer is invited?

(0) 讚！ | cugcq

2023.2.28 Submitted to Journal
2023.3.1 With Editor
2023.3.2 Under Review
2023.4.24 Major Revision (R#1: Moderate revision; R#2: Rejection and resubmit; R#3: Moderate revision)
2023.6.20 Revison submitted (R1)
2023.6.20 With Editor; Under review
2023.10.23 Minor Revision (R#3: accept after minor revision)
2023.10.23 Revison submitted (R2)
2023.10.23 With Editor
2023.11.27 Accept
2023.12.1 Pre-proof published online
2023.12.12 Final version published online
It was quite fast for the first review, but it got slower as it progressed, waiting over a month after submitting the final revision

(0) 讚！ | Magical26

Is it not possible to see the manuscript on the review system after dragging it for a month?

(0) 讚！ | 475

Is it a major revision or a minor revision for the external review? How many reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 工地预备选手

Three reviewers have already agreed to review the 40-day RRC.

(37) 讚！ | 工地预备选手

After being rejected by two journals, the article was finally lucky enough to be accepted by GR. Overall, the process was very smooth, with a fast submission and review. After the first revision, it was accepted directly. The only thing to note is that GR will delay acceptance for 1 month after everything is fine. We were delayed for 2 months, longer than the review time, hahaha.

(6) 讚！ | 刘玉东

In the field of Earth Sciences, it has consistently ranked in the top tier for many years, and its influence and reputation are currently very good.

(53) 讚！ | 节节高

GR is now a leading journal in the field of geology, and it is indeed a bit difficult to reach that level. Our research group has been rejected several times already, but hopefully, we can submit it for review today!

(68) 讚！ | Communications

Same question, how long does it take to review?

(0) 讚！ | 北油沉积小陈

How long does it take to send for review?

(0) 讚！ | CookMai

The speed is too slow, always in the state of submitting to the Journal.

(0) 讚！ | 徘徊与盛世不堪的浮

Earth Science is ranked consistently in the top tier.

(0) 讚！ | 遥感人

May 20, 2022 Accept
The initial submission date was Sep 24, 2021
It took eight months.

(0) 讚！ | 广西郭富城

Unlike other disciplines such as environmental science and chemistry, it has always been our goal to publish an article in this journal. This journal has high innovation requirements and its positioning determines that. The review process is normal, taking about 4 months from submission to acceptance. However, my article was originally rejected by a Nature subjournal. It had a large research scale and workload, but the idea was good. I wish the journal continued to improve.

(0) 讚！ | 遥感人

Jan 11, 2022, with editor
Mar 21, 2022, Decision in Process
Repair: There is an editor confirming the review, but they have not yet provided their feedback.
Normally, the review process should take one month.
Wishing for good luck.

(0) 讚！ | 广西郭富城