I would like to ask if the author contributions and data availability statement required by the Green Chemistry submission guidelines can be included in the manuscript or should be extracted as a separate document.

(0) 讚！ | baipeng li

You can choose to resubmit to this journal after making revisions according to the feedback provided within your deadline.

(0) 讚！ | 那是真的困

Submission on 3/26
On 3/27, the email requested a supplementary explanation
A few days after submission: The editor provided very good and meaningful suggestions for modification. After making the changes, there was a system error that prevented submission. I sent an email but the editor did not receive it. The deadline passed and I had to withdraw the submission before realizing that I needed to resubmit immediately.
On 4/9, I resubmitted with a Response to Reviews, revised manuscript, and additional explanations. The editor received it, reviewed it, and sent it for review.
On 5/12, major revisions were requested with over 40 substantial suggestions, most of which were meaningful. I provided targeted explanations for the few suggestions that were difficult to modify (I was given 6 weeks to provide reasons for the delay).
On 6/14, the revised manuscript was resubmitted.
On 7/3, it was decided to make minor revisions, with only a few details needing to be modified.
On 7/4, the revised manuscript was resubmitted.
On 7/6, it was accepted.
The journal overall was relatively fast, with friendly reviewers and editors who were very patient.

(0) 讚！ | 杨宗宇

May I ask, is "Reject and re-submission" a suggestion from the editor, or did you revise it yourself and resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | baozao

Hello, OP. May I ask if "Reject and re-submission" is a suggestion from the editor or if you have made the modifications and resubmitted the article yourself? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | baozao

May I ask the original poster if the recommendation to resubmit after rejection is from the editor or if it is after making modifications by oneself before submitting again? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | baozao

18/6 2026: Minor repair
19/6 2026: Repair returned
19-21 coincided with the Dragon Boat Festival, and the repair returned on the 19th has not been processed.
22/6 2026: Accepted.

(1) 讚！ | orgcatal.

8/6 2026: Major repair
15/6 2026: Repair completed

(1) 讚！ | orgcatal.

After three rounds of review by four reviewers, it has been rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐66

Brother, so fast? May I ask which deputy editor handled the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | zhcj

25/5 2026: Submitted
28/5 2026: Under review
29/5 2026: Submitted 2, reviewed 1, returned 0
31/5 2026: Submitted 2, reviewed 2, returned 0
3/6 2026: Submitted 2, reviewed 2, returned 1
8/6 2026: Submitted 2, reviewed 2, returned 2

(0) 讚！ | orgcatal.

1. Initial assessment 10.28
2. With editor 10.31
3. In peer review 11.2
4. With editor 11.3
5. In peer review 11.4
6. With editor 11.17
7. In peer review 11.17
8. 11.20
9. 12.16
10. Submission of revised manuscript 12.26
11. Acceptance 1.14
12. Proofreading 1.29

(1) 讚！ | Huiqing Dong

When will you receive feedback later?

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

I am similar to you. I resubmitted on May 4th, and I have received feedback from two reviewers on May 22nd. However, it is still under IPR, and I'm not sure what the situation is.

(0) 讚！ | 晴天

5.11 found a third reviewer, and on 5.22, the review comments were submitted. It is still in the peer review status, and the editor has not taken any action yet.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐66

2025.01.09 submit
2025.01.16 in peer review
2025.01.20 with editor, in peer review
2025.02.04 major revision
2025.02.10 resubmit
2025.02.14 in peer review
2025.02.24 accept

(0) 讚！ | Snoopy-

The two reviewers have already provided feedback as of 4.30, but the manuscript is still in peer review status. The editor is not very efficient.

(0) 讚！ | 可乐66

On April 25th, it changed to "with editor." Did the reviewers disappear?

(0) 讚！ | kust

It is estimated that the reviewers are difficult to find, as the reviewers for this journal are all well-known figures who have previously published in this magazine.

(0) 讚！ | 西风

Choose the Cambridge team and your submission will be reviewed within three days.

(0) 讚！ | 西风

It's April 13th and it's still in peer review.

(1) 讚！ | kust

Submitted on January 13, 2026, the editor requested the addition of a table in the manuscript on January 21. It was uploaded on January 24, entered peer review on January 26, underwent major revision on February 18, and the revised manuscript was uploaded on March 18. It has been in peer review since March 19. We hope for an acceptance soon.

(0) 讚！ | kust

Boss, how many days does it take for the editor to review?

(0) 讚！ | 川师

Reviewers are hard to find, but the editors work quickly and are very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | FANTEXI

Same question, has the original poster resolved it?

(0) 讚！ | new123