This journal is the weirdest journal I have ever encountered, without a doubt. After the first round of review, I made revisions according to the reviewer's comments and all were accepted. One of the reviewers noticed a duplicate section title in a reference, which was a problem with the Elsevier template. It did not show as a duplicate when compiled on the computer, but the system generated a duplicate title. The reviewer pointed it out, and I made the necessary corrections, thanking the editor and reviewer in the process. I thought it was just a matter of deleting a small section title for the editor to review. However, the editor asked why I had not responded to the reviewer's comments. When I saw the email, I immediately wrote back to explain the situation. Within just a few minutes of receiving the email, the editor unexpectedly rejected the submission and requested for it to be resubmitted. I have never seen such outrageous actions before. This incident left me feeling disgusted, not because of the rejection, but purely due to the editor's behavior. I decided not to resubmit the manuscript, as it was just too repulsive.

(0) 讚！ | 函子

Starting from March 17th, the review process began. During this period, once a reviewer finished reviewing, there were no new reviewers assigned. In early May, I received an email saying that two new reviewers had been invited. It has been 3 months already, and I am wondering if everyone else is experiencing the same delay.

(0) 讚！ | ghq789

How about this journal? When will it be indexed by SCI?

(0) 讚！ | Chorocy