Our editorial policy is that only papers that reach the top 15-20% in terms of influence, novelty, and overall quality will be considered for publication. Unfortunately, after initial review, we regret to inform you that your submission did not meet the required standard, and therefore we are unable to continue with the review process. This screening process is designed to expedite decision-making and help authors avoid unnecessary waiting time.

For future submissions, please note that the Energy and Building Environment Committee considers papers that are well-written, clearly and effectively convey cutting-edge research findings, include relevant references to support the research, start with clear objectives and originality statements, include new knowledge, important results, and findings, and demonstrate consistency between objectives and conclusions.

Are you also considering papers that meet the top 15-20% submission level for EI?

(0) 讚！ | Pei·Chen

Translate the following paragraph into English: "Come and try out an innovative and trendy EI in the first district."

(0) 讚！ | Pei·Chen

Is it possible that it is poorly written?

(0) 讚！ | MrHooper

Submitted to editor for 3 days, rejected on the 4th day. Can only say to submit carefully.

(0) 讚！ | zy

Fast speed, professional review, open source and free, conscientious journal, looking forward to entering SCI

(0) 讚！ | tingalan

Journal rejected after major revisions for the first time.
The reviewer did not understand several basic concepts in the industry during the first review, raising over thirty questions. I responded and explained each question in the comments, but still received a rejection. The tragedy of rejection after major revisions wasted half a year from the initial submission

(0) 讚！ | dorrit