Submission on 2025-02-16
Still under first review, the review speed may be related to the research direction.

(0) 讚！ | Aplomb

Three reviewers, each with six or seven points. It seems quite common for articles to be rejected and resubmitted for IGRSL, as many below have experienced rejection and resubmission.

(0) 讚！ | 常棣

How many people provided feedback on the review? What is the probability of rejection and resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | 3%

2025-03-07 Submission
2025-04-09 Rejection and Re-submission

(0) 讚！ | 常棣

The journals of IEEE are under review from submission to acceptance. My paper is under external review.

(0) 讚！ | wang

Bro, do you have any updates now? Did the journal accept the submission or is it still under review?

(0) 讚！ | answer365

Brother, do you have any results now? Will this journal become "Under Review" once the submission is successful?

(0) 讚！ | answer365

First submission on February 22, 2025.
The editor rejected the submission on February 27, 2025, saying that the images in the article needed to be remade as they were not clear.
Submitted again on February 27, 2025.
No news yet. Should I give the bank full marks? Hope to receive feedback soon. I am currently in my second year of graduate school and hope to get published before graduation.

(0) 讚！ | wang

Very good journal, reviewers are fast and professional. Editors are responsible.

(0) 讚！ | 奔跑的鱼

Hello, I would like to ask, my status is "create a revision", with 21 days for modification. After I completed the modifications and submitted the response, is this the 8-day stage you mentioned?

(0) 讚！ | 猪肉炖粉条子

Could you please tell me how the layout fee is calculated?

(0) 讚！ | ZYS

Did you invest later on?

(0) 讚！ | 李H

24.5.14 submitted
24.7.16 reject and resubmit
24.9.6 resubmit
24.9.16 accept

(2) 讚！ | xiezilailai

Dude, why are you still investing when the reputation is bad? Don't bite the hand that feeds you and then blame it, should we just issue a warning tomorrow?

(2) 讚！ | 学吊一枚

The specific timeline is as follows: 
- 2024.07.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review 
- 2024.08.21 Manuscript Need Revision, with comments from two reviewers overall positive, estimated minor revisions needed 
- 2024.09.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review, with Response and revised paper submitted 
- 2024.09.10 Accept, with the associate editor's opinion being Accept as is 
Overall, the first review took longer, 50 days in total, while the second review only took 8 days, possibly due to the thorough and well-presented Response.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

The specific timeline is as follows:
2024.07.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review
2024.08.21 Manuscript Need Revision, a total of two reviewers provided feedback, overall positive evaluation, estimated to be a minor revision
2024.09.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review, submitted Response and revised paper
2024.09.10 Accept, the associate editor's opinion is Accept as is
Overall, the first review took longer, 50 days; the second review only took 8 days, possibly due to the comprehensive and well-presented Response.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

The review process was relatively fast this time, taking just over two months in total, and the reviewers' comments were constructive.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

2024 1.7 Submitted
2024 5.1 Revisions Required
2024 5.21 Revision submitted
2024 8.16 Accepted

It has completely deviated from the purpose of the letter, not recommended for submission in pursuit of speed.

(0) 讚！ | zcccy

I submitted the article for a year and was rejected and resubmitted twice. The process in between was very tumultuous and time-consuming, the efficiency of the journal was very low, with the first response taking 5 months. It is necessary to carefully submit research results as soon as possible. 

8/29/23 First submission
Waited for 5 months in between and sent a reminder
2/1/24 Reject and Resubmit - two reviewers, returned after revisions, their comments were not strict, suspecting the editors intentionally rejected the submission to shorten their average review time
3/15/24 Second submission
5/3/24 Reject and Resubmit - still two reviewers, revised and resubmitted, similar to the first time, reviewers' comments were not very strict
5/22/24 Third submission
7/30/24 Minor revision - same reviewers as the second time, one had no comments, the other had two minor points
7/31/24 Returned after revisions
8/7/24 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Logan_yiyuan

SUBMITTED 14-May-2024
Reject and Resubmit 16-Jul-2024
Should we resubmit again? The amount of work needed to make the required changes is quite significant...

(0) 讚！ | xiezilailai

You can resubmit, but you need to include the previous feedback and revisions, just like a major revision. However, resubmitting the same idea won't work unless you make some changes. Once you have addressed the other issues, you can resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | 编辑从不给我送审

Last year, I saw my peers all investing, so I tried it too. I didn't expect to win in just three months, although the reputation is not very good. In the past two years, it has been flooded with people doing machine learning, and anyone can develop a model easily. Now the impact factor has dropped to 4, as expected. If we don't control it, it may drop to 3 next year.

(0) 讚！ | 78文哥

Can I make a new submission after being rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 小木提欧人

Hope to return to District Two soon

(0) 讚！ | WithEnthusiasm

reject (08-feb-2024)
submitted(08-apr-2024)
revisions required (08-may-2024)
minor - a revision has been submitted（11-may-2024）
accept (06-jun-2024

(0) 讚！ | WithEnthusiasm