Submission on 9.11 Undergoing Review (ADM: Not Assigned) has not been assigned a handling editor yet.

(0) 讚！ | skaidjasij

9.11 submitted & Under Review.

(0) 讚！ | DnJuuuu

I received the results today and they accepted me.

(0) 讚！ | wutianhao502

- Round 1 (major revision review): 45 days
- Round 2 (major revision review): 44 days
- Round 3 (from minor revision feedback to giving feedback again): 33 days
Currently: It has been 40 days since the minor revision was resubmitted, but there is no news.

(0) 讚！ | 打倒学阀

This is my first major revision as well. Both of the previous reviewers had no objections to publication upon resubmission. However, a new reviewer raised five points of concern, and the Associate Editor, Dr. Gemine Vivone, also provided feedback.

(0) 讚！ | wutianhao502

I am in the same situation, constantly adding new reviewers. Who is your AE?

(0) 讚！ | 打倒学阀

8.24 Submitted for Review Undergoing Review

(0) 讚！ | hocking

2026.6.14 Submission

2026.7.20 Minor revisions

2026.7.27 Submission after minor revisions

2026.8.10 Acceptance

Thanks to the kind-hearted reviewer!!!!

(0) 讚！ | uikdsaui

How are things going now?

(0) 讚！ | daxibei

Submitted on February 4th, major revisions were suggested on March 23rd; resubmitted on April 8th, major revisions were suggested again on May 23rd. (The first review had two reviewers, one of whom approved it in the second review, while the other reviewer from the first round did not participate, and a new reviewer appeared).

Resubmitted on June 10th, received minor revisions on July 12th in the third round of reviews, this time with three reviewers. (The first reviewer, presumably the new one from the second review, mentioned that there were no major issues left, just some minor language expressions; the second reviewer, who seemed new, provided a lot of AI-generated comments but lacked expertise, and requested additional experiments; the third reviewer believed it was ready for publication).

Resubmitted on July 18th, still awaiting news. Feeling anxious as the material needs to be submitted for evaluation in September... Unsure if it will be ready in time... Without a background or support from influential figures, it's been tough working on this alone.

(1) 讚！ | 打倒学阀

I really can't understand this kind of operation. After submitting the manuscript, it took more than a month for major revisions, then another month for minor revisions. After the minor revisions, they rejected my submission. It wasted four months of my time. If you want to reject it, you could have done it earlier. Letting me revise and then rejecting it is a waste of time and energy. It's disgusting...

(1) 讚！ | 我来监督沙瑞金

July 27 major maintenance

(0) 讚！ | 爱太阳的松鼠

Good luck, 5.3 investment, it has been 2 and a half months and still no news, hoping to win.

(0) 讚！ | 爱太阳的松鼠

The initial review process takes at least one month to start, and it usually takes around one and a half months on average to receive the initial review results.

(0) 讚！ | shanshan

In 2026, it took 5 months for the submission process, with major revisions on 3.21, minor revisions on 4.27, and acceptance on 6.29. It feels okay, of course, the speed can't compare to MDPI. But the impact and recognition are still good!

(0) 讚！ | 何须精锐

Hello, I am in a similar situation. May I ask if you have any results yet?

(0) 讚！ | AndyY

How long is the review period for this manuscript? It has been submitted for over a month.

(0) 讚！ | 李丽丽说

This is really fast.

(0) 讚！ | 李丽丽说

Brother, how do you know how many reviewers have been invited?

(0) 讚！ | 卫星测高小菜鸡

How long does it take to receive feedback after the first review meeting? There were two reviewers in the first review, with no objections to the innovation. One recommended major revisions while the other recommended minor revisions. Why was a new reviewer invited after the first round of revisions? What is the reason for this?

(0) 讚！ | yuanxuetao

Hello, my situation is similar. Can I ask what the outcome was later on?

(0) 讚！ | zwt5677

The third review was rejected, and the third round reviewer highly suspected to be AI reviewer, completely ignored the modifications I made in the last round, suddenly changed their attitude, made their own decisions, and passionately rejected my submission... Wasting 7 months of my time. It left me with a deep psychological shadow.

(0) 讚！ | ftmnk

1 day under review, 18 days for the first review, with a total of 10 suggestions from two reviewers. The editor requested major revisions, which were completed in 9 days before final acceptance.

(1) 讚！ | 刘驰宇

Why is the progress so fast?

(0) 讚！ | 我是Fh

When encountering an AI reviewer, they made up a bunch of non-existent references for me to cite, leaving me speechless.

(0) 讚！ | helloworld30