I have been here for over a month.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

Have you urinated?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How long have you been away?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How long do we?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How many days have you been here?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How many days have you been here?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How many days are you off?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

How many days have you been?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

Submitted on July 7th, STJ will respond a few days later.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

Recently submitted an article to a journal, it was rejected. However, the feedback I received made me feel that the opinions were extremely unprofessional, almost like they were written by an AI. I was able to refute every single point, which is a first for me. While I have been rejected before, I have usually agreed with the majority of the reviewers' opinions.

(0) 讚！ | nikw

Oh my god, I also had one person review my manuscript in January, but haven't found a second one yet. I've been writing to the editor repeatedly, but it's no use. I'm planning to withdraw my submission directly.

(0) 讚！ | jiesss

What a terrible journal.

(0) 讚！ | wanggang1303

What about the follow-up?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

May I ask the teacher, how long does this stage last before moving on to the next one?

(0) 讚！ | lyb97

25.5.13 Submission
25.5.14 Submitted to Journal
(How can I delete comments on this website?)

(0) 讚！ | lyb97

How long does it usually take for this journal to work with the editor? It's been a month now and there hasn't been any progress.

(0) 讚！ | yy

So slow

(0) 讚！ | nini8983

The review process has been delayed for nearly a year because only one reviewer provided feedback, leading to the rejection of the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | nikw

Two weeks after submission, the editor provided feedback and requested major revisions. The feedback was helpful and constructive, with the reviewer expressing interest in my research and finding it very interesting. Overall, AGSS receives many submissions each year, but only a very small number are accepted, with emphasis placed on the novelty of the content.

(0) 讚！ | 上好佳

It's been three months now. The initial review took one month, and when the editor submitted it for review, they contacted six reviewers. However, none of them responded, so they left it there without further action. Even after reminders, the official response was that they were still looking for reviewers. Since the first submission on May 6th, they haven't found a seventh reviewer yet.

(0) 讚！ | CC12

5-21 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 苗大侠

The progress is slow, and it's still "with editor" after one month

(0) 讚！ | yaking

The main reason for the twisty process is still the content of the first attempt in the new field, leading to some errors in the methods. Overall, the editing speed is quite fast, and the attitude is very friendly and constructive. AgSy has a low volume of articles, and although the impact factor is lower than that of environmental journals, the quality and recognition are very high. The journal emphasizes mechanism and novelty. Systematic and diverse research in agriculture can be attempted

(0) 讚！ | GFX

2022/8/17 submitted to journal. 2022/8/18 with editor. 2022/8/19 under review. 2022/9/26 required review completed. 2022/9/29 reject. Three reviewers, one of whom was a major, all recognized the value of the data but identified major errors in the methodology. They recommended revisions and the editor allowed for resubmission.
2023/3/5 modified algorithm and resubmitted. 2023/3/5 with editor. 2023/3/11 under review. 2023/4/20 required review completed. 2023/4/26 minor. 2023/5/13 resubmitted. 2023/5/13 with editor. 2023/5/18 minor. The editor still believed that the language needed further improvement, so further revisions were made. 2023/5/23 resubmitted. 2023/5/24 with editor. 2023/5/26 accept

(2) 讚！ | GFX

2023-03-29 submitted to journal

Translation: The document was submitted to the journal on March 29, 2023.

(0) 讚！ | slfzhc