Yes, there were four reminders in the middle of a long time.

(0) 讚！ | zhang949

I also submitted mine on December 24th last year, but I still haven't received any response. I followed up once and they said they would expedite the process, but there has been no progress since.

(0) 讚！ | 研究生想毕业

You submitted this on August 11, 25 years ago, and it only returned on April 20 for the first review. Is it really taking this long?

(0) 讚！ | 研究生想毕业

The submission made in mid-January is still under review (UR) now, and despite urging the editor for a response in early April, there has been no change.

(0) 讚！ | heliumf

Returned. Rejected resubmission after minor and major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | zhang949

In the same direction, with the same editor responsible, two opinions were given - one rejecting the submission and one suggesting minor revisions, but ultimately it was rejected. The feedback from the rejection was also unreasonable, claiming that there was no comparison method used and it seemed as though they didn't carefully read the submission.

(0) 讚！ | Rae_chim

The main editor should be contacted through the old system at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sensors.

(0) 讚！ | 125

I submitted it on December 30, 2025, and it is still Under Review until April 18, 2026. I am inquiring about the results, which are exactly the same as yours.

(0) 讚！ | Xiaojin Liu

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for the results to come after the first review?

(0) 讚！ | T1 Faker

It has been one month since submission, and there has been no first review yet. I see on letpub that it's usually around one month, is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | Rainyyyyyyyy

The submission to DATP will start on August 11th. Four reminders have been sent in between. The first reminder mentioned that some feedback has been received and waiting for more reviewers' opinions. Subsequent reminders apologized for the urgency of the situation. As of now, it is still under review (UR). Does anyone know what the situation is?

(1) 讚！ | zhang949

Reject and resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | qianyingwei

Are two major revisions equivalent to two rejections and resubmissions?

(0) 讚！ | wangyqs

12.24ms, as of today 4.8, is still Under Review. I asked twice about the progress and was told they are waiting for more information from reviewers. This speed is driving me crazy. Does anyone know if I should follow up for the third time or just keep waiting?

(0) 讚！ | 云燮

Direction of DATP, responsible editor Chauhan, Shivani. Warning: Be cautious of this person, strongly suspected of making irresponsible decisions in order to meet the review deadline.

Rejected for resubmission twice, and ultimately rejected.
First resubmission: Reviewer 1 agreed to accept, Reviewer 2 rejected for resubmission.
Second resubmission: The editor changed the reviewer, new Reviewer 1 refused to accept (provided 4 comments, none of which were technical or related to experimental theory, purely subjective speculation), Reviewer 2 agreed to accept. The result was that the editor sided with Reviewer 1 and rejected the submission.

In the final response, Chauhan, Shivani provided some additional comments, continuing to follow Reviewer 1's viewpoint (pointing out issues that were not mentioned in the previous two revisions, likely not even read), wasting time and effort, and even trying to disgust you.

Personal speculation: In order to complete the review task quickly, a reviewer was hastily found, and the submission was rejected with flimsy reasons to control the acceptance rate of the journal. Both the journal and the individual are equally irresponsible, wasting the efforts and time of the authors, and are disgusting.

(4) 讚！ | hezizhili

Please review the email letter sent by the Editorial Office on 6 April 2026 for more information on necessary changes before resubmitting. I was rejected and asked to refer to the email sent by the Editorial Office for necessary modifications, but I haven't received any email. Does anyone know what's going on? How can I find out what the issues were that led to the rejection?

(0) 讚！ | 熊猫的腾飞

I chose the DATP direction for my submission, and that ADM just kept sending it back as a draft the next day. This experience is only for reference, hope it helps those in need~

(0) 讚！ | Guishe

25.12.7 submission
26.1.2 two major revisions
26.2.7 revise and resubmit
26.3.12 two acceptances and one minor revision
26.3.18 revise and resubmit
26.3.31 acceptance and confirmation

(1) 讚！ | qianyingwei

May I ask what the URL of the old system is? Can any kind person please tell me?

(0) 讚！ | 一片天@

Reply:

Submitted on 12.2

Both reviewers on 2.21 gave minor revisions, as suggested by the AE.

Returned on 2.24, still under review. In this situation, is the likelihood of rejection high? Will new reviewers be sought? Because not all suggestions were fully addressed, only two points were acknowledged as shortcomings with future prospects.

(0) 讚！ | 南京航空学院

Have you returned for repairs? Any updates?

(0) 讚！ | 马先生q

You can check the status in the old system. If the new system has been submitted, it should be "under review", and if the old system is "under review", it should have been approved.

(0) 讚！ | 辛

I didn't realize that ads can last this long. I have placed an ad as well, eagerly waiting for the results every day.

(0) 讚！ | 辛

Is my Graphical Abstract Image as impressive as in the article? No one seems to care.

(0) 讚！ | churysanth

I have submitted it 4 times, and each time it was returned by the editorial department as a draft. I am puzzled. 
Later I sent an email to inquire, and was told that the Graphical Abstract Image submitted cannot be the same as the one in the text!!! I need to redraw one!!
Submitted on 2026.03.27, Under Review.

(0) 讚！ | Guishe