期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering LetPub Score 8.4
53 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.8 Influence 8.1 Speed 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1545-5955 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 22.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8856 | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/t-ase | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 四半期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 840每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 3.47% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1545-5955%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: HIO 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-17 07:00:07 評論於 3 reviewers,: minor, reject , major, the editor recommend reject directly, is unfair ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 21:30:31 評論於 It has been over a month since waiting for RE's decision, and even sending emails to urge has only received the classic official response. It's frustrating. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 过 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 17:46:16 評論於 Today I am also in this situation. It seems that this situation has occurred during the first review, and now it has reappeared during the second review. The scores have changed to "under review". ![]() ![]() |
作者: 冲冲冲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 17:42:35 評論於 I have been in the first review for nearly 4 months, and in the second review for over 4 months. My status changed from AE recommendation back to the previous scoring and then back to UR, back to square one. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 等待 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 17:39:33 評論於 I also changed from being in the grading status to UR today. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 冲冲冲 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 17:35:20 評論於 I also changed from the grading status to Under Review today. ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept???? 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 15:32:54 評論於 Is it always this slow now? Controlling the reception rate. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 投了必中啊 領域: 数学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 15:26:00 評論於 I am also today! The second review has been scoring all along, and suddenly turned into UR this morning. Is there a problem with the system? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Z_Lee 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 14:30:06 評論於 2025.01.03 Submitted 2025.04.07 Revise and Resubmit 2025.05.14 Resubmit 2025.06.03 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2025.07.18 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 2025.08.28 Awaiting Reviewing Editor Decision The first review took three months with two reviewers, which isn't too long. It's been over four months since the second review, waiting for the Associate Editor recommendation for 40 days, and now it's almost 20 days waiting for the Reviewing Editor decision. Please, Reviewing Editor, provide a decision soon. ![]() ![]() |
作者: taro3144 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 11:02:16 評論於 Me too, almost the same as "Endow". ![]() ![]() |
作者: Endow 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 09:27:30 評論於 I am the same. After receiving conditional acceptance in the second round, I planned to resubmit in mid-August. However, up until yesterday, my status had always been "scores," but today it suddenly changed to "under review." I don't know what happened... ![]() ![]() |
作者: Gov 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 09:05:08 評論於 The second review took about a month and a half, and it took almost two weeks for the reviewer to accept the manuscript. Then it was under review for a month, and suddenly changed to "under review." In my impression, the first review was also like this, where it suddenly went from scores to review, but quickly received a revise and resubmit decision. I don't know what will happen this time, hopefully it will be a good outcome. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Gov 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-16 08:54:24 評論於 I don't know if you have seen the scores stage at the second review. My application went through the scores stage for a month, and suddenly it changed to "under review." It seems like it also suddenly changed during the first review, but a decision was quickly made. I am currently still waiting for the second review. ![]() ![]() |
作者: lyd 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-15 20:57:50 評論於 Is "Under Review" already submitted for review? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-13 08:55:07 評論於 Just a group of grass-roots. ![]() ![]() |
作者: James Wu 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-12 11:30:16 評論於 There were three comments, just a few lines each, suggesting additional experiments. The first reviewer was the most amusing, saying, "I have never seen a paper with two abstracts, I suggest combining them into one." I couldn't help but laugh. The Note to practitioner is a requirement from the TASE journal, and it was mistaken for "two abstracts" that needed to be merged into one! Furthermore, the reviewer mentioned that I used a lot of abbreviations in the main text but didn't follow through with them later on. I found it hilarious, as there were only three abbreviations in total: DoF, XXR (certain robot), and XXM (certain model). Is that too many? Did I not use them? Additionally, the reviewer didn't seem to understand what inline equations are, saying my equations were not numbered. But really, why would a formula that doesn't need to be referenced be numbered? This reviewer is just talking nonsense! ![]() ![]() |
作者: Endow 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 07:52:02 評論於 I hope that your second review can be directly accepted. My second review was conditionally accepted last month for resubmission, and another month has passed. This third round will probably take another three to four months. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 猫猫的咖啡屋 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-11 07:11:21 評論於 The first submission was made on January 15th, and after 4 months it was returned for revisions. Now it has been another 4 months for the second review, and the status has changed from being recommended by the Associate Editor to waiting for reviewers' scores. At this rate, one month for review, two months in the editor's hands, and another three months to go. Anyway, I dare not submit in the future. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小黄9898 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-10 17:38:24 評論於 It has been a week since awaiting Associate Editor assignment. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Endow 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-10 15:03:57 評論於 I met this Korean person when I applied for RAL six months ago, and I felt like they responded pretty quickly. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-10 10:32:03 評論於 It's been a month since the decision, it's really slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-10 10:30:09 評論於 Korean person ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小黄9898 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-09 15:28:21 評論於 Moon, Hyungpil, have you met this person before? ![]() ![]() |
作者: jyx 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-08 16:11:11 評論於 An external audit has been going on for nearly 4 months now, and there have been no changes yet. I really don't dare to invest. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 洗衣匠 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-07 12:42:27 評論於 Is this slow on purpose? ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us