One reviewer completely agrees to accept the submission, while the other has just two issues and has decided to reject it outright.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

One very positive, one average.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

Is this journal only in one status "Under Review"? How long does it usually take to receive a review result? It has been almost two months since submission and the status has not changed at all.

(0) 讚！ | 虎娃2宝贝

Translation: Slow down, urging for submission is just a superficial response. One review, two revisions, one rejection from the editor. If you're in a hurry, please don't submit.

(0) 讚！ | XyyyF

Waited for 6 months and got rejected directly... How did your second review go?

(0) 讚！ | cnzhu

It's been six months since my second trial, and I feel like it's not looking good.

(0) 讚！ | Backer

A pile of shit journal, first review took 10 months, resubmission for second review took 6 months, only to be rejected by reviewer 2 for two very simple questions. Currently in the process of appeal. Think twice before submitting.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

I feel the same way. I don't want to rush anymore, it's useless. It's been 5 months since the second review.

(0) 讚！ | Backer

Finally waiting for this thesis to graduate, waited for half a year after the first review and still no news. The two editors kept passing the buck, it's really annoying.

(0) 讚！ | cnzhu

I sent an email directly to the adm, it seems like the first time was through the review system, and later I sent it directly to the other party's email, including the manuscript information.

(0) 讚！ | LZY0303

Did you send your reminder email directly to the ADM in the system?

(0) 讚！ | cnzhu

I am too, it's already been seven months. It's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | 牛马牛马

When the article review feedback was returned, it felt like I didn't see any AE, it seems like the editorial department handled it for me.

(0) 讚！ | Carraway

Hello, OP, may I ask if there is also a deputy editor AE in your feedback?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

On October 9, 2024, the article was accepted for publication after nearly three months of second round review, which was incredibly slow. In total, it took nine months for the first review and three months for the second review, making it more than a year of back and forth. Fortunately, I submitted as a second-year Ph.D. student. If it had been submitted as a third-year Ph.D. student, it would have been unbearable.

(0) 讚！ | Carraway

September 26th has been accepted.

(0) 讚！ | LZY0303

Is there any news on the second trial?

(0) 讚！ | 1111

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive the notification for the second review? Have you been finally hired?

(0) 讚！ | Backer

Translate the following paragraph into English: 

Direct investment
Submitted on January 2, 2024
First-instance opinions on March 24, 2024
Revised draft uploaded on May 23, 2024
No results as of August 28, 2024
Sent an email reminder before the first-instance opinions came back, and also reminded a few days ago.

(0) 讚！ | LZY0303

I also have not received any comments from the AE. I guess we have the same AE. I received the first review comments on July 12th.

(0) 讚！ | 1111

请提供要翻译的文本。

(0) 讚！ | huaxianzi122

On July 12, 2024, after nearly 10 months, we finally received the review comments. There were only 2 reviewers and their comments were not extensive. However, the speed of the review process was confusing, and it appears that the Associate Editor is no longer involved, as the comments were directly compiled by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Carraway

On July 12, 2024, after nearly 10 months, we finally received the review comments. There were only 2 reviewers and their comments were not extensive. However, the speed of the process was confusing, and it appears that the Associate Editor (AE) is no longer involved as the comments were directly compiled by the editor.

(0) 讚！ | Carraway

Is there a result?

(0) 讚！ | pyyswag

The first review took more than four months, and the second review took more than three months. There were three reviewers in total, and the revision comments they provided were profound. It was initially hard to understand the meaning, but after some time, it suddenly became clear. The editor combined the opinions of the three reviewers and proposed a clear revision plan, which greatly helped improve the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | roy911