The day after the doctorate reported, he received an email. At that time, just finished packing up the dormitory and collapsed on the bed. When he saw the email, he had a premonition that he didn't need to revise anymore. He clicked on it and scrolled down line by line, finally seeing "accept," feeling calm yet somewhat unreal.

The idea for the article started in March 2025, and after three months of collaboration with colleagues, it was submitted in June. There were two rounds of revisions, and it was accepted in September the following year. This was the first article as the first author, and it was accepted on the day after reporting for duty. It was like a teacher's day gift to the supervisor after sending Teacher's Day greetings, which was quite a coincidence.

Thanks to friends who worked on the article together, and thanks to the supervisor for countless revisions. Congratulations to us!

The second round of revisions coincided with the outbreak of Agent, and thanks to codex, Claude Code (DPSK version), and others for their hard work in conducting experiments and organizing data. Writing papers in the future will be in good times. Although it can also be foreseen that lower thresholds mean intensified competition, and journals and conferences will face an unprecedented flood of submissions, editors and reviewers will experience a chaotic period.

This article, marking the end of the pre-AGI era, will soon be outdated in the new productivity and research system brought by Agent. We must quickly occupy our position in the wind of the arrival of Agent.

There is still a long road ahead for the next four or five years. This is a belated gift, and I hope it is a good start.

Once again, congratulations to us!

(0) 讚！ | qjly

School has started again and four months have passed. 
26.6.22 resubmit 
26.6.22 Assign additional Reviewers 
26.6.24 Awaiting Review Scores 
26.7.5 Awaiting AE Recommendation 
26.7.25 Minor Revision 
26.8.9 submit 
26.8.9 Inviting reviewers 
26.8.13 Waiting for Reviews 
26.8.16 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 
26.8.18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 
26.9.11 Accept

(0) 讚！ | qjly

25.12.17 resubmit
25.12.27 Assign additional Reviewers
25.12.29 Awaiting Review Scores
26.1.11 Awaiting AE Recommendation
26.2.12 Awaiting EIC Decision
26.2.13 Reject with the Option to Resubmit

(0) 讚！ | qjly

25.6.16 submit
25.6.18 assign ElC: Zhang, Yan
25.6.19 Awaiting AE Assignment
25.6.30 Assigning Reviewers
25.7.9 Assign additional Reviewers
25.7.9 Awaiting Review Scores
25.8.7 Awaiting AE Recommendation
25.9.2 Awaiting EIC Decision
25.9.4 Reject with the Option to Resubmit
(under review for 3 months)

(0) 讚！ | qjly

Please send an email to ADM, asking him to forward it to AE. ADM will then pass on AE's feedback to you.

(0) 讚！ | inqi

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 111

(0) 讚！ | inqi

I did pass like this... The identity information was filled in the system on the title page first, but the cover letter was not filled in and was sent back. I also inquired by email. Finally, all identity information was removed from the title page and only a title was left, and I passed. I submitted it at the end of last month and now additional reviewers are being assigned.

(0) 讚！ | wazmen123

I did pass like this indeed... The personal information was filled in the system on the title page first, then the cover letter was filled out. It was rejected because the identity information was not filled out. I also inquired via email. Finally, all identity information was removed from the title page, leaving only a title, and it passed. It was submitted at the end of last month, and now additional reviewers are being assigned.

(0) 讚！ | wazmen123

Big boss, two reviewers have accepted, one has some comments and requested minor revisions. However, this person is too slow in responding after revisions. How can we contact the Associate Editor (AE) for assistance?

(0) 讚！ | Ha

Stop talking nonsense... Don't mislead people, the title page of a double-blind journal is specifically for filling in author information.

(0) 讚！ | Leon-Xp

The cover letter cannot contain author information, while the title page must have author information. If the title page does not have author information, won't it be easy to change the author?

(0) 讚！ | wwhhtt333

Thanks to all the experts for providing answers.

(0) 讚！ | yomi_icecat

In addition to the cover letter, the title page should also not contain any personal information. The previous submission was rejected because of this. The second submission only included a title, which was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | wazmen123

The cover letter should also not include any information about the author.

(0) 讚！ | 一定Accepted

Hello everyone, I submitted a zip file containing a LaTeX draft, images, and a PDF (all without author information), along with a title page (which does have author information, as the website stated it was required). The cover letter is in text form as per the website instructions, and it includes the signature of the corresponding author. Could the issue possibly be related to the cover letter violating the double-blind policy and resulting in the submission being returned?

(0) 讚！ | yomi_icecat

In the era of AI manuscript review, submitting articles is quite challenging... 
2026.1.15——submit
2026.04.17——Awaiting Review Scores
2026.04.26——Reject with the Option to Resubmit (three reviewers)
2026.06.23——Submitted
2026.07.20——Reject with the Option to Resubmit (one reviewer added)
2026.08.04——Submitted
2026.08.22——Minor Revision (one reviewer asked for additional experiments but then disappeared, one more reviewer added to request more experiments)
2026.08.25——Submitted (new reviewer delaying decision, applying to AE)
2026.09.01——Accept

(0) 讚！ | inqi

After the RR, the maximum number of pages is 12. If the main text cannot fit, you can try to write a supplementary material, which should be submitted separately and does not count towards the page limit.

(0) 讚！ | Oli98

The supplemental ablation experiment has become a routine operation for AI peer review. It seems like you have to include one to pass the AI peer review.

(0) 讚！ | 不爱可言

Is it a rejection and resubmission or just a rejection? If it's a rejection and resubmission, it's essentially a major revision. This journal is just looking to increase their publications, they won't accept major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Leon-Xp

What a rubbish! Submitted on June 18, the results came out on September 3. There were three reviewers, one had very good opinions, and the other two had no major issues, just suggesting to supplement ablative experiments. But it was directly rejected. Is this even human????

(0) 讚！ | domino11

Is Little Xiu rejecting it??????????

(0) 讚！ | Leon-Xp

What is AE's comment? Xiaoxiu rarely rejects submissions.

(0) 讚！ | wwhhtt333

Three reviewers, one gave a pass, one disappeared, and one did not pass. After two reminders, on the day of the second reminder, the ADM sent an email to the EIC, and then it was rejected.
PS: AE is just a scumbag, is Gao Zhiwei's student, but the academic level is worrying, and he is not responsible for being an AE (Reihane Rahimilarki). From now on, I have a bad stereotype of Iranian women.

(0) 讚！ | 还是匿名吧

EIC: Liu, Honghai
ADM: Bansal, Disha

03-02-2026 submitted
04-02-2026 Awaiting Admin Processing
04-02-2026 Awaiting AE Assignment
05-02-2026 Assigning Reviewers
13-03-2026 Awaiting Review Scores
25-03-2026 Awaiting AE Recommendation
30-03-2026 Awaiting EIC Decision
31-03-2026 Minor Revision
17-04-2026 a revision has been submitted
17-04-2026 Inviting reviewers
05-05-2026 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
01-07-2026 First inquiry to ADM on manuscript status
18-08-2026 Second inquiry to ADM on manuscript status
18-08-2026 Reject

(0) 讚！ | 还是匿名吧

EIC: Yin, Shen
ADM: Bansal, Disha
2026.08.22 Submit
2026.08.24 Awaiting AE Assignment
2026.08.24 Assigning Reviewers
2026.09.02 Assign additional Reviewers

(0) 讚！ | Leon-Xp