Yes, it must be an IAS conference. In addition, after submitting the paper, there was no further communication with the editor until the submission link was provided, with emails exchanged at that time. The process was not slow, with each stage taking approximately 1-2 months.

(0) 讚！ | LYIEEE

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 25.05.16 accept

(0) 讚！ | carambola

25.05.14 Still in review

(0) 讚！ | carambola

Hello, I sent an email to the chief editor and the editors. Will there be an automatic reply, or do I have to keep waiting?

(0) 讚！ | 小旭组

Hello, may I ask if there will be an automatic reply after sending a long abstract email, or do we have to wait until the agreed time to receive a notification email?

(0) 讚！ | 小旭组

Okay, thank you. Also, may I ask if it is necessary to attend the meeting under IAS?

(0) 讚！ | 3/2700

Yes, the conference must be transferred to, and the information about the conference paper must be sent via email with a link, and it will also be required to provide the DOI number of the conference paper.

(0) 讚！ | LYIEEE

Do we have to attend the meeting, or can we just contact the editor directly for a submission invitation?

(0) 讚！ | 3/2700

2025.02.07 submitted
Three feedbacks from fellow students came back on 2025.04.01, and the first reminder letter was sent.
On 2025.05.06, the second reminder was sent after the holiday, but it was rejected that evening. One expert did not specify the issues in the feedback, mentioning that the format did not comply with the template, the introduction was unclear, the literature was too old, and there were abbreviation problems (which were not identified). It seems that the reminders were too urgent, so we should be cautious in sending them.

(0) 讚！ | 瓜皮V

24.10.08 submit
24.12.30 Return to author for mandatory revisions
25.01.21 submit
25.03.11 Return to author for mandatory revisions
25.03.31 submit
still in review now

Is the timeline reasonable, dear experts? Will it be rejected in the third review? The result of the second review is two reviewers recommending acceptance, while one reviewer stating there is no contribution.

(0) 讚！ | carambola

12.9 In Review
1.11 Awaiting Decision
1.12 Return to author for mandatory revisions
2.09 In Review
3.23 Awaiting Decision
3.28 Return to author for mandatory revisions
4.3 In Review
4.4 Accept for publication in Transactions (04-Apr-2025)

The paper was transferred from the ICEMS conference, and the opinions of the four experts were good. After the first round of major revisions and a second round of minor revisions from the Associate Editor (AE) but major revisions from the Editor-in-Chief (EIC), the paper was accepted for publication within one day. The process was very fast.

(0) 讚！ | 等天黑

Thank you, boss. ?

(0) 讚！ | lyl

Yes, no page limit.

(0) 讚！ | LYIEEE

Excuse me, are there any page limits for submissions to the special issue of TIA? Will there be an extra page fee for submissions exceeding 10 pages?

(0) 讚！ | lyl

Does this journal have any hope without any IEEE members?

(0) 讚！ | 球鞋不要水晶底

Do the experimental data need to be uploaded?

(0) 讚！ | 投稿必中小王子

The manuscripts were submitted in mid-October, and the first review comments were received in early December. In less than two months, some received comments after two and a half months, while others after one and a half months. 
The revised manuscripts were submitted in early January of the following year, and after the Chinese New Year break, acceptance notifications were received in mid-February, taking about a month and a half. 
Overall, the acceptance difficulty is considered acceptable. Most of the manuscripts submitted by peers have received first review comments and have not been directly rejected, but experimental data is required.

(0) 讚！ | sci基金多多中

Roughly speaking, I changed to "Awaiting EiC Processing" on 1.20, and received the email for early access on 2.12.

(0) 讚！ | LYIEEE

Hello, how long does it usually take for the paper that has been accepted for publication to undergo EiC processing? It has been about half a month and I'm not sure if this is normal.

(0) 讚！ | nulia

After the ECCE conference, I submitted my paper for publication, and the process was a bit convoluted. I had to request the submission link twice before it was finally accepted.
7/26/2024 - Requested submission link
8/13/2024 - Received response that it did not meet the theme
8/16/2024 - Requested link again
8/30/2024 - Organizing committee requested link
9/2/2024 - Invited to submit
9/3/2024 - Submitted
9/7/2024 - Review process began
10/25/2024 - Awaiting decision
11/4/2024 - Major revision
12/2/2024 - Resubmitted
1/7/2025 - Awaiting decision
1/18/2025 - Accepted for publication in Transactions.

(0) 讚！ | LYIEEE

The special issue submissions will be reviewed based on the scheduled timeline when the call for papers is announced on the official website:

March 1, 2024: Deadline for submitting extended abstracts 
April 1, 2024: Notification to submit full papers 
May 11, 2024: Deadline for submitting full papers for review in ScholarOne
May 13, 2024: Papers are under review
July 31, 2024: Authors will receive feedback for mandatory revisions
August 31, 2024: Deadline to submit revised versions & papers are under review
November 22, 2024: Final decision pending
November 28, 2024: Papers accepted for publication in Transactions.

(0) 讚！ | 收敛的多面体

Do I have to attend the conference first before being invited to submit a journal paper?

(0) 讚！ | chahahaha

At the beginning, the meeting offered a chance to switch, and I took the easy way out and invested in this thing. It's really hard to evaluate, if you can't understand the paper, it's fine, but asking some questions makes it hard to understand, a consultant explained it to you three times and still said you didn't understand, after 9 months I was rejected, I really want to swear. The processing speed started at two months per round, and I really don't recommend it

(0) 讚！ | IEEE_Fellow

Manuscript received 27 August 2023;
revised 30 December 2023;
accepted 25 February 2024

(0) 讚！ | 飞鹰崽崽

You should contact the journal editor instead of the conference organizer

(0) 讚！ | cccccl