The second review has been submitted, awaiting the third review, it has been 14 days already.

(0) 讚！ | mqw

2025.6.10 Submitted EIC DE ADM
2025.9.15 In Peer Review

2025年6月10日提交EIC DE ADM
2025年9月15日正在同行评审中

(0) 讚！ | jxbs

Why can I see UR in the new system, but cannot see the records in the old system?

(0) 讚！ | iopzhu

Submission timeline:
2025.8.29 Submitted with EIC ADM, DE not assigned
2025.9.11 Submitted with EIC DE ADM

(0) 讚！ | yeung1111

It's been three months and it's still submitted...

(0) 讚！ | jxbs

Does TIFS have three reviews? The minor revision from the second review has been returned for 10 days, and the old system displays "In Peer Review".

(0) 讚！ | JINGaccess

Check if it is in the attachment, some reviewers may choose to upload the review file separately.

(0) 讚！ | Tom Gons

I'm feeling very bad. Out of the three reviewers, two provided revisions and related comments, while one directly rejected without any feedback. It was the first time I encountered a reviewer who rejected without any comments or reasons.

(0) 讚！ | xia

Please translate the following passage into English: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tifs-ieee

(0) 讚！ | 科研机器人7号

Can I check the status of my submission in the new system? I submitted on 6.13, at that time it seemed like only submissions through the new system were accepted, and it was only showing as "under review" status.

(0) 讚！ | 冲冲冲～

Is the submission made in the new system?

(0) 讚！ | 冲冲冲～

Is the only status change of the new system Under Review? Are there any channels for viewing? Thank you ?

(0) 讚！ | 冲冲冲～

There are a total of three reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 科研机器人7号

How many reviewers do you have?

(0) 讚！ | kenshinj

Providing a TIME LINE for reference, it took about 7 months from submission to acceptance, with responsible reviewers and editors. 
January 6, 2025 - Submission 
April 16, 2025 - Peer review 
June 28, 2025 - Major revision 
July 28, 2025 - Minor revision 
August 15, 2025 - Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 科研机器人7号

Did the email mention the reasons for rejection?

(0) 讚！ | Aph3lios_

First submission, contributed a rejected timeline:

2025.04.23 Submitted
2025.04.30 Desk evaluation arranged, submitted
2025.06.09 Assigned to SAE, in peer review
2025.06.12 Returned to submitted status
2025.08.05 Assigned to AE, in peer review
2025.08.24 Direct desk rejection by AE

After 4 months, without receiving any review comments, it was directly rejected. Completely confused by this journal.

(0) 讚！ | daifeng97

It was also invested on July 21st, with the ID number 22891.

(0) 讚！ | 心动的信号

It's been over two months and it's still submitted.

(0) 讚！ | jxbs

Three reviewers, two RQs, one AQ.

(0) 讚！ | 千问mov

Boss, may I ask how many reviewers you have and if they all provided their reviews?

(0) 讚！ | 科研机器人7号

I am very happy to have a paper accepted. Overall, the journal's speed is relatively fast, although the first review took a little longer. The reviewers are very professional and provided great help with the paper.

12/24/17 Submitted
5/11/24 AE decision 
5/17/24 MAJOR REVISION 
6/26/25 Resubmitted
7/21/25 AE decision 
7/24/25 AQE 
7/31/25 Resubmitted 
8/10/25 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 千问mov

My opinions are few, I can only contribute about two to three points ?. Adding some background and related work would be helpful.

(0) 讚！ | 小木宠

What is the opinion of the second review on the minor revisions? Do we need to make a lot of changes?

(0) 讚！ | AAA_0520

What is the opinion on the minor repairs in the second round of rework? Can it be fixed in two days?

(0) 讚！ | AAA_0520