Can the old system still be used? When I click on it, there is no response. Is there a link available?

(0) 讚！ | Gov

Can you still log into the old system now? I can only access the new system, which is currently under review. I don't know what's going on.

(0) 讚！ | Gov

I emailed the editor-in-chief directly, and after sending three emails, I received the first review comments 17 months later.

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

A little over a week.

(0) 讚！ | Dylan_jcz

How long has the second trial been?

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

The second review is still under review. Will the status of the second review system change like the first review?

(0) 讚！ | Dylan_jcz

Be cautious in submitting!! I went through a 14-month review process, with one major revision, one minor revision, and finally a rejection.

(0) 讚！ | juliuss

@Dylan_jcz has been sent back into the system for modifying and resubmitting the content.

(0) 讚！ | 你的名字我的故事

What does "打回来" mean?

(0) 讚！ | Dylan_jcz

Under review means that the manuscript is currently with the editor. If it has not changed to Awaiting Reviewer Assign, it indicates that the manuscript has been sent for review but the required number of reviewers has not been assigned yet. If it has not changed, you may consider following up.

(0) 讚！ | 你的名字我的故事

@Jiayi Cao, my review comments are two major revisions, one minor revision, and one rejection. The editor suggested a resubmission after rejection, but when I submitted the response letter, it was rejected, saying it could not influence the subsequent reviewers. It seems like a resubmission is the only option, as the reviewers will likely be new. It's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 你的名字我的故事

2026.08.04 Awaiting Admin Processing
2026.08.22 Draft
2026.08.24 Awaiting Admin Processing
2026.09.02 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2026.09.03 Awaiting AE Recommendation
2026.09.08 Awaiting EIC Decision
2026.09.28 Reject

The author's name was incorrect in the middle, and it was sent back to me. After resubmission, it was quickly sent for review, and the reviewers were gathered on the same day. However, it went directly to the editor recommendation stage a day later, which made me feel uneasy. I have never encountered such a fast process before. Even if the reviewers were quick, it usually takes at least two or three opinions before reaching the editor recommendation stage. This speed was clearly abnormal. As expected, only one opinion was received, indicating that the reviewers did not propose any new methods and instead used existing ones. This left me speechless. If I could have proposed a completely new method, do you think I would not have submitted to top journals like A, TPAMI? I have no choice.

(0) 讚！ | 你的名字我的故事

I'm not feeling well. Everyone on Xiaohongshu is faster than me. Some people who submitted in June have already received their first review results. You must have submitted for review. I see many people skip showing the middle process, just UR and then jump directly to EIC.

(0) 讚！ | Ru5ty

Reviewed three rounds, taking more than a year, updated to complete status! It is a process change for the old system.
2025.08.23 submitted,
2025.09 awaiting admin processing (forgot the exact date)
2025.09 awaiting ae assignment
2026.01 awaiting reviewer scores
2026.03 awaiting ae recommendation
2026.03 awaiting eic decision
2026.03.22 revise and resubmit (2 major)

2026.04.08 submitted
2026.04.13 awaiting reviewer scores
2026.06.10 awaiting eic decision
2026.06.17 revise and resubmit (2 accept, 1 major, new reviewer added)

(0) 讚！ | zw

Did it get accepted directly after the first trial?

(0) 讚！ | Chaochaoseu

2026.07.03 submitted, Under review
2026.07.06 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2026.07.13 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2026.09.16 Awaiting EIC Decision
2026.09.30 Accept As Regular Paper

(0) 讚！ | zw