I should consider myself lucky, but I see others who have accepted the news of their second round of rejections even faster than me. In the end, it's good that I have finally accepted it.

(0) 讚！ | 隔壁老王dd

@Yuchen, can I ask you again, have you ever sent a follow-up letter to the editor-in-chief in the reminder letter you wrote?

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "同，从awaiting eic decision退回awaiting ae recommendation"

"Same, changed from awaiting EIC decision to awaiting AE recommendation."

(0) 讚！ | 靓仔1997

How often does the editor go online? We've been waiting for the editor's decision for a long time.

(2) 讚！ | 靓仔1997

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems Regular Papers

24 July 2025 Submission Started

27 July 2025 Submitted On

27 July 2025 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | lili

May I ask how things are going with the original poster? I am in a similar situation, with ae-eic-ae-eic.

(0) 讚！ | terrqaas

May I ask how things are going after that? I am also in a similar situation, with ae-eic-ae-eic.

(0) 讚！ | terrqaas

May I ask how things will proceed from here? I am in the same situation.

(0) 讚！ | terrqaas

@ Next door neighbor Lao Wang, you accepted it in just two months? What magical speed is this?

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

How does the status change before revise and resubmit?

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

My paper has never appeared in the status of Awaiting Reviewer Scores. It has been stuck in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment and Under Review, and has been waiting for the first review result for 8 months.

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

What is the specific focus of the research in this article? I suspect that this journal takes a very long time to review articles in this specific area.

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

The paper was submitted in March, underwent major revisions in April, and both reviewers had suggestions for major revisions. The project was very busy, causing a delay of one month before the revisions were completed and resubmitted in May. On July 11th, there was a revise and resubmit request from the same two reviewers, with one accepting and one minor revision required. However, the editor still requested major revisions. On the morning of July 21st, the paper was resubmitted again, and by 10 pm the same day, the decision came back as accepted after a quick review by the editor. Overall, the process went quite smoothly this time. The authors on the list are not well-known in the industry, and not even one is an IEEE student member. All of them are bald.

(0) 讚！ | 乐乐乐乐

The new system's second review was returned for revision, while the old system's status changed from "Under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" on the same day. After a week, it changed back to "Under review." What is the situation here?

(1) 讚！ | 靓仔1997

July 20, 2025 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

(0) 讚！ | iiisy

20-July-2025 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

(0) 讚！ | iiisy

Huh? Rejecting directly with a 3-1 ratio? Just reject if there is a rejection? Not even giving a chance for resubmission?

(0) 讚！ | 王春晖2480

I also went back to this time last month, probably because they added more reviewers. Today the results came out, with 3 major revisions and 1 rejection, and mine was rejected. However, the journal seems good.

(0) 讚！ | X流

This is really fast.

(0) 讚！ | xiaomanaha

The new system for submissions does not show specific process information.
2024-12-23 submit
2025-03-03 revise & resubmit Four reviewers, three major revisions and one minor revision
2025-05-21 revise Added quite a few experiments
2025-07-09 revise & resubmit One reviewer dropped out, leaving three reviewers with one major revision, one minor revision, and one acceptance. However, the major revision only had a few simple suggestions.
2025-07-13 revise
2025-07-14 accept Surprisingly, the paper was accepted the day after revisions. Thanks to the responsible AE and reviewers!

(1) 讚！ | Uddd-

Update the progress
2025.7.15 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 隔壁老王dd

Now it feels like the processing speed of the tits is getting faster, much faster than before.

(0) 讚！ | 隔壁老王dd

I am also on page 17, but today I received a notification asking to reduce the number of pages, and it was given in draft status...

(0) 讚！ | 阿诺

Yes, regular paper.

(0) 讚！ | sheldon

Excuse me, experts, is there a high possibility of rejection in the third review? In the second review, the reviewer pointed out that the scope of the paper does not match the journal and requested more theoretical and methodological evidence, as well as additional experimental scenarios. There were already many changes made in the first review, and I have no idea how to proceed.

(0) 讚！ | Cchening