Has it been resolved yet? Mine has always been in the "under consideration" status.

(0) 讚！ | zhao0902

Could you please confirm if the OP has resolved this issue? My submission also has an author who has not confirmed their ORCID, and it has been in the "Submitted" status for a month now.

(0) 讚！ | cssjj

How long have you been waiting? I have been waiting for three months already. Could it be because some authors have not linked their ORCID, causing the delay?

(0) 讚！ | Ogdulmish

The first review took 5 months to reject (major, minor, reject). After rejection, is it necessary to include a response letter when resubmitting?

(0) 讚！ | 不爱发TIT

So that's how it is, the first time being dragged by ADM for so long.

(0) 讚！ | 认真的贝吉特

The status of the old system is more detailed.

I sent an email to the administrator over five weeks ago, and they replied that they were on vacation at the time but have since returned and are now working on it. However, it has been almost two months now and it is still in the submitted status.

(0) 讚！ | abcd**

There is a manuscript number, which is visible in the new system. The status after submission is UR.

(0) 讚！ | 认真的贝吉特

It seems like it, did you check directly on the old submission system for ur?

And you didn't receive any email? At least there should be a submission number.

(0) 讚！ | abcd**

Submission Experience:
2025-07-03: submitted
2025-07-04: Under Review
However, I have not received any email stating that the editor has started reviewing my submission, which is supposed to be the prescreening process. Does each author now need to confirm their ORCID with the editor before the review process begins?

(0) 讚！ | 认真的贝吉特

It seems that I really need to verify my ORCID before proceeding to the next steps. It has been stuck for a month now.

(0) 讚！ | abcd**

Do all authors need to confirm their ORCID IDs before the TSP submission can be processed by the editors?

(0) 讚！ | 认真的贝吉特

Don't worry about the Chinese Academy of Sciences' divisions, just submit your paper. If you always follow the Chinese Academy of Sciences, you will only be submitting to some mediocre so-called first-tier journals. In the long run, you will suffer losses.

(0) 讚！ | 大浪淘沙

Submit the first draft on December 12, 2024.
Major revision on March 19, 2025.
Submit major revision on May 18, 2025.
Accepted on June 26, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 私密马赛

Submit the first draft on October 28, 2024.
Major revisions on March 1, 2025.
Submit revisions on April 10, 2025.
Accepted on June 23, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 今天吃点啥

It's better not to play around with computer science, leave some room for telecommunications.

(0) 讚！ | 不想起床的Neet菌

Jokingly mentioning the Chinese Academy of Sciences, after all, it is a place where even fellows of the SPM cannot enter.

(0) 讚！ | 不想起床的Neet菌

It took about 9 months, with the first round (over four months) two RQs and one AQ, AE for RQ; the second round (over two months) two As and one AQ; one and a half months for revision for A.

The difficulty and reputation of TSP speak for themselves, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences is happy, after all, there is still the joke of TIT in three areas.

(0) 讚！ | SneakerDZ

2024-03-14: submitted
2024-03-24: In Peer Review
2024-06-28: Awaiting AE Decision
2024-06-30: Awaiting Decision Approval
2024-07-01: Rejected (Three reviewers, one minor revision, two rejections)
2024-09-23: resubmitted
2024-12-09: Awaiting AE Decision
2024-12-11: Minor revision (Three reviewers, one major revision, two minor revisions, but it is obvious that the reviewer 1 who originally requested a minor revision has been replaced by a new reviewer 1)
2024-12-17: resubmitted
2025-01-07: Awaiting AE Decision
2025-01-08: Accept
Although TSP is a top journal in the industry (even limited to the strong 985 and 211 disciplines in this industry), its Impact Factor has been dropping, it has been assigned a 2nd tier by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it has not been rated by the CCF. The cost-effectiveness is not very good.

(0) 讚！ | Jacob

8.8 major revision
10.2 revision submitted
10.22 awaiting AE decision
10.23 in peer review

The manuscript went from awaiting AE decision back to in peer review, indicating that there may be disagreement among the reviewers and the AE has sought additional reviewers. In the first round of reviews, one reviewer strongly recommended rejection with very superficial and unconstructive comments. It feels like even if we address his comments carefully, it won't be enough for acceptance. It seems like this round is also doomed because of this reviewer. Such a turbulent fate...

(0) 讚！ | 卡里克琼斯

4/13 submitted
4/17 prescreened
5/5 AE assigned, in peer review
7/19 major revision (1 major + 1 minor)
8/4 revise submitted, in peer review
9/12 accept

(0) 讚！ | GGbond

Has the result come out yet? I have been waiting for my Awaiting AE decision for 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | 立如青松

2024.8.8 major revision

2024年8月8日，重大修订。

(0) 讚！ | 卡里克琼斯

2024.5.1 submitted
2024.5.13 scheduled for prescreening (e-mail)
2024.5.22 in peer review
2024.7.30 awaiting AE decision
2024.8.7 awaiting decision approval

(0) 讚！ | 卡里克琼斯

2024.0715: Minor repairs

(0) 讚！ | bulanfly

2024.07.04: Awaiting AE Decision.

(0) 讚！ | bulanfly