| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS LetPub Score 8.6
63 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.8 Influence 8.3 Speed 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | IND CROP PROD | ||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0926-6690 | ||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1872-633X | ||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 103 | ||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 10.70%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/industrial-crops-and-products | ||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://submit.elsevier.com/INDCRO | ||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 农林科学 | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 隔月刊行 | ||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 2060每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 45.18% | ||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0926-6690%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 1.3 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: 66% 來自Elsevier的數據: 16% | ||||||||||||||||
| 在線文章發布時間 | 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 4.7 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 千秀玲 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-11-11 15:24:47 評論於 |
| 作者: kaisahw 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-11-09 16:47:57 評論於 |
| 作者: vocation 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-11-07 15:53:04 評論於 |
| 作者: 朱诗文 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-11-06 11:45:16 評論於 |
| 作者: 朱尼安 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-11-06 11:23:29 評論於 |
| 作者: F 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-28 10:28:36 評論於 |
| 作者: 贝多111 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-16 16:17:36 評論於 Hello, how are things going now? |
| 作者: 贝多111 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-16 16:15:25 評論於 Hello, I have also been with RRC for a long time. How are things going with you? |
| 作者: Grape F 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-14 09:27:02 評論於 This editor is really speechless, always dragging me along, making it impossible for me to submit to other journals, otherwise it would be considered as simultaneous submission. |
| 作者: Grape F 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-14 09:26:08 評論於 I am also this editor, I am speechless too, same old excuses. Can anyone find a way to ask this Korean editor properly, what is she thinking??? |
| 作者: xueZHONG123 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-14 09:07:44 評論於 I also transferred to another journal, and the editor is also HAN Minghui. It was a pure waste of time. After external review for half a year, it was sent back for revisions because it was deemed not within the scope of the journal. Just a pure waste of time. |
| 作者: man what can I say 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-10 17:55:15 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: Naduvilthara this edit |
| 作者: borni 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-10 10:23:32 評論於 Which editor handled it? So fast. |
| 作者: man what can I say 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-09 13:01:33 評論於 Too fast. The reason for switching from FRI to DR on June 30th was that the direction did not match. The system suggested switching to ICP, and the editor confirmed that it would be submitted for review. Switched to ICP on July 2nd, Submitted for review on July 10th, Returned for revisions on August 10th, Revised on September 2nd, Accepted on October 9th. |
| 作者: XiTang 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-06 16:34:36 評論於 The review speed is fast, and the feedback is also very good. I feel that once enough work has been done, we can give it a try. Apart from editorial formatting, it took three months to receive the review comments. The first round of review required two major revisions and one minor revision. It was difficult to make many revisions and conduct additional validation experiments. My research has a broad scope but lacks depth. After five or six rounds of revisions, it was finally accepted. No additional experiments were conducted. I encountered lenient reviewers and editors. During the final proofreading, it was clear that they were not very thorough, as many issues were barely addressed. Some of my peers even had their submissions accepted with minor revisions directly. Overall, it seems that this journal focuses more on quantity than quality. If the volume is large enough, it is easier to get accepted. |
| 作者: kaisahw 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-01 18:18:57 評論於 It's the same Han Minghui, this person is very unreliable. It has been over half a year since the submission, and pushing for the manuscript hasn't been effective. I guess this will be the final result. I searched online and found out that this woman seems to be a graduate of Nanlin University. |
| 作者: CaliforniaFOFO 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-10-01 11:17:03 評論於 Of course, the introduction, discussion, conclusion, and mechanisms were all revised. The manuscript underwent two major revisions, with a lot of microbiology content being deleted. |
| 作者: accept又一篇 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-30 10:14:10 評論於 Friend, do you have any changes in the subsequent repairs to increase relevance? |
| 作者: 强12 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-24 22:06:56 評論於 The revised manuscript submitted to another journal received major revisions from the reviewers, but the editor rejected it, saying it did not meet the requirements. Does it not meet the requirements of your review as well? |
| 作者: CaliforniaFOFO 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-23 13:07:30 評論於 5.22 transferred, 5.24 submitted for review, 20 received 2, 6.08 returned for minor and major revisions, the editor said to greatly enhance the relevance, 6.27 revised, 7.03 completed, and no other received until 8.28, urged twice and submitted ten received 1, 9.06 received one major revision, 9.10 revised, 9.15 minor revision and editor continued to enhance relevance, 9.18 revised, 9.22 received, only took four months for four revisions, the speed is still fast, the editor will continue to enhance relevance if they want to transfer投. |
| 作者: 不开腔的南瓜 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-22 16:28:02 評論於 What's going on with this journal? It's been RRC for so long after revision, and there's been no news at all. |
| 作者: borni 領域: 环境科学与生态学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-21 09:10:08 評論於 I am also Han Minhui, the editor. It has been almost 4 months, and only one reviewer has provided feedback. I'm getting a little worried. |
| 作者: kliang 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-21 06:14:56 評論於 Just submitted my application, but a senior sister in the same department has been waiting for four months without any news... I am feeling anxious, afraid that my graduation will be indefinitely postponed... |
| 作者: 卧是胖子 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-21 02:18:09 評論於 Just saw the system update, same response, same wording, this is just copied directly, four suggestions, two major changes, one minor change, one invisible, absolutely will not accept no matter what!!! |
| 作者: 文章必接受 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-09-21 00:02:22 評論於 It is recommended that everyone carefully consider transferring to this journal. It is a pure waste of time. Specifically, the editors, especially Minghui Han, are not human. I submitted two articles here, guaranteed peer review. After submission, there were no issues with the peer review comments and they provided major revisions. All comments could be answered, but the editors just directly stated rejection. It is purely disgusting. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us