The second trial often sees the first trial reviewer running away.

(1) 讚！ | 水煮鱼2333

The reviewers have received the manuscript, but have not yet provided any feedback. When asked, the editor advised to be patient and wait, but isn't it the responsibility of the reviewers to provide timely feedback? It seems unnecessary to play with people's emotions like this, especially when it is the authors who are awaiting the review.

(0) 讚！ | 想要发论文的star

Is it normal for there to be no reviewers assigned for a week during the second round of revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 仲夏合

I am in the same situation now. It has been three days since sending back to the author and it is still in the "stj" status. Does it really take this long?

(0) 讚！ | 芝士娃娃机

I submitted the article in March, and the editor gave some feedback and suggested resubmission. After making revisions, I submitted again and received the first review result approximately one month later, which required major revisions. I then made the revisions and submitted them in about 20 days, followed by a second review which required minor revisions and took another month. The issue now is that after submitting the minor revisions, I noticed that initially two reviewers were invited but neither of them completed the review. Instead, two new reviewers were invited, and then another one accepted the invitation. So now there are three reviewers, but isn't it usually two reviewers for the third review?

(0) 讚！ | NIHAOWANG

It's all good, but I upload them one by one.

(0) 讚！ | 时崎狂三

It has been half a month since the second review, but only one of the two reviewers has submitted comments, while the other one has been unresponsive.

(0) 讚！ | 时崎狂三

The reviewer seems to be taking 21 days.

(0) 讚！ | 无条件哈哈哈

I don't understand why the reviewer accepted the submission but didn't review it. Isn't there a clear 28-day deadline? Why take so long to review it?

(0) 讚！ | 想要发论文的star

Alright, thank you very much!

(0) 讚！ | 论文全中

Yes, you can directly upload the compressed file, and after building, it will also be in the form of a compressed file.

(0) 讚！ | XWZRBY

Thank you so much! So, in the beginning, when selecting the files to be kept, we can choose not to select the previous LaTeX file, and then when uploading files on the next page, we can just upload the compressed package of the entire LaTeX project, right? And then the item of the PDF built in the end is the downloadable compressed package, right?

(0) 讚！ | 论文全中

Please directly compress the LaTex file into a .zip file and upload it as the source file. The revised paper marked directly on the PDF file will suffice.

(0) 讚！ | XWZRBY

Hello, I would like to ask if the latest editable source file uploaded as a LaTeX file during the second submission will be compiled into the corresponding paper PDF when it is finally built? Or will it be individual "click here to access/download" files after building? Also, I would like to ask if the "Revised Manuscript with Changes Marked" section is for directly uploading a PDF file with revisions marked? Thank you! I hope to receive a reply from you!

(0) 讚！ | 论文全中

Hello, I would like to ask if the latest editable source file uploaded as a latex file during the second submission will be compiled into the corresponding paper pdf when it is finally built? Or will it be built into individual "click here to access/download" files? Also, I would like to ask if the "Revised Manuscript with Changes Marked" section is for directly uploading a pdf file with revisions marked?

(0) 讚！ | 论文全中

There is not even one reviewer available to accept the second review, which is frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 时崎狂三

The two reviewers from the second review who were sent back to the first review both accepted it. One finished reviewing in 11 days, while the other has not responded for 17 days, which doesn't feel good.

(0) 讚！ | 无条件哈哈哈

There were no reviewers accepting the manuscript for two days in the second review, feeling a bit anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 时崎狂三

It has been two days since the second review was submitted, and no reviewers have accepted the review yet. It doesn't feel right...

(0) 讚！ | XWZRBY

Why are you also asking about UU? Is it because one of the second reviewers has disappeared?

(0) 讚！ | 无条件哈哈哈

Can I ask if you received only one review comment in the second review, so you added two more reviewers, or did the two additional reviewers among the 4+ reviewers in the second review provide feedback?

(0) 讚！ | XWZRBY

Update on the progress, the second review manuscript was rejected after three and a half months, two new reviewers were added, who provided a bunch of opinions completely opposite to the first reviewer. It's really frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | luckyma

Is this journal so abstract? Just submitted an article and it hasn't been reviewed yet, but I already received two review invitations. Will they not review my submission if I decline? The numbers are all 1800+. When were these manuscripts submitted? Why is the later number not anonymized while the earlier one is? When did this journal become double-blind?

(9) 讚！ | 兔兔酱

Here is the translation of the passage:

Regarding the timeline:
4.29 submit
5.3 Editor-in-chief review and revision
5.12 under review 2-1-0
5.24 under review 2-2-0
5.26 under review 2-3-0
At the same time, I reviewed two manuscripts myself, both of which required revisions. I hope they will be treated kindly by the reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 想要发论文的star

Submitted on December 2, 2024, received reviewer comments on the first day of the Chinese New Year in 2025, both comments were minor revisions, but the editor requested major revisions. Submitted revised manuscript on February 28, 2025. During this period, many manuscripts from the International Political Science Review were also reviewed promptly. However... my manuscript has been under review since it was resubmitted until May 29, 2025 (today), showing "under review 4+", with 2 invitations accepted and 1 review completed. So, what is the reviewer who accepted the invitation but has been delaying submitting their review for three months trying to do? I was hoping this paper would help with my promotion evaluation... but I dare not rush them, afraid that they would reject the paper if I do. Will a paper be rejected in this situation?

(0) 讚！ | luckyma