June 2, 2026 7-2-2

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

I have been with the editor for a long time, it's been very agonizing. Have you submitted for review recently?

(0) 讚！ | mingliao

Hey, I noticed that you have been "with editor" for quite some time before moving to "under review". May I ask who the editor is? I am an editor from Italy and it has been ten days since I have been "with editor". I am considering whether I should follow up.

(0) 讚！ | mingliao

May 28, 2026 5-2-2
May 29, 2026 6-2-2

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

2026.5.29 Minor Revision (2 reviewers, 12 comments)

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaccccc

I met with the Japanese editor, who is still adding reviewers for R2, including the response to the editor. I have revised it four times, not sure what else can be added.

(0) 讚！ | 北纬30度

May 28, 2026 4-3-2

(0) 讚！ | aaaaaccccc

Can you provide articles on Industrial Energy Management and Informatics direction in IPM?

(0) 讚！ | llsie

2026.5.24 4-2-2 (or ur)

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

I have already revised the manuscript according to R2, but the previous reviewers have all disappeared. I hope the new reviewers can provide minor revisions or accept it. I have replied to nearly 100 pages and all the experiments have been supplemented.

(0) 讚！ | 球球了中一篇吧

May 21, 2026 2-0-0
May 22, 2026 3-1-1
May 24, 2026 4-2-1

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

On May 18, 2026, UR (1-0-0) I don't know why, a second reviewer was assigned for the review. Does anyone know if there will be any further reviewers assigned?

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

2026.2.8 stj
2026.2.8 we
2026.2.26 ur
2026.5.9 major (2 reviewers, 31 comments)
2026.5.14 we
Hope the second review goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | sdusttyc

It's been two weeks since I submitted it to the editor, and there has been no movement.

(0) 讚！ | Keyboy

Is it? I work with big data, thank you very much!

(0) 讚！ | bigbigpang

Is the LaTeX template for this journal in two columns? However, I see that the published papers are in single column. I'm not sure which one is correct.

(0) 讚！ | peterwu

Completely agree!

(0) 讚！ | GraphXX

I also had a major revision rejected in the second round of review. Every time this journal invites new reviewers, they always give major revisions to the reviewers for the first review. It's really hard to put into words how frustrating this journal can be.

(0) 讚！ | Edikang

Please, in the future, if the second reviewer sees a submission ending with R1, do not request major revisions. Instead, please reject it directly with a major revision. It's a waste of 4 and a half months.

(1) 讚！ | 知秋1

Translation: Already submitted to the editor, good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 永波

First investment in IPM, welcome good luck~
04/28/2026 Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 审稿人请温柔

It's absolutely ridiculous. I resubmitted a total of 2 times, was rejected about 7 times in the review process. The Japanese editor kept finding new reviewers and even encountered AI reviews that didn't delete even the prompt words. In the last submission, I received 3 accepts and one reject, and the editor directly rejected it.

(0) 讚！ | API666

It's ridiculous. Two rounds of resubmission in total, about 7 rejections. The Japanese editors kept finding new reviewers, even encountered AI reviewers who didn't even delete the prompts... The last time, 3 accepts and one rejection. The editor rejected it directly.

(0) 讚！ | API666

Yes, as long as it's not too unreasonable, although I may have some opinions, they are all explained, and the second review is just minor adjustments.

(0) 讚！ | li784606

Are there any big shots like me? What's going on? It's been almost two weeks since the second review was sent back for revisions and we're still waiting.

(0) 讚！ | 球球了中一篇吧