It's basically over. There's basically no chance after dipping with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | No 89757

Could I ask everyone if, after with editor, we directly DIP for a few days, would this situation generally enter under review?

(0) 讚！ | 石油降解

In September, I submitted once and then resubmitted after modifying the format. The main change was separating the results and discussion sections.

On October 13, 2021, it was sent to the editor.
On October 20, it was under review.
On November 9, it required major revisions. The revisions given to the reviewers in the reply letters totaled 14 pages, exceeding 10,000 words.
On January 28, 2022, minor revisions were made, focusing on linguistic corrections without any technical content.
On February 17, it was resubmitted with the editor.
On February 20, it was reviewed by Gu.
On February 21, it was accepted.
On February 28, proofreading was done.
On March 1, it went online.

For more details, you can refer to my link: [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358921572_Evaluation_of_PEG_and_sugars_consolidated_fragile_waterlogged_archaeological_wood_using_nanoindentation_and_ATR-FTIR_imaging]

(1) 讚！ | 入佳境

Thank you, it has been submitted a few days ago. I really like this journal and hope for good news.

(0) 讚！ | 一只放养的羊

Okay, just be patient and wait. I also had to wait for several days for my submission to be reviewed. It took about several months for the first review and another month to make revisions. After submitting the revisions, I had to wait for over a month to be accepted.
Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | let‘s 走

Three submissions, two rejections. The chief editor gave several suggestions, all of which have been implemented. It has been a week since submission, but it is still "with editor." Are there any fellow colleagues who have submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 一只放养的羊

Good magazine!!!!

(90) 讚！ | kleb.

2020.3.26, submission. The editor Gu raised several comments, and required to resubmit after revision; 2020.3.27, it was resubmitted after revision, and the editor changed to Zhanxin Min; 2020.4.30, major revision; 2020.5.22, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2020.6.4, accept. The efficiency of International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation was relatively high, and the review comments were not difficult to reply. The requirements on the language were relatively high. The editor mentioned twice that the result and discussion should be written separately. However, it was too difficult for our article to be written separately, so I declined both times. Finally, it was accepted. Thanks to the two editors.

(0) 讚！ | klliulingjie

I submitted my paper on April 26, 2019. The editor-in-chief Gu suggested revising the discussion section on the second day. I sent back my revision on the third day. The editor-in-chief delayed for a month without sending it out for review, and then transferred it to another editor-in-chief on 26 May. The editor-in-chief delayed for another month to invite a reviewer. He invited successfully the reviewer on July 23 and asked me for supplementary materials two days ago. External review has been in the process for almost 40 days. I have been waiting for more than four months since the beginning. I hope to have a happy ending and It will not be in vain to wait so long.

(115) 讚！ | ET

It was rejected two days after submission, it was not sent for review. Editor Jidong Gu gave 4 or 5 comments. I thought he paid attention to the research on mechanism, that is, those deeply studied were ok.

(1) 讚！ | 被拒稿狂魔

Overall, it was quite smooth. I felt that the answers and attitudes of the major revision were very important.

(5) 讚！ | 晴空永恒之*

journal is very efficient, and the impact factor is also rising.The submission process is as follows:2018.4 October 10 - April 24 Format review, revised and resubmitted, review comments less than 1 month to return comments, overhaul, return after about 20 days (formally modified about 5d, touch up 3d), directly accepted after 2 days.Thank you, reviewer and editor, the opinions are very good, and the American editor is very good. Thank you for your opportunity.The second article, although a bit late, can still be accepted, I hope that the latter will be smoother, and I wish myself a big article.

(0) 讚！ | zy_duty@163.com

Journals are very efficient.The first trial was given less than a month, and the two reviewers suggested overhaul.During the overhaul, because of the New Year and illness, the manuscript was dragged by myself for two months before returning.Received in less than a day!

(0) 讚！ | 馒头头

Gu editor is still pretty good, the first review returned in about 2 months

(1) 讚！ | 你好

Feb 02, 2013Submitted to JournalFeb 06, 2013With EditorFeb 15, 2013Under ReviewMar 10, 2013Revise (major revision)Mar 31, 2013Revision Submitted to JournalMar31, 2013Under ReviewMay 04, 2013 Revise (Accept after mi

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Gu Jidong is very poor. After receiving the manuscript, he did not find a reviewer for more than a month. He changed another editor

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

in September 2012.After more than four months, there is no news, and the trial time is long across the years!After five months, Gu has not responded, and changed to an editor for one month after the trial, tragedy!The most time-consuming journal!Half a year!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

2012.5.12Submission, returning to the revised opinion after 40 days, the comments of the two reviewers are received after minor repairs.After 20 days, the second draft will be improved, and the revised opinions will be returned in about 30 days. This time, it is basically the editor's comments and suggestions. On August 13th, it will be revised and submitted again. This is worse, waited for more than 70 days, and finallyAccept is given on October 27.The speed of the first trial is still OK. The speed of the second trial does not know why it is so slow. The Chinese articles are handled by Professor Gu Jidong of the University of Hong Kong, and the reviewers are likely to have Chinese researchers and professors....!!!Regarding environmental microbes, biodegradation, and biotechnology, the quality of this journal is fairly good. It is 10 times a year, and reception is not very difficult.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

British journal, my SCI debut is published in the journal (it was only 25 days from the submission to the editor to send back the review comments).Now the requirements of the journal are increasing day by day, and environmental microbes can be submitted, but systematic research is required, and the characterization test method should be perfected.The manuscripts in mainland China are mostly edited by Hong Kong. The editor is very nice. In my first article, he repeatedly changed it four times before receiving it.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名