submitted 10.19
under review 10.20
minor revision 2.04
revised 2.17
accepted 4.16
The speed is not fast, the direction may be relatively niche, but acceptance is still good.

(0) 讚！ | weilong\

Without editor, directly displayed under re....;
Rejected in one month.

(0) 讚！ | 快点accept

24.7 submission, reviewed by 11 reviewers, revised and accepted after 25.2 revisions within 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | 牧雩

I have been waiting for three months for the first review and still haven't received any results. It's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | weilong\

It may not necessarily be sent for review, it could be rejected in a few days. My senior brother was rejected.

(0) 讚！ | Zachary_x

What does it mean when something is not sent for review?

(0) 讚！ | weilong\

Although not fast, being hired is still considered a relatively good outcome.

(0) 讚！ | nyman1000

It seems like this journal sends submissions for review as soon as they are received, right?

(1) 讚！ | nyman1000

Same question, is "under review" on the second day an external audit?

(0) 讚！ | goodgood

Okay, thank you

(0) 讚！ | Ancel12

I forgot, it seems like there isn't any

(0) 讚！ | Zachary_x

Hello, may I ask if NAG has a "with editor" step? My submission went directly to "under review" the next day after submission, does this mean it has been sent for external review?

(2) 讚！ | Ancel12

Hello, may I ask if NAG has a step with editor? My submission went under review the day after I submitted it. Does this mean it is being sent for external review?

(1) 讚！ | Ancel12

Submitted on September 4, 23.
Revised by two reviewers on January 17, 24.
Revised on March 3, 24.
Accepted on April 20, 24

(1) 讚！ | Zachary_x

Submitted on January 23, 24
Rejected on April 20, 24
But received positive reviews from two reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 我一定可以毕业

The results of people around you who submit their work usually come out in three to four months, which should be decided primarily by reviewers. The specific timeline is as follows:
2023.1.02 submitted
2023.1.03 under review
2023.8.25 minor revisions
2023.8.30 revisions made
2023.10.07 accepted
The whole process took approximately 9 months and 5 days

(0) 讚！ | 蓝眼睛

Any news, buddy? It's been 6 months since I submitted my work and there hasn't been much movement. Should I dare to send an email to ask the editor?

(0) 讚！ | cc0924

How long does it usually take for a journal to be revised?

(0) 讚！ | 唐吉诃德

It has been seven months and still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 蓝眼睛

2023.1.02 submitted
2023.1.03 under review
Four months have passed and the first review has not yet been completed.

(0) 讚！ | 蓝眼睛

La revisión se ha enviado el 8 de abril de 2023. 

(Translation: The revision has been submitted on April 8, 2023.)

(0) 讚！ | contaminate

31/12/2022, submitted
02/1/2023, under review
17/3/2023, minor revision
18/4/2023, accept

From submission to acceptance, it took 4 and a half months. The reviewing speed of the journal is really fast. The recognition of this journal in foreign countries is very high. I don't understand why it is only ranked as a 3rd or 4th tier journal in the Chinese Academy of Sciences classification.

(0) 讚！ | contaminate

Correction, 17/8/2022, under review.

(0) 讚！ | 科研垃圾

8/17/2022, Under Review
7/11/2022, Minor Revision
17/1/2023, Submit the Revision
18/1/2023, Accept (without External Review)

NAG's requirements and peer review are quite strict. Many times, even if the paper is sent for review, it is likely to be rejected after major revisions. It is important to improve the quality of the manuscript!

The WeChat number provided for communication is: ly1308110437.

(31) 讚！ | 科研垃圾

NAG and COGE are the best publications in computational geotechnical mechanics. NAG has fewer publications and a longer history, while COGE has rapidly improved its impact factor in recent years due to its extremely fast review process and the involvement of a large number of Chinese editorial board members. COGE has become the top journal in computational geotechnical engineering, while NAG is gradually declining and has even been classified as a third-tier journal by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. However, both NAG and COGE are good journals, at least ranking below Geotechnique, JGGE, and CGJ in the field of geotechnical engineering.

(25) 讚！ | 姑苏寒山寺